Comments by "Dirk Diggler" (@dirkdiggler8260) on "JRE Clips" channel.

  1. Really?? You think they can just arrest without cause, no reason whatsoever? lol, i don't think so.
    1
  2. And if that's true, that had NOTHING whatsoever to do with the missing money that was later tracked and accounted for.
    1
  3.  @joshuaboatwright5357  Yeah, because the fed no doubt pay people to go on youtube comment sections to coubter the long debunked, inane arguments of the tinfoil hat wearing members of the lunatic fringe, right? 🤪👍🏼 lol, get a grip you crackpot.
    1
  4. If you say so champ 🤪👍🏼
    1
  5.    🤪👈🏽
    1
  6.    🤪👈🏽
    1
  7. Really? Yet a piece of 2x4 timber can punch through concrete with much less force than thise planes hit, just from the wind blowing it 🤔 You clearly have a very poor grasp of basic physical principles. Those planes EASILY smashed through those columns because in reality, there really isn't much that can stop a 200 ton mass travelling in excess of 500mph, striking with the force equivalent to 1.35 tons of TNT.
    1
  8.  @phillip8596  Powerful people??? Why are you people so damned paranoid? The internet has a lot to answer for 🙈 Alex Jones is one of the biggest whackjobs this world has ever seen. He's so full of sh!t all we can do is laugh, but after a while it tends to become a little tiresome. Why give a scamming lunatic a platform to spew his nonsense and sell his snakeoil??
    1
  9.  @larsbee  Not lost, just missing in respect to them having trouble tracking it between departments. It was later recovered and contrary to truther mythology, it wasn't announced the day before the attacks in an attempt to allow the attacks to distract, it was actually made public back in 1999.
    1
  10.  @bevbiltgarage9791  No it isn't and if you actually believe that, you're insane. Such logic us so easily refuted and fundamentally flawed on several counts. Why would they announce it publicly if that were true? It makes zero sense.
    1
  11.  @tonysextremerestorations9896  Really? Is it? What a stupid comment lol.
    1
  12.  @derekstulce2023  Oh not that old chestnut again 🙈 In reality: 'The Sixteenth Amendment provides that Congress shall have the power to lay and collect taxes on income, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several states, and without regard to any census or enumeration.'
    1
  13.  @larsbee  It's well known they had some intelligence and recognised the high possibility of a forthcoming attack, and it's also known that if the difrerent agencies had worked closer together instead of maintaining some form of rivalry, there was a fair chance the attacks would have been thwarted. This doesn't equate to compliance. The US government most definitely did not allow this to happen willingly.
    1
  14.  @JackCarlock56  You don't think they would have had back-up documents? What are you suggesting exactly? Only the facade reached freefall once it became detached from the building itself. The actual building didn't reach freefall. The freefall also occurred midway through the collapse as opposed to at the collapse initiation, as occurs in a controlled demolition. This was simply due to buckling. Multiple studies have confirmed this you say? You mean one, which was funded by truthers who insisted the study began with the presupposition that fire wasn't the cause of collapse. All other serious studies have concluded fire was the cause, even if they differ slightly on the finer details. What do you believe brought the building down if not fire? How do you explain the fire fighters who assessed it stating a collpase was inevitable, several hours prior to it falling?
    1
  15. It's not like they just shrugged their shoulders and wrote that money off so i fail to see your argument and how your debt has any bearing on any of this? Your argument is nonsensical.
    1
  16.  @dylanmuncy4885  Stop spreading lies you delusional crackpot. No they did NOT pocket it, it was later tracked and accounted for. Why the hell would they make it public if they just stole it?? You guys just vome here seeking an echo-chamber from fellow whackjobs. Get a grip ffs.
    1
  17.  @rawnature5356  lol
    1
  18.  @arsh4d88  Not if i wrap myself in tinfoil! 🤪👍🏼
    1
  19.  @rawnature5356  Maybe if i watched a bunch of dumb conspiracy videos and blindly believed everything claimed on them, i would be as enlightened as you are 🤪👍🏼
    1
  20.  @chauvinemmons  Of course it was 🤣 Shocking how many people believe such utter buIIshit without a shred of evidence lol
    1
  21.  @rawnature5356  Oh p!ss of you delusional, unlearned dullard. You're not fooling anybody. You've got NOTHING. You've just watched the same buIIsh!t conspiracy videos and blindly believe everything said on them. You've not even bothered your lazy, uneducated ass to read the actual studies you're so desperate to dismiss. When you've gained some confidence to debate the facts, be sure to let me know and we can talk. Until then, your cowardly tactics masquerading as smug bravado won't wash sorry. Now run along and try find somebody dumb and gullible enough to believe the lunacy you spew.
    1
  22. Really? Can you provide any evidence to back up your claim that missing money (that was never actually missing in the way twoofers like to claim) was spent on 'black ops', or do we have to just take your word for it?
    1
  23. You're with Eddie on this??? 🤣 Enjoy your life of ridicule, it's thoroughly deserved.
    1
  24.  @hornox4life  Wow, you have a seriously vivid imagination if you truly believe that 🤣 You're not serious are you surely?? If so then you be sure to let me know when you can back that truly insane claim up with evidence.
    1
  25.  @FARTQUAKE74  Which is what happened, although the wings certainly did cause some damage, as did the vertical stabiliser.
    1
  26.  @KrikZ32  So when did you gain your pilots licence or degree in aeronautical engineering? You saying something is impossible doesn't make it so and you can find footage of large airliners doing very similar high speed, low fly passes here on YouTube. There was nothing whatsoever impossible about it and the trajectory works out just fine. We have the black box to confirm this as well as 136 direct eye-witnesses, some of whom were pilots who fly 757's who confirmed it to be just that. Nothing unusual about WTC7 hence why the fire fighters who assessed it stated several hours before it fell that a collapse was inevitable. Too many uneducated opinions talking like they're experts, that's the issue here.
    1
  27. Amazing that you don't, given the overwhelming evidence we have proving it.
    1
  28.  @hornox4life  Correction, what YOU believe is contradicted by ALL evidence. 136 direct eye-witnesses, ALL saw a LARGE plane, some confirmingit to be a 757. The structures struck on approach perfectly tally up with the dimensions of a 757's wingspan and engine separation. The wreckage retrieved was from a 757. The black box was from AA Flight 77 and detailed it's final 11 flights. The remains of all on board were recovered from the crash site in what was THE biggest forensic investigation in history. ATC evidence confirms a 757. In fact, there is ZERO evidence whatsoever suggesting it was a small plane. You really do need to learn how to conduct better research.
    1
  29.  @hornox4life  You're clearly very ill...... or drunk. Unlike you, i have the evidence to back up everything I say whereas you have literally nothing. Let's demonstrate that. Show me ANY evidence a small plane hit the building. You must either believe everyone who witnessed it is lying, or simply that nobody saw a thing. Which is it?
    1
  30.  @hornox4life  Sorry, was the request for evidence an unreasonable request? 🙄 lol
    1
  31.  @hornox4life  Evidence d!ckhead, do part of that word do you not understand? As a wise man once said, 'what can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence'. Put up or shut up you fact-dodging clown.
    1
  32. Or maybe he just doesn't fall for the dumb sh!t you conspiracy kooks gullibly fall for.....🙄
    1
  33.  @PerfectPrimarch  Oh come on. He does that because he knows how full of sh!t Alex Jones is and is probably somewhat embarrassed by the lunacy he spews. See it for what it is.
    1
  34. 🤪👈🏽
    1
  35. I lost respect the moment he turned into a right wing crackpot.
    1
  36. ​ @GhostDog36556 The bible also speaks about people like Trump & not in a very good way. You can't be a Christian & support Donald Trump sorry 🤷
    1
  37.  @JustinKerns8x6  Yes there was, stop lying.
    1
  38.  @Redman680  Another lying twoofer 🥱
    1
  39.  @TheBaBaTV  All there to protect the perimeter and NOT pointing down the street, away from the building. That's not the purpose of CCTV. Just an argument from ignorance.
    1
  40.  @backinthegsxr3881  THE biggest liar on the internet so far. You're all mental, pathological liars.
    1
  41.  @alexandermack66  Except there was.
    1
  42.  @jcreature11  Poles were hit, thus confirming the wingspan of the 757 everybody witnessed hitting the Pentagon. Strangely, not a single witness report of a missile 🤔
    1
  43.  @jcreature11  Ok so it wasn't a plane or a missile, what exactly so you think it was? And yes, theres plenty of eye-witness accounts, some interviews are even on youtube.
    1
  44.  @jcreature11  So hang on, you actually believe that everybody sat in traffic in their morning commute, including doctors, firemen, clergymen etc. etc. were approached by government officials and asked to lie about what they saw, on the most horrific day in modern, American history, to help them cover up the mass murser of thousands of their fellow American citizens??? 🙈 Jesus christ, you're clearly deranged lol. So you believe all the first responders were paid off, ATC staff, every single eye-witness, all the remains of everyone on board along with plane wreckage from AA Flight 77, all planted without anybody seeing or blowing the whistle???? 🤣🤣🤣 Ok pal, whatever you say 🤪👈🏽
    1
  45.  @S810IC  No you did not you shameless LIAR!!!!! I've watched that video many times and contrary to the whackjob liar you're replying to, it most DEFINITELY does not show any 'missile'. Why are truthers ironically all such bare faced liars?
    1
  46.  @jcreature11  You're a kook mate. A gullible crackpot who blindly believes everything he read on the internet, as long as it supports your agenda that is.
    1
  47.  @themandwellaeffect1970  Liar
    1
  48.  @chrisstrube1244  .....and another liar
    1
  49.  @matildamarmaduke1096  Jesus Christ, another one! So many shameless liars on this thread 🙈
    1
  50.  @snatchhog  What exactly are you smoking? What loose ends are there and are you telling you'd accept the conclusions of another investigation if it concluded it was as the official story states? No, of course you wouldn't! You'd just say that was a sham too because your sort are only concerned with conspiracy, regardless of the facts. How the hell would the goverment get charges with conspiracy?? On what grounds??? 🙈 You people are beyond ridiculous. You'd need something called 'evidence' for there to be any hope of doing that, and evidence is something you whackjobs don't have, otherwise you wouldn't all be seeking an echo-chamber on youtube forums.
    1