Comments by "Dirk Diggler" (@dirkdiggler8260) on "JRE Clips"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Redman680 If you're going to question other people's intellect then you'd better get your facts straight your fkng brain donor. 12 billion?? You mean 2.3 trillion. And why would i just mention that when there was no context to do so?? Yes, he did speak the about it the day prior to the attacks but as usual, you beIIends only offer half a story and completely take it out of context. In reality, this missing money was never actually missing in the way you dullards claim as you aren't actually aware, given that all you've done is parrot the same lies the dumbass twoofer you heard it off. It was simply a case of them having difficulty tracking it between departments due to the them using incompatible, outmoded software. It was made public back in 1999 and spoken of publicly several times up to and after the 9/11 attacks, so to say it was never spoken of again simply highlights how tragically feeble your research efforts have been. The money was later tracked and accounted for so once again, epic fail. Stop talking about things you CLEARLY have no knowledge of.
In respect to using 4 planes in the attack to warrant going to war, just one single plane flown into the towers, the Pentagon, the Capital builidng, Whitehouse or any other prominent structure in the US would have offered the EXACT same level of justification. There would be no need whatsoever to take the insanely high and pointless risk of hijacking 4 planes and doing what they did. And I'm the clown?? Get to fk you window-licking simpleton, stop wasting my time and come back when you've familiarised yourself a little better with the facts. Idiot.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@adamallen3365 The military run exercises all the time, nothing whatsoever unusual about that.
I call buIIshit on the guy interviewed u speak of & have no idea who u mean. But yeah, total buIIshit. This tells me you're in the high end of the crackpot scale to believe all this crisis actor boIIocks that the lunatic Alex Jones spreads.
Even if it's true that you were in the Air Force (which so many people like on here but will give you the benefit of the doubt for arguments sake), how in the hell does that qualify you to speak on such issues?? How is being in the Air Force make you an expert in the physics of such an event? Don't be ridiculous. The fact you don't understand how a 120 ton mass (or whatever it was, I can't remember exactly now) can EASILY smash through a few relatively thin steel columns highlights your painfully poor grasp of basic physics. This really is high-school level. The greater the mass & the greater the velocity, the greater the force, or Force = Mass x Acceleration. Do the math & you'll see that the planes could have been travelling less than a third of the speeds they were & would still have struck with enough force to break through them with ease. As it was, those planes struck with a force equivalent to 1.35 tons of TNT. Show me a single physicist who is making this argument & when you realise there aren't any, ask yourself if you seriously believe you've discovered something obvious that they've failed to.
Ok, so claiming the STANDARD manoeuvre Hanjour used to make his final descent provea to me you weren't in the Air Force at all. If you were then it most certainly wasn't in a position that required any understanding of aviation in any way. How the hell is it impossible??? What would make it impossible? Boeing have no issue with it & again, it was a standard manoeuvre used by pilots to lose altitude when coming into land. There was very limited stress in the airframe & planes can EASILY withstand MUCH greater stresses.
No thermite was found in any dust samples, that's been utterly debunked. All they found were red paint chips from the red oxide paint used to prime the steel prior to it being erected, along with iron microspheres which were in the materials used in the construction, liberated in the collapse. They were also formed in huge numbers during the collapse itself as they're simply the result of sparking.
9 trillion dollars did NOT go missing the day before. I think what you're referring to (whilst highlighting the shallow knowledge of this event) is the 2.3 trillion dollars that Rumsfeld mentioned again (it had been made public YEARS prior) there was 2.3 trillion dollars they were struggling to track due to the fact they were using outmoded computer systems which made it very difficult to track between departments. It was never actually missing as it was stolen & was eventually accounted for. Why would they bother announcing it at all if it was all part of a government conspiracy to attack their own people?? Makes zero sense.
Hang on, you're claiming to have been in the Air Force whilst saying it was a missile that struck the Pentagon?? 🤣 Now I am calling buIIshit on your claims of military service. There were tons of wreckage recovered, we have plenty of images of some from the day. Please explain how a missile explodes with an OBVIOUS hydrocarbon explosion which is very different to a missile strike? How would a missile take out lamposts either side of a street over 100ft apart? How would a missile leave an exit hole? How could all 136 direct eyewitnesses report it being a plane & not be able to tell the difference between a 155ft screaming airliner with 125ft wingspan, & a 22ft missile with a 9ft wingspan? How would a missile Alice the tops off trees? Where did all the plane wreckage (including the black box) come from? Where did all the remains of the passengers get there? I could go on but you get my point. Anybody who believes a missile did that really is in no position to be talking in this subject.
Larry Silverstein was FORCED to take out insurance on the World Trade Complex by the Port Authority he leased the complex from. It was in the contract & is standard for businesses to be insured. This is not in the slightest bit suspicious in any way. He actually lost a fortune in the attacks as the claim didn't even cover the cost of the rebuild, let alone all the lost revenue whilst still having to pay the Port Authority 100 million a year in rent.
Other passports were found but yes, one of the hijackers passports was found but to say it was unblemished is just false. It wasn't badly damaged, but there was damage. Passports survive plane crashes all the time & such items are easily expelled in a blast due to their high surface to mass ratio. It was found amongst THOUSANDS of pieces of paper & other debris that survives the blast. There were plenty of the passengers personal items recovered, wtf are you talking about? Go to the 911 memorial museum & you'll see some of them right there, donated by the families. Your knowledge on this subject is clearly very poor & your arguments invalid, all debunked a thousand times.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@brianaspeelman9540 Nice deflection Briana lol, what a cop-out. Unlike you, and unfortunately for you, i can back up my claims but then you'd need a genuine concern for truth for that to matter to you, which you clearly lack.
For the record, what you're saying is that all of those witnesses sat in traffic on their morning commute, were paid actors yes? Why not a single account of a missile? How do you explain the fact we can take the security footage ourselves and pause it, zoom in and see what is OBVIOUSLY a large commercial jet? No need to believe the media, which i find such accusations hilarious given that all you do is blindly believe everything you read on notoriously unreliable conspiracy websites, compiled by crackpots as unlearned and gullible as yourself. Carry on with your kooky delusions and pretend you know better than the rest of us when you're so painfully ignorant of even a fraction of the mass of evidence we have available to us, of which categorically PROVES AA Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon that day. To believe all these people required to be involved and complicit with helping to cover up the mass murder of thousands of their fellow citizens, have kept quiet for all this time without a single one blowing the whistle, it really is the height of lunacy. You are out of your tiny mind and just telling us that 'we will soon see', after 20+yrs of failed conspiracy claims, is pretty weak. I'm afraid you're going to have to do a bit better than that sorry Briana.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mitsulang So what you're saying is, you expected to see a plane shaped, cartoon silhouette of a plane in a heavily reinforced concrete wall? 🤣 I'm sorry but thats just stupid and nothing more than an argument from incredulity. Watch the video on YouTube of the Phantom F4 jet Sled Test where it hits a wall of similar structure at 500mph and then come back and tell me that again. The "round hole" incidentally you speak was actually the exit hole which most truthers bizarrely believe to be the impact hole. Just goes to show how seriously you take your research. I'd love to hear how you believe a missile would leave such an exit hole by the way lol.
Contrary to what you say, there WAS impact damage from the wings in the walls, as well as damage from the vertical stabiliser.
Next you mention the engines, and no they did not disintegrate and can clearlu be seen in some of the images of the wreckage. The entire engines aren't made of titanium, you know this right?
Regarding Flight 93, that plane nose dived into the ground at 500+mph at full throttle so yes, OBVIOUSLY it broke apart into a million pieces, some of which buried several meters into the ground. Are you telling me this was planted? 95% of the aircraft was recovered from the crash site and surrounding areas by HUNDREDS of volunteers who scoured the area retrieving it all. All planted yes? Lol, come on.
You then claim we know it was the named terrorists because of the "perfectly intact ID found on the ground at WTC" which i can only assume you're talking about the passport found prior to the collapse of the towers. Again, another argument from incredulity. Firstly, that is NOT how we know it was them. We know it was them from several lines of intelligence collated and the fact they were on the flight manifest which would make planting this passport (which is what you're suggesting) utterly pointless and nothing but a needless risk. In reality, passports often survive plane crashes and paper products often survive explosions due the high surface to mass ratio. This is well understood science so your arguments simply don't stand up to scrutiny sorry. This is the same with literally every truther argument made which is why the overwhelming consensus of experts reject there ridiculous conspiracy theories.
1
-
1