Comments by "Dirk Diggler" (@dirkdiggler8260) on "Real Stories" channel.

  1. What? Loud bangs in a huge building fire?? Surely not??? How unusual! And given they knew a terrorist attack was happening, to assume bombs is also extremely odd too right? 🙄 lol. I could list a hundred reasons why louds bangs/explosions would occur in such circumstances without invoking bombs. I could also EASILY refute any notion of those bangs being bombs on several grounds. The towers collapsed from fire.
    20
  2. Thankfully! Good riddance to such socially damning hogwash. Twoofers deserve nothing more than ridicule and i strongly advise anybody with a sense of rationale to actively ridicule such crackpots at every given opportunity.
    12
  3.  @serjherman  Nope, they were completely random, out of sequence and inconsistent with any controlled demolition. Why on earth would they set off explosives an hour prior to collapse? That isn't how controlled demolitions work. If you'd ever witnessed a CD then you would know this was no demolition. Please explain how both towers collapsed at the impact zones? Impossible in terms of a controlled demo. Just name ONE demolitions expert who believes the twin towers were demoed or have you managed to convince yourself that you know more on the topic than the entire demolitions community? Reports of explosions going off before the planes hit have been completely refuted by the seismic data alone. Again, why would they set bombs off in the basement an hour to ninety minutes before collapse from the top down??? lol, there is no way whatsoever that those towers were demoed.
    12
  4. So even though his own mother said he had introduced himself on the phone to her this way before, you STILL say conspiracy?? 🙈 Need we say any more? I'm afraid that no amount of evidence could ever change a mind like yours.
    11
  5. 🤣 Damn right, can you imagine being stuck with that??? 🙈
    8
  6.  @Oldschooldan1  Bravo 👏 You have more patience than i do with these window-licking kooks and i commend you for trying. These morons are clearly broken beyond repair but your efforts do help those still on the fence who are open to opposing evidence and do genuinely have a concern for truth. Keep up the good work sir 😁👍🏼
    7
  7.  @eddygoodwin7089  Oh Eddy, reading the blinding ignorance contained in your comments is quite tragic. Even after having it explained to, you still refuse to accept reality and clearly have no desire to try and understand. Some people just love conspiracy and prefer fiction to fact. Unfortunately for you, the opinions of those sort of people don't matter.
    6
  8.  @leonbroekx  They're all things we know for sure occurred within those towers that day, plus many other rational reasons that don't include magical, fire/impact resistant explosives. The point is, loud bangs were absolutely expected and are common place in building fires. As for the steel being shipped off, that was ONLY any steel that was shown to have no bearing on the collapse. Any steel that was of interest was kept for further investigation along with debris that was literally sifted through for years after the event. It was properly investigated.
    6
  9.  @eddygoodwin7089  What would you like to know that hasn't already been explained to you?
    5
  10.  @NoLefTurnUnStoned.  No, yours disappear when i open the thread too but if you just click in the comment in your messages, it will take you to it and you can reply. Nice strawman argument though! 😂👍🏼 Just because i don't accuse Bush for something he clearly didn't do, doesn't make me a fan. I don't blame Hitler for WW1 but that doesn't make him my hero. Can you just address what I said and admit you're wrong about what you've said regarding buildings collapsing from fire? What's so difficult about that? 🤷🏽‍♂️
    5
  11. 🤣 Which part of the debunking managed to convince you to ditch reality? What a truly bizarre conclusion to reach. Just goes to show, there's no fixing stupid 🤷🏽‍♂️
    4
  12.  @jonathanvince8173  I see you chose to ignore the facts rather than address them in order to discern truth, just like every truther must do in order to cling on to his whacky conspiracy beliefs. This literally happens EVERY SINGLE TIME i try to debate a 9/11 truther, and this is why nobody of worth takes 9/11 truthers seriously or ever will. People who run from the evidence clearly have no real concern for truth.
    4
  13.  @itzjcee557  Best comment you've ever read on YouTube???? 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Yours is mine 🤪👍🏼 lol
    4
  14.  @NoLefTurnUnStoned.  Bye then 👋🏼🙄
    4
  15.  @rumble8014  Uh-oh, i smell a ReTrumplican 😬
    3
  16.  @jamescameron277  Are yoh saying you disagree with those incontrovertible facts?? The degree of wilful ignorance witnessed by those window-licking dullards is breathtaking.
    3
  17. @Matthew Smith Ah, but Eddy apparently has 'common sense' so doesn't need a background in engineering to know the intricacies of how skyscrapers are built 🤷🏽‍♂️
    3
  18.  @NoLefTurnUnStoned.  My reply that began with the words; "l know all of this because.....". If you like i will copy and paste it for you again if you wish?
    3
  19.  @NoLefTurnUnStoned.  Arr you going to respond or just slope away again?
    3
  20.  @Altt  She's wrong about literally every single other thing she's said, so even though I've not checked, I'm guessing total horsesh!te 🤷🏽‍♂️
    3
  21.  @MD-zy9xk  Almost all calls were made using the Airphones on the backs if the seats. The one or two made on cell phones weren't made at altitude and were over land. We also don't know how many failed attempts were made usibg cell phones before they connected. Those calls were real, 100% and anybody who claims otherwise is being wilfully ignorant.
    2
  22.  @BeastReview  Unfortunately that is the downside 😔 lol
    2
  23. Why is their nationality a factor in this for you? I fail to see your logic sorry.
    2
  24.  @jonathanvince8173  Didn't happen. Heat weakens steel, it's that simple.
    2
  25.  @jonathanvince8173  Welding steel is incomparable to a steel under IMMENSE load losing strength through sustained heat. We see it happen all the time and can offer countless examples of this occurring. At around 550 degrees, the strength of structural steel is reduced by 50%. Given how temperatures in standard office/hydrocarbon fires exceed this, not to mention the fact we literally have footage showing entire floor slabs sagging and columns and beams buckling from the heat prior to collapse. Why on earth do we use fire-proofing if what you say is true?
    2
  26.  @John-ed2wj  A drill imagining 38 hijacked planes or scenarios?? I don't think so. Cite your source and prove me wrong by all means. Burden of proof is yours. Let's face it, you literally don't believe anything is a coincidence, ever........and you expect people to take you seriously?? 🤣 Coincidences happen ALL the time, every single day.
    2
  27.  @Oldschooldan1  It's tragic such lunacy is so prevalent in our society. They have to be the laziest minds imaginable given how easily refuted their arguments are. Can you imagine convincing yourself you've discovered something so obvious that the entire physics community have missed? Talk about delusions of grandeur. As i said, i have very little patience with these people and after watching this episode of the series, being reminded of the kind of repugnant a-holes truthers generally are, i know why lol. Its all an unforgivable display of lazy-minded, wilful ignorance. Over 20yrs since the event and they STILL don't have a shred of credible supportive evidence that stands up to scrutiny to back up their crazy beliefs.
    2
  28.  @eddygoodwin7089  Still waiting Eddie......🙄
    2
  29.  @NoLefTurnUnStoned.  What, like you shamelessly ignored my response and questions to you a month back? Hypocrisy, much? 🤔
    2
  30.  @NoLefTurnUnStoned.  None? You mean except for the Plasco building in Tehran, the Sight and Sound theatre in Pennsylvania, the Kader Toy factory and all the other steel framed structure that have collapsed ENTIRELY from fire without having thousands of tons of debris dropping on them from a collapsing skyscraper, resulting in massive structural damage? 🤔 Why truthers keep saying repeating this myth baffles me. It shows you just repeat what you hear on conspiracy websites without actually qualifying the claims made. This is the difference between us. I did, hence why i know full well the claims of conspiracy simply do not stand up to scrutiny. Aside from all the steel-framed structures that HAVE collapsed from fire, can you offer me a single comparable event? If not then your 'only ever time' argument doesn't stand. Comparing a concrete high-rise to a non-concrete reinforced, steel-framed structure is absurd. Concrete deals with heat much, MUCH better than steel. It's that simple. The Grenfell tower also hadn't sustained any structural damage and had fire fighters trying to put out the blaze. Incomparable for many reasons sorry. Wonder no more. Back to the fire fighters tending to WTC7, so what are you saying? We have four choices. They were either in on this alleged conspiracy; they made an exceptionally lucky guess; they were psychic; it was simply that obvious as they were fully aware that ANY non-concrete reinforced, steel-framed structure will ALWAYS collapse if left to freeburn long enough. It's the reason we use fire-proofing. Incidentally, the fires freeburned 2hrs longer than the fireproofing was rated it. There really is no mystery here and no requirement for invisible, silent, heat-proof demolition devices........or space laser 🙄
    2
  31.  @AllHaiLKINGTIsHeRe3  Aw, don't spoil their fun 😂
    2
  32.  @vodking  Well i know there were literally thousands of people who directly witnessed the planes hit the towers, and i know there was plenty of independent, civilian footage of the second plane hitting, and i know there was 757 wreckage found at the crash site, and i know there were people hit by pieces of wreckage after it exited the tower.......but how can we be sure when we can't trust the governments MSM, d'illuminate, reptilian overlords? 🤪 lol, there's no way of reasoning with whackjobs like TI Joe. They see only what they want. Conspiracy theories make the stupid and dumb feel smart, and they're not readily willing to relinquish that feeling in hurry. Certainly not when they can find an echo chamber on forums like this, simply running away when challenged by evidence they can't justify in terms of their kooky beliefs, of which we both know there to be much. Still, it's all good fun right? 😁👍🏼
    2
  33.  @TIJoe-te9qu  Engines were found at all crash sites and jumbo jets weren't even invented when the towers were designed! 🙈🤣 But hey, who are we to question such a credible guy like yourself about the physics of a jet airliner striking a steel-framed skyscraper at 50mph? It's all 'just common sense', right Chuck? ✊🏼🤪
    2
  34.  @FrankOWahl  Sounds like a typical truther who's willing to lie in order to make facts fit with their agenda. Around 80% of those on that list have no relevant background, experience or knowledge of such topics and are indeed made up of all kinds of non-related engineering backgrounds. If you listen to the arguments of these people then you'll soon learn they bring nothing new to the table and just repeat the same, long refuted arguments the likes if you and ithers around here make. That isn't how science works sorry and they need to follow the rules if they wish to be taken seriously. They make up less than 0.1% of their respective communities and are very much the fringe. The AIA have spoken out to state they do NOT share their views nor wish to be associated with this bogus organisation. Nice try but no cigar sorry.
    2
  35.  @FinnaRealtawk2323  The towers collapsed from the bottom up?? And with that we can safely dismiss everything else you say as the inane ramblings of a mad man. The footage CLEARLY shows the towers collapsing at the impact zones. To say otherwise is lunacy.
    2
  36. The individual you speak of who made such comments (although your take on their remarks is somewhat false) was talking about them PRIOR to the further training they received and PRIOR to them gaining commercial pilot licences. There was nothing spectacular or difficult about any manoeuvre made that day; they weren't ace pilots nor did they need to be. They were merely reckless. Crashing a plane is the easiest thing in the world so why you're trying to make out otherwise i don't know. It's an incredibly weak argument based on lies, ignorance and incredulity.
    2
  37.  @VETTEDZ06  Erm, thanks. I'd say nice face tatts but I've never been a fan of American wrestling.
    2
  38.  @jamescameron277  Researched it and found ZERO truth to truther claims. This truther myth has been well and truly debunked.
    1
  39.  @VETTEDZ06  Yes, Airphone calls.
    1
  40.  @VETTEDZ06  So where is she? Are you suggesing Ted is in on this alleged conspiracy also? As for it being a good story, facts remain facts whether you accept them or not. Those calls were made from Airphones.
    1
  41.  @VETTEDZ06  No answers? Are they not reasonable questions, or do you prefer people not to question your poor logic?
    1
  42. Wouldn't you get frustrated by such insolence and level of breathtaking ignorance? He's a comedian, not a journalist and good on him for calling out those morons on their lunacy.
    1
  43. Of course it's one sided! Did you seriously expect it to lend weight and pander to long refuted conspiracy theories if the lunatic fringe?? No, this was meant to highlight how lost and incapable of reason some truther nuts are in light of opposing evidence. It just goes to show how for some people, regardless of the evidence, they believe only what they want to believe. This is why nobody of worth takes any notice of 911 truthers.
    1
  44.  @TIJoe-te9qu  Keep making dumb strawman arguments that only show how little you've reaearched this beyond watching notoriously unreliable conspiracy videos and blindly believing everything they say 🐑
    1
  45.  @SM-mz2hz  No. When did I say that?
    1
  46.  @SM-mz2hz  Yes because it shows you're not serious. Anybody who has read the Commission report or has even bothered to find out its purpose understands how this question is irrelevant. The job of the Commission report was to determine the events leading up to the attacks. The second the planes hit, that became the job of the NIST to detail, & they did just that with a specific study of WTC7 dedicated entirely to it. It's like asking why the Old Testament doesn't mention the Gospels.
    1
  47.  @BenWinder108  You were a child and are still clearly child-minded given the lunacy of what you believe. Only unlearned dullards with youtibe educations believe what you believe which is why you all gather here to desperately try to gather some form of confirmation bias. The reality however is that your ridiculous conspiracy theory completely fails under scrutiny. Regardless of what you believe, it DID indeed happen as we have been told it happened. Provide ANY evidence that shows otherwise.
    1
  48.  @noblecyborg-savage  Fortunately your baseless opinion doesn't count for anything and what you believe has no bearing or foundation in reality.
    1
  49.  @thomaseland3136  What a stupid generalisation which is of course completely untrue. Most people seem to distrust the US government, as do I. But that doesn't mean they're behind every bad thing that happens. Most people reject your dumb conspiracy for no other reason than it fails under scrutiny. You refuse to accept this because you're a conspiracy nut who's only concerned with conspiracy and therefore immediately rejects any facts or evidence that opposes your view. That's why rational people don't take people like you seriously and why you're forced to seek an echo-chamber of like-minded crackpot's in the comments sections of YouTube videos.
    1
  50. The exit hole in the Pentagon was mainly due to the landing gear which can be seen in the photographs. Obviously conspiracy sources don't want you to know this was the exit hole as it doesn't fit with their agenda. We have so much evidence confirming Flight 77 hit the Pentagon, it's insane for anybody to claim otherwise.
    1