Comments by "Sandy Tatham" (@sandytatham3592) on "The Israel Guys"
channel.
-
83
-
73
-
64
-
55
-
53
-
48
-
40
-
37
-
33
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
22
-
21
-
19
-
18
-
17
-
15
-
15
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@christopherdavidhughes8934 : I'm from New Zealand, and I support human and legal rights. Humanity has evolved considerably from solving disputes by "pushing back". That was the old tribal behaviour that Ben was talking about. Five or more Arab nations went to war against Israel in 1948, and again a few times after that, so it seems that a good many Arabs still felt the need to "drive them out from where they drove you out". That continues today, and is based on Islamic doctrine.
After the defeat of the Ottoman Empire in 1918, the League of Nations acknowledged the Jews as indigenous to historic Palestine and in 1922 the Jewish people were given the legal right to reconstitute their homeland. The non-Jewish occupants of the land were to be guaranteed freedom of religion, and equal rights under the law, which they have today. It took until 1947 amid a lot of hostility from Arabs before they could implement this right but eventually they founded the land of Israel.
The dismembered Middle East land of the Ottoman Caliphate was not retained by the victors of WWI but given to Arabs and Jews for self-determination. The Arabs got 99% of the land, countries today called Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, Jordan and Saudi Arabia. The Jews got less than 1% but they accepted that. And one-fifth of Israeli citizens are Arabs. That seems more than fair and reasonable to me. The displaced Arabs should have been resettled in neighbouring lands but the Arab League did not allow this because it wanted to weaponise the Palestinians in their fight (jihad) agains the Jews. UNRWA also keeps them as perpetual refugees for the same reason. Note: going to war against other nations, then losing those wars, has consequences!
4