Comments by "Sandy Tatham" (@sandytatham3592) on "The Israel Guys"
channel.
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@faiqsabri5264 : You don't seem to be clear on the definition of a 'terrorist organisation'. A terrorist targets people, often innocent civilians, with acts of violence, with a goal to bring about some larger ideological change. The IDF are not terrorists. They are practising self-defence and rule of law. If so-called 'Palestinians' have built homes without legal permission, then demolition is standard in ALL countries which enforce rule of law. If the home belongs to a convicted criminal, then some countries have laws which enable security forces to confiscate that property and do what they want with it, including demolishing it. If 'Palestinians' would agree to recognise that Israel is a legitimate nation, and agree to live with Israelis in peace, then the IDF would no longer be required to be involved inside Israel. They could focus on protecting the country from external enemies such as Iran, Hamas, Hezbollah, etc.
Do you live in the Palestinian Territories? What's your personal stake in this conflict? Do you want peace in the area?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Rob-t2e : Ancient Jewish tribes did live in today's west Jordan, south Lebanon, and Sinai, but the new country of Israel was restricted to the remaining land area of the British Mandate of Palestine. I suggest you watch the 5min PragerU video called "Does Israel Occupy the West Bank?" where international law professor Eugene Kontorovich outlines the legal precedents for establishing borders of new countries. I'm interested to know what you think of his explanation.
The founding of the Jewish state of Israel has nothing to do with which ethnic group was a majority. Remember that the Arabs of Palestine fought AGAINST the Allied Powers (which included the Jews and Arabs of the Hejaz) in WWI? Why would 'enemies' get to choose who ends up with what land after they lost that war in 1918? Why wouldn't the victorious British put people they trust in control of lands which had religious and strategic value to both the British and the Jewish people? They set this out in the 1917 Balfour Agreement, which was incorporated into the League of Nations mandate legislation in 1922.
The principle of "indigenous rights" was quite new back then but Israel is a success story, and it is the beginning of the rollback of Arab imperialism. I'm hopeful we will see more indigenous peoples such as the Kurds, Copts, Berbers-Amazigh, Assyrians, Nubians, Yazidis, etc. taking back control of their ancestral land... 🇮🇱🙏💙
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Mark-fo3if : Why does Israel extending sovereignty over Judea and Samaria have to result in ethnic cleansing? Today 21% of Israeli citizens are Arabs. They sit in the Knesset (they are Muslim Brotherhood members, no less!!!), in the judiciary, security services, education, banking, health, science, technology, etc. and they have equal rights with Jews. Find me ONE neighbouring Arab country that hasn't 'ethnically cleansed' the Jews, and pretty much all of their Christians? Find me ONE Muslim country that doesn't persecute homosexuals and apostates, and have horrible rights for females?
A practical solution can be found but it seems you'd like the so-called 'Palestinians' to be held in limbo with corrupt leadership and no chance of citizenship of a legitimate country. You'd prefer to keep using them as 'weapons' against the Jews? You don't like the idea of them being granted citizenship of an Arab country and then given long-term residence status in their homeland, with a path to full citizenship if they reject violence against the Jewish people? What's your personal stake in this?
1