Comments by "Mark Armage" (@markarmage3776) on "NowThis Impact" channel.

  1. 24
  2. 20
  3. 8
  4. 6
  5. 6
  6. 5
  7. 5
  8. 5
  9. 5
  10. She yelled 4 lies in a 1 minute span. 0:05, swath are drowning,it's a plant, not human and it's due to the flood, why don't you build a better flood treatment system. Floods happen every year, somes worse then the others. 2005, 2006,2001. So what? Banning all airplanes gonna stop the flood? 0:13 towns that will never recover or come back? This is another lie, what Ocasio miss about science is that after a period of time, the flood will stop, that's how they got through Katrina, apparently she doesn't know much. And when the flood went down, if applied, her deal would destroy any chance of rebuilding, you can't rebuild farms or buy machines because those things emissions carbon. So yeah, nice hypocrisy. 01:01 The kids from Bronx don't suffer from asthma due to carbon, if she knows again, science, carbon emission went to the atmosphere, they do suffer from dirty living environment, and they will continue once most of the parents are out of work because her "deal" eliminate cars. And like how she removed jobs from New York, again, nice hypocrisy. 01:07 , wow, just 6 seconds apart, the lead water crisis in Flint, it's due to poor water treatment. Lack of money, you use lead pipes to do it, that's why there is lead. But her deal will probably bankrupt the city, therefore making the problem even worse. They can't build new pipes anymore, because she will ban steel. Now that is again, hypocrisy. Does anybody who support her actually know anything? Go back to school, small time troll
    4
  11. 4
  12. 4
  13. 4
  14. 4
  15. 4
  16. 4
  17. 3
  18. 3
  19. 3
  20. 3
  21.  @acheybones588  How about this? Workers get paid for their labour and that alone? Minimum wage jobs are worthless, companies don't rely on it at all. If she quits, we can find a replacement easily. Her value of labour is minimum, we don't rely on it, she can quit, the company can find a replacement. No employees of fast food chain can work without people already paying millions to establish the fast food chains themselves. The point is here, the workers trade their minimum labor for wages, once they've made that deal, their labor is trade for the money. That is fair, what you're asking for is free money, not for their labor, but for whatever the owner makes, despite what the owner makes correlated with his own labor put into the business. You think Bill Gates contribution and a secretary contribution to Microsoft is the same? How about people who work full time jobs get paid what everybody would pay them? If somebody is full and debt, has massive medical issues, cancer, all of those, and that person works minimum wage, so to keep the job, the company has to pay that person millions to pay off the debt, to treat the cancer. Does that sound fair? You need to stop justification for stealing? There will always be minimum wage? If nobody ever accept to work there, how can it be? Here, pal, your whole theory is based on the minimum wage is not a living wage, how is it possible if people continue to work for that? They can just quit, they would have more time. God give us 24 hours a day, we trade the time for the labor and now we trade labor for wage. You quit, you have more time, spend it better. If everybody deems the minimum wage jobs slavery, they can just quit and the companies are forced to raise it, if those jobs are necessary. But apparently people still work for those jobs, because those people know that what they get is what they work for. People paid enough to live, they're not paid enough to live well, that's why it's called minimum wage, minimum to live, not minimum to live well. If a fast food chain worker can get enough to live well, what does an engineer gets? Private plane? Your whole thesis is ridiculous, especially when it's not your own money. You can go out, open a business, pay those people more money for the same labour, you put money in, you start the business, but the workers gets the pay they "want" without caring for what you "want".
    3
  22. 3
  23. 2
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39.  @acheybones588  No, they do not rely on burger flippers, because they can easily find other burger flippers anywhere. Here pal, it's not that they don't need people to do the job, they don't need people who requires more to do the same job because others are willing to do such jobs for the same price. If the burger flippers are so necessary, why don't the just quit? If their labor is so valuable, the company would have to raise the wage? By your logic, shouldn't the burger flippers be paid as high as the executives? Pal, think again, it's not the necessity of your job, it's the labor you can bring in, burger flippers provide minimum labor, anybody can do it, companies need burger flippers, but they don't need exactly those burger flippers. If all burger flippers in the world demand a higher wage, they shall raise it, but there are people who are willing to do for less, harsh reality. First off, who says that minimum wage jobs are fine of getting a house. That is massive luxury, pal, you need to check reality. Even the office workers in Asia can barely get a house in his lifetime, the Americans are living in a delusional bubble here. The American Dream is not for the minimum wage jobs, the theory behind minimum labor is that eventually you'll have to provide more than the minimum labor, working hard is not working the same thing over and over, working hard also includes working smart, start a business, small businesses, employ people, build a community those are the foundations of American Dream. American Dream has nothing to do with providing minimal labor and receive maximum benefits. The American Dream is for the ones who dare to take risk, American Dream is referring to how America is the land of opportunity, freedom to start business, all sorts of free trade, which you have to take risk for. It has nothing to do with just getting the lowest paying job available and still get a fine life. That is insane. You're wrong about the cost of living, the cost of living is food and clothing, not housing and healthcare, that is massive luxury. Check Asia, Somehow you're in the delusion in which burger flippers should be able to own houses, yeah, what reality is that? The minimum wage is enough to cover food, but housing, really? You're living in a bubble, when you think that minimum wage is enough to cover for housing or financial stability, you're in a bubble. The same nonsensical idea where housing is able to be paid just by minimum labor is one of the many factors which caused the 2008 sub-prime mortgage crisis, which led to the 2008 financial crisis. Keep lending money to people who are obviously unable to pay. So yeah, you define "cost of living" too luxuriously. Because if a burger flippers can get housing, what should an executives get? Private jet? By comparison, that's what it should be.
    2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46. 2
  47. 2
  48. 2
  49. 1
  50. 1