Comments by "神州 Shenzhou" (@Shenzhou.) on "CGTN" channel.

  1. 1
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. @ForrestSCS Westerners have long been predicting China's economic downfall. Here's a list: 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 2020. Forbes: Remember The China 'Hard Landing'? We Got One. ... But its already 2021, and China's economy is still going strong. So why continue to believe China's economy will fall, given that Western journalists predictions about China's collapse been proven consistently wrong for 31 years already?
    1
  10. @ForrestSCS If you want to look at history, China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this. Because this is what China's 5,000 years of history is telling us, that China functions best under a strong central government, like the Emperor and the Imperial Court of old. China's current authoritarian political closely emulates the ancient imperial system under President Xi Jinping and the Communist Party of China. And go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Burma (Myanmar), Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a Map of all the territory Taiwan claims (source:wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg ) Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34.  @kushio214  So you can compare GDP per capita (by dividing our GDP by our enormous population) then can't I use China's population to our advantage? Chinese universities produce the most STEM graduates (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) out of any other country in the world. Countries With The Most STEM Graduates 1. China (4.7 million) 2. India (2.6 million) 3. United States (568,000) 4. Russia (561,000) 5. Iran (335,000) 6. Indonesia (206,000) 7. Japan (195,000) ... Source: Forbes: The Countries With The Most STEM Graduates forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2017/02/02/the-countries-with-the-most-stem-graduates-infographic/ This implies that China is going to play a much larger role in the STEM fields, given the sheer number of graduates produced in these fields. In the grand scheme of things, China is only going to get better and better over the years. The HDI also compares two countries with the same level of GDP per capita that can end up with different human development outcomes, so isn't it linked to population size as well? Lastly, if you think that Japan or Taiwan could have built even longer train lines if they were the size of mainland China, then it's possible that their GDP per capita and HDI won't be as high as they are today, because of the sheer size of China's landmass. In 2003, China had 0km of high speed rail track, but today, China has more than double the track length of the rest of the world! Countries by high-speed rail lines in operation 1. China (38,207 km) 2. Spain (5,525 km) 3. Germany (4,692 km) 4. France (3,802 km) 5. Japan (3,421 km) 6. Sweden (2,055 km) 7. United Kingdom (1,757 km) ... Source: List of high-speed railway lines wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_high-speed_railway_lines#Overview
    1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1