Comments by "gwho" (@gwho) on "Asianometry" channel.

  1. communism is like trying to build a space elevator without knowing about gravity.
    20
  2. if you think linux is bloated imagine how bloated windows is.
    11
  3. DTCO is a fancy term for talking to the client, and is a crutch solution. While talking to the client is still necessary, and beneficial, it can and should be reserved for edge cases and critical design and wisdom, not holding their hand through the rote basics. The fabs could have categorized and tagged each rule better as required, optional, and quantifying what the tradeoffs are for the optional ones. Then they could make all this cataloguing searchable and self-explained via a simple web app, where the chip designers can reference, search, filter, sort rules easily by tag, and the quantified tradeoffs can be presented in a straightforward manner. Then DTCO can focus on the questions that really matter, and be a source of feedback, which continually gets incorporated into improving the web app for more rules, deprecating rules, etc.
    10
  4. i remember them on the news as a kid. actual brawls in the parliament/congress
    8
  5. now THIS is drama. geopolitical, career story, and historical drama.
    8
  6.  @BrendanRaymondKoroKoro  my point is if you don't account for something as critical and significant such as gravity when attempting to build a m ega-scale project, shit might, just might not work out
    7
  7.  @lusvus5445  you seem to actually believe that the country is democratic or something.
    4
  8. the national tax version of this is the Laffer curve. reducing tax rates actually increases tax revenue.
    3
  9. the degree to which countries embrace communism, they starve. the degree to which countries embrace capitalism, they prosper. every single country that flirted with communism, even china. yet people still believe in and try to usher in a communist revolution. people are so dumb.
    3
  10. "It's not money, it's a a tally kept track of at the government." "Well can I have some bread then?" "That will cost you 200 Rubles..."
    3
  11.  @francisdayon  how does a dictator increase economic prosperity? LAY out the steps. That's pure bs. Economics doesnt work that way at all
    3
  12. surprise surprise. communism causing mass starvation of one's own majority ethnic people. not holding my breath for "not-dicatatorial-i-promise", "not-coercive-i-promise" communism to overthrow "evil", "hierarchical", "feudalistic" capitalism
    3
  13.  @BrendanRaymondKoroKoro  nah that's some commy assumption that capitalism is doomed to fail. Marx was wrong about that and about socialism being the transition to communism, and about the labor theory of value, and about himself not being the word exploiter of hisaid and children.
    3
  14. "When you really start to let it sink in and analyse it, you realise that hard work in and of itself has no intrinsic value." generalized, "increasing inputs is not the goal; it's increasing outputs."
    3
  15. LMAO that's so fitting that a Korean company would be called Kimm lmao. In Korea, everyone is named Kim, even manufacturing companies AHHAAH (p.s. i'm korean)
    3
  16. this same video but for korea!
    3
  17. Korean born in USA and lived there my whole life. Korean pecking order, work culture, and social treatment scares the bejesus out of me if I were to live there. F that
    2
  18. how communists today think we should have communism is so beyond me. like open your fucking eyes to history.
    2
  19. for desktop computers and other applications that don't care about size as much (unlike cell phones and tablets), why do they need to shrink it down further instead of just making the chip bigger? serious question. Why does it always have to be that 3x3 cm CPU instead of a 15x15cm? if i can get 25x the computational power with the same fab (which translates to cost), i'll take 15x15cm CPU, wouldn't you?
    2
  20. every case of the same country being divided between liberal capitalism and communism, the capitalist one thrives and the communist one fails. west and east germany, south and north korea, taiwan and mainland china, post deng xiao ping capitalist reform china vs pre, etc etc etc.
    2
  21. With socialism, you run out of other people's money to steal I mean redistribute
    2
  22. with communism, the cure is worse than the illness. communist "reforms" did more harm than colonial "exploitation" ever did.
    2
  23. THis analysis assumes it just is so and ignores that if policies weren't set to give special privileges to modern "nobles", then the economy would have flourished better and the broader competition and would have cause even more growth. Taiwan saw more firms and the growth ofnthose firms avg be more didtibuted remember? And arguably, less competiion-blocking leads to getting more of all the people have to offer. You TsMc
    2
  24. to run communism, it always requires lying at its core
    2
  25. 0:20 no sense? You don't need to be a producer of crude oil to refine it. you can be the refiner in the globalized supply chain. not weird at all. only if you're dumb you'd think that's weird.
    2
  26. cultural revolution... great leap forward... god, talk about shooting yourself in the foot... communists deny the domestic genocide while praising it... talk about needing to save face leading to some stupid, stupid beliefs... all in the name of idiotic communism.
    2
  27. It's a meee: Ma Li O
    2
  28. 12:16 and that sums up the problem with communism and command economies, whether it's north korean wheat quotas or US mpg minimums. The degree to which government overrides bottom up decision-making is the degree to which the economy is cancerous instead of properly functioning cells in the organism.
    2
  29. 15:42 capitalists LOL-ing
    1
  30.  TacticalMoonstone  LMFAO!
    1
  31. 5:10 bruh. calling that a capitalist's dream is ridiculous. look beyond the capitalist stereotype perpetuated by marxists/communists and think more broadly about who actually wants to exploit... parents exploit their kids with confucianism. so do political leaders, especially kings and communist. what you described sounds rather soul-crushing and completely socially unfree, which goes far beyond economic exploitation, but personal and social and mental control. Not even capitalists go that far, that's a dictator's dream. With capitalism, you can actually see how giving a better deal to who you work with (shareholders, managers, employees, suppliers, customers,etc) can yield you yourself more benefit too - alignment of interests, aka win-win.
    1
  32. Communists cant even get along with comminists. What makes them so sure that once capitalism is defeated that their world will be better, let alone functional?
    1
  33. this video... business, technology, geopolitics, economics all rolled into one.
    1
  34. my dad was a programmer but didn't expose me to it, teach me it, or even tell me what it even is my whole life.
    1
  35. can you imagine advocating for dicatorships after seeing such scandals? like how do you think concentrating power and removing checks and balances won't make corruption entrenched and skyrocket, like russia? silly communists.
    1
  36.  @5353Jumper  you should read up on natural monopolies vs other kinds.
    1
  37.  @5353Jumper  good luck getting a mythical non-corrupt government. you seem to forget that government is by definition a geographic monopoly on force, a rather immoral and corrupt power to begin with, at the foundation of everything else it does.
    1
  38. it isn't the founding fathers who planned any of this. It's the otter kingdom that's really pulling the strings behind the Singaporean economy and government. Queen OLIVIAAA!
    1
  39. The woke may do exactly the same thing if we I dulge them too much, and let them grab power
    1
  40.  @dancoulson6579  communists love to make lots of cheap shit
    1
  41. most power plants are coal. quantify before you catastrophize.
    1
  42.  @siavash2176  well said!
    1
  43.  @siavash2176  if one knows how bitcoin works at the technical level and are aware of philosophically dissecting its monetary properties, this becomes the natural, obvious response to environment criticisms about bitcoin
    1
  44.  @siavash2176  there are oh so many things that are bigger wastes of energy for the value they produce in the world. striking down bad regulatory policies would do unfathomably more. allowing thorium molten salt reactors, for example. then youd' have enough energy to do so many more things, of which global bitcoin mining would be a drop in the bucket of what thorium reactors would produce
    1
  45. treating the process of creating architected chips as process architecture to be optimized is some awesome meta-application and applied efficiency
    1
  46.  @francisdayon  that's bs
    1
  47.  @justcommenting4981  that's literally the opposite of anarchy. you just conflated authoritarianism with libertarianism. smh. i hear anti corporate and conflation with imperialism all the time from the left. they're just baseless assertions. governments are the ones that make monopolies possible, distort and prohibit competition, and create 100x the problems you think corporations cause. giant eyeroll.
    1
  48. i tend to agree. the real slapping a sticker on things is saying it was built on sound economic principles without any details.
    1
  49.  @mcs699  or he's playing the middle of the road fallacy, finding baseless nice things about the soviet union just to seem more nuanced and fair
    1
  50. 1:40 differential equations is easier than the calculus you first learn. there are a lot fewer concepts, and a lot fewer variations to memorize. centralized communist economy fails again. BIG surprise >.>
    1