Comments by "andrew worth" (@andrewworth7574) on "Candace Owens" channel.

  1. It's sad that Candace has fallen for Sibrel's snake oil pitch.
    21
  2. The footage that Bart claims was secret, (actually was in an internal report on the mission, not secret) was originally taken from a 35 minute long live public network broadcast. Everything Bart describes as hidden from the public was in the broadcast, and much more.
    19
  3.  @viera4  and no amount of evidence.
    15
  4. "The lie has captured us" Sibrel's lies have captured many.
    15
  5. Nothing happens the way Sibrel claims.
    12
  6. @ClayCarson-t2l  what amazes me is the hubris of people making judgements without any knowledge, and accepting Sibrel's claims without question.
    10
  7. @Blue-hf7xt  Sibrel is no journalist, he's a grifter.
    9
  8. Sibrel lies as a matter of routine.
    9
  9. Yes, the descent stages and hardware left on the moon has been photographed in recent years by lunar orbiters from several countries.
    9
  10. @jodiealbers1801  you believe Sibrel's claims, his claims were never true. Sibrel's critics have looked at his claims in detail and found them without foundation. In fact, several of his claims can only be lies.
    8
  11. You should check Sibrel's claims against other sources before accepting them as factual.
    8
  12. @marykendle4544  there's nothing insightful about falling for Sibrel's fantasies. Quite the opposite, more like naivety.
    8
  13. If you look at the material debunking Sibrel's claims, you'll realize the betrayal is by Sibrel.
    8
  14. @MarekzAnglii  the question from Patrick Moore was, "Could they see stars when they were looking at the solar corona?" They couldn't. They couldn't see stars from the lunar surface. It was only when the command module was in the moons' shadow, or when they were looking through the optics, that they could see stars. There were no contradictions, only a failure by the conspiracy theorists to understand the context of the question and the context of the answers.
    7
  15. Sibrel's claims are easily refuted. Which is why he recently said that he will not debate anyone with the knowledge to challenge his claims.
    7
  16. SpaceX has successfully launched 134 rockets, mostly Falcon 9's, so far this year.
    7
  17. @tammycrisel8692  I prefer interviewers who challenge their guests' claims. With Sibrel, Candace is like a loyal puppy.
    7
  18. It's called a flight of fantasy.
    7
  19. A scientists way of doing things: Do the research, then based on the evidence, reach a conclusion. Sibrel's way: reach a conclusion, then go look for any evidence that can be dreamed up to support that conclusion, ignoring any evidence that's inconvenient to the cause.
    6
  20. Your husband is correct. Sibrel avoids interviewers with enough knowledge to seriously challenge his claims.
    6
  21. There isn't a single claim he makes that I can't refute, explaining why his claim is nonsense.
    6
  22. You're referring to the Kelly Smith video. Smith is an engineer working on hardening the Orion capsules electronics against radiation, specifically the video focuses on an unmanned test flight of Orion, and he says "we must solve these problems before we send humans through this region of space". Meaning the problems he's working on, on the spacecraft he's working on, must be solved before that spacecraft can be used to send people through that region of space. He's an engineer, not a doctor, he's talking about the issues he's dealing with, which have nothing to do with the direct effects of radiation on people, rather, he's referring to the threat to people on board that a failure of his electronics would pose.
    6
  23. They discussed his experiences going to the moon, then she asked him why no one's been back since? He was answering that question, though he was a bit rambling in his reply.
    6
  24. Unmanned
    6
  25. ​​ @tylerd7330 nasa was established in 1958, explorers like Abel Tasman and James Cook were navigating their way around the globe centuries earlier. There are plenty of commentators on YouTube that refute you other claims, I suggest Dave McKeegan.
    6
  26. ​@isaiahbucur the radiation isn't "insane", specifically what radiation are you talking about? A vacuum doesn't have a temperature, that's why vacuum flasks are such good insulators. The spacesuits had an internal pressure of about 4psi, that's very little pressure, about a quarter of the air pressure at sea level.
    6
  27. @robymaru03  The Selene spacecraft from Japan - photos of evidence of landings. Chandrayaan-2 from India. Photos of hardware at landing sites. Change 2 from China. China confirms seeing evidence of Apollo landings but hasn't released photos. Danuri from South Korea. Photos of hardware at landing sites. An of course there's Nasa's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, which has taken many photos of all 6 of the landing sites.
    6
  28. So many of these comments feel like they're from people literally living in a different reality.
    6
  29. "ALSEP was a collection of geophysical instruments designed to continue to monitor the environment of each Apollo landing site for a period of at least a year after the astronauts had departed. Designed for a life of one year (Apollo 17 was for two), they ended up working for up to 8 years, the experiments permanently shut down by Mission Control on 30 September 1977." So there's your radio becon.
    6
  30. Almost everyone with tertiary qualifications in math, physics and engineering know the moon landings happened. It's the scientifically uneducated that fantasize over that conspiracy theory.
    6
  31. Your cell phone service is pretty crap then. The answers to your other questions are easy to find, why haven't you even looked for the answers?
    6
  32. You were duped by Sibrel. All his claims are manufactured, there isn't one that isn't easily refuted.
    6
  33. The Nasa of today is not the Nasa of 60 years ago.😢
    6
  34. If you're looking for truth, don't expect any from Sibrel.
    6
  35. Some claim Santa is real.
    6
  36. So what is a reliable source? Wiki has the attribute of at least providing the sources it uses.
    6
  37. He's a grifter and conman.
    5
  38. Trump is smart enough not to buy Sibrel's nonsense.
    5
  39.  @NataliaBenoit-bd6kh  fire any of Sibrel's claims at me and I'll address them. Sibrel avoids talking to people who seriously challenge his claims.
    5
  40.  @Lostartsradio  I detest those who spread lies and misinformation. Sibrel has never been interviewed by someone knowledgeable enough to challenge his claims. If you disagree, cite an interview where the interviewer was knowledgeable.
    5
  41. Not buying Sibrel's James Bond fairytale.
    5
  42. It's wild because it's fantasy. Sibrel has recently said that he will not debate anyone with the knowledge to challenge his claims.
    5
  43. There have been many unmanned missions to the moon since Apollo. The cost of crewed missions is very high, with insufficient benefits to any country to justify them. Apollo only happened because beating the Soviet Union to the moon became a national goal for the US, with the American people willing to support such massive spending.
    5
  44. Sibrel lies throughout the video. His accusations of lying against others are just demonic.
    5
  45. The footage wasn't faked, and to those who understand what to expect in 1/6 gravity and a vacuum, it doesn't look fake. What do you think is evidence that it's fake?
    5
  46. Lunar orbiters from China, India, Japan and South Korea have confirmed the existence of the landing sites.
    5
  47. Remember that Capricorn 1 was a fictional movie? That Brolin and Simpson were actors acting?
    5
  48. No more lies? But Sibrel was lying about once a minute!
    5
  49. I can refute every one of Sibrel's claims. Sibrel avoids debating anyone who could seriously challenge his claims.
    5
  50. ​​ @isaiahbucur the US manned space program started first with Mercury, a one man capsule to get basic experience. It transitioned to Gemini, a two man capsule that could maneuver, conduct rendezvous and space walks, then to Apollo, the 3 man capsule. There were a least 3 Apollo missions prior to the Apollo 11 moon landing. These did further testing and development of the systems to conduct landings.
    5