Comments by "andrew worth" (@andrewworth7574) on "Candace Owens" channel.

  1. ​ @isaiahbucur the claims of vast amounts of equipment and knowledge lost are a Sibrel lie. What has been lost is the will to publicly finance lunar missions, the technology "lost" is equivalent to the technology that's been lost that was used to produce 1960's Ford's and 1960's transistor radios, it would take years to manufacture the equipment that was used in the 1960's to produce those things, the knowledge is still there, the hardware is not.
    5
  2. ​ @isaiahbucur I know of Sibrel's claims and background, he's a grifter, and you've fallen for his grift. Literally none of his claims haven't been refuted.
    5
  3. ​ @gives_bad_advice suit pressure 3.7psi
    5
  4. No one was filming the landing from outside the spacecraft, there's no such film.
    5
  5. If people went around claiming that you're a fraudster, a coward, and liar, would you be pissed?
    5
  6. Amazing how people take the word of one man, who offers no verified support for his claims, over the vast quantities of verified evidence supporting the 6 manned moon landings.
    5
  7. @kaone3151  you don't understand basic physics, it's not the fall that ends you, it's the sudden stop at the bottom. It's not the speed, it's the acceleration/deceleration.
    5
  8. @kaone3151  are you still in school?
    5
  9. @kaone3151  given that the Soviet Union acknowledged the moon landings happened at the time, and that spacecraft from China, Japan, India and South Korea have confirmed the existence of the lunar landing sites in recent years with photos, I'd say there is a lot of evidence that the lunar landings are real. You still have offered no evidence to the contrary.
    5
  10. He lives comfortably because he's gets money through his grifting. If you mean he should be in fear of his life. Well, in that case, your dilemma is explained. He isn't exposing any conspiracy, just telling fantasy stories. The CIA doesn't concern itself with people's fantasies.
    5
  11. Sibrel has never questioned an astronaut politely.
    5
  12. You should do that research, and then you'll discover that your closed minded conclusions are wrong.
    5
  13. Don't be sad, Sibrel made up the evidence he offers. His claims are all easily refuted. He has recently stated that he will not debate anyone with the knowledge to challenge his claims. That's why he gets away with his grift.
    5
  14. The comparison with the 17 minute video of the whole discussion illustrates how the deniers of the lunar landings will edit to lie.
    5
  15. All of Sibrel's claims have been refuted. Ask me about any of them.
    5
  16. There was a camera mounted on the outside of the lander. Look it up.
    5
  17. God has given us the ability to think for ourselves. You choose not to.
    5
  18. Actor Tom Mayk, producer T Patrick Murray.
    5
  19. blueprints and other plans for the Saturn V rocket are available on microfilm at the Marshall Space Flight Center. The Saturn V at the Johnson space center is entirely genuine, all components of it are certified for flight.
    5
  20. Your points are all rationalizations and misrepresentations. Why would we have high quality photos of the landing sites by now? There's no evidence that Nasa gave anyone any fake moon rocks, despite having been handing out thousands of samples to institutions around the world for experiments and scientific tested for over 50 years.
    5
  21. ​@JONCHAIDEZ there isn't a single person who's studied the Van Allen Belts who says that they were impassable.
    5
  22. Pettit says we went to the moon. The press conference was over an hour long. Watch it all before reaching conclusions about how the astronauts handled it.
    5
  23. Sibrel has made a fool of her, and you, and you don't even know it.
    5
  24. If you live in a rural area where city lights don't drown out the stars, satellites are easy to see. Most notable are the ISS and Starlink trains of satellites, easily visible if they pass overhead shortly before dawn or soon after dusk, when you're in darkness but they, at their altitude, are still illuminated by the sun.
    5
  25. Three of the astronauts did swear on the Bible for Sibrel, Sibrel still called them liars. There isn't a claim Sibrel makes that isn't easily refuted, for example the shadows from rocks photo he claims as absolute proof. Anyone can reproduce that photo in their backyard any sunny morning. Many people have.
    5
  26. Rogozen was 5 when Apollo 11 landed on the Moon. None of the Apollo missions lasted more than 12 days, astronauts/cosmonauts that suffer the physical issues you mention have been in zero g for weeks or months.
    5
  27. So you think robotic spacecraft visiting other planets are impossible? Voyager 1 and 2 are 60,000 times as far from us as the moon and still in communication.
    5
  28. Sibrel's claims are easily refuted. Which is why he recently stated that he will not debate anyone with the knowledge to challenge his claims.
    5
  29. If you're capable of looking at the opposing evidence, I suggest watching Dave McKeegan's refutations of Sibrel's claims.
    5
  30. Aldrin has never said they didn't go to the moon.
    5
  31. Everyone whose studied the evidence in detail.
    5
  32. What questions would you like them to answer?
    5
  33. "Once you give a charlatan power over you, you never get it back" So says Sibrel, the charlatan.
    5
  34. They were examined and tested by scientists in over 130 countries.
    5
  35. Oh, Sibrel is the chief hoaxer.
    5
  36. There had been unmanned spacecraft sent to Mars, the X15 had reached 4500mph and the SR71 was flying at Mach 3. All before Apollo 11. What's wrong with 1960's technology?
    5
  37. Yep, Sibrel has honed his story well. But if you're familiar with his claims and the reality of the missions and science, the holes in his stories, which include outright lies, are obvious.
    5
  38. The lies are that Armstrong didn't walk on the moon. Is that what you're teaching her?
    5
  39. Propaganda from your church
    5
  40. The people who hop on the conspiracy bandwagon have no understanding of the science and engineering involved in building Apollo and going to the Moon. After decades of being involved Sibrel should know, but he never debates anyone knowledgeable, he never responds to serious refutations of his claims, many of the claims he makes demonstrate a lack of knowledge of the basic science and engineering involved in Apollo.
    5
  41. Surprisingly, they weren't using cell phones to talk to the astronauts on the moon, they were using nasa's deep space communication and tracking system, with 200 foot radio dishes aimed at the moon.
    5
  42. ​@johnnydlux50 you should watch the entire news conference, and without someone in our ear feeding you a false narrative. No one who's studied the Van Allen Belts claims that they were impassable for the astronauts.
    5
  43. So, over 50 years later and you still haven't managed to find the answers for your easily answered questions??
    5
  44. No one has silenced Sibrel in 20 years, or, in reality, tried to.
    5
  45. The original broadcast from about 2 hours 33 minutes. https://youtu.be/79aCn2hWezo?si=J874VuZiC2LYquti
    5
  46. You'll probably not believe me, but the first transatlantic radio communication happened in 1901. That was actually more challenging than sending an equivalent message to the moon, because the planet Earth happened to be between Europe and America.
    5
  47. @chazaq2010  you really need to look up what they were doing with radio in the 40's, 50's and 60's. You're apparently under the impression that it was first developed about the time you were born.
    5
  48. It's unfortunate that he makes so many untrue claims, about 1 a minute.
    5
  49. Yep, Sibrel lies continuously. To get away with it, he's explained that he will not debate anyone with the knowledge to challenge his claims.
    5
  50. Are they not indisputably real? What evidence do you offer that disputes them?
    5