Comments by "andrew worth" (@andrewworth7574) on "Candace Owens" channel.

  1. How is such narcissism created? You know nothing of the science involved but are convinced of your own greater wisdom. Such incredible hubris.
    5
  2. You didn't even bother to Google for an explanation, you just swallowed the grifters fairytale.
    5
  3. Did Sibrel convince you with his lies?
    5
  4. We've never been back because you have never put up the billions to go back, nor has anyone else.
    5
  5. How do you know to judge the radiation is high enough to make the belts impassable?
    5
  6. @backinmyrightmind  no scientist, who has studied the Van Allen Belts, has ever claimed they are impassable.
    5
  7. I can't believe so many people fall for Sibrel's lies. But there you have it.
    4
  8. Bizarre, you claim to "know they're lying" while also claiming "we know nothing".
    4
  9. Don't confuse rationalizations and ignorance with common sense.
    4
  10. Bart Sibrel is a grifter, and you were tricked into financing his fraud.
    4
  11.  @NataliaBenoit-bd6kh  Trump will have nothing to do with Sibrel, Musk will have nothing to do with Sibrel. Sibrel lies through his teeth. He never even addresses the refutations of his claims, he ignores evidence that contradicts his nonsense. You fire any of his claims at me, or any of the others challenging his nonsense in these comments, and we will have no trouble addressing each and ever point of his you raise.
    4
  12.  @NataliaBenoit-bd6kh  the nicest thing I can say about Sibrel is that he reminds me of snakes.
    4
  13. You're referring to a mockumentary produced by T Patrick Murray that featured Tom Mayk as Stanley Kubrick.
    4
  14. Sibrel's claims are easily refuted, I doubt you have anything better to offer.
    4
  15.  @Lostartsradio  "paid well" grow up. Should others accuse you of being paid by Sibrel?
    4
  16. ​ @Lostartsradio Dave McKeegan has a video up that addresses some (not all) of Sibrel's falsehoods.
    4
  17. Sibrel? The truth? Nothing Sibrel says should be assumed to be the truth. Someone should chase him around with a Bible.
    4
  18. Apparently, you think there's a massive conspiracy with hundreds of thousands lying - with none of them spilling the beans.
    4
  19. There isn't a claim Sibrel makes that isn't easily refuted.
    4
  20. ​ @kimberleesimmering6228 Sibrel is the one feeding you lies.
    4
  21. You first.
    4
  22. Sibrel's 007 stories are as fictional as the rest of his claims.
    4
  23. Bart never takes on interviews with people who have the knowledge to challenge his claims, and he has stated that he will not do such interviews. That's because his lies only work against people who know nothing of the science and engineering involved.
    4
  24.  @briantitchener4829  "who were they" Bean, Mitchell and Cernan. Didn't stop Sibrel calling them liars.
    4
  25. Sibrel is the liar.
    4
  26.  @lindysaltwell9628  at the end of his interview with Rogan, Rogan suggested to Sibrel that he line up a debate between Sibrel and someone more knowledgeable, Sibrel's reply was "sure". About a month ago Sibrel had an interview with Bob Frantz, Frantz referenced Rogan's suggestion of a debate, asking Sibrel if it was on the agenda. After much dodging and wriggling, Sibrel came out and said that he will not debate anyone with the knowledge to challenge his claims. His justification was that people who have the knowledge to challenge his claims are just "boyscouts". The implication being that debating them would be beneath him.
    4
  27. The moon landing vehicle (lunar module) doesn't come back to Earth, the descent stages are all sitting on the moon where they landed, the ascent stages all crashed into the moon after bringing the 2 moon walkers back to the command module.
    4
  28. The flag only moves when the astronauts are touching the flagpole.
    4
  29. The high IQ people are able to interrogate the narratives that they'd like to believe as thoroughly as they interrogate the narratives that they find unappealing.
    4
  30. The former is simpler, the latter, faking it, requires the secret to have been kept for 60 years against billions of people and the cooperation of the Soviet Union, Japan, India, China South Korea, and many others from outside of Nasa who tracked the 9 flights that went to the moon.
    4
  31. He was patched through the two-way radio connection mission control was using to talk to the astronauts. It's not rocket science.
    4
  32. Communications with the moon is the easy part, it's bending radio waves around the earth. Getting them to go through obstacles that's tricky. That's why direct satellite to mobile phone is going to replace all the cellphone towers littering the countryside.
    4
  33. Sibrel lies through his teeth about the Apollo 1 tragedy.
    4
  34. Sibrel is a grifter, there's nothing he's said that hasn't been refuted. Even his claims on why Aldrin punched him have been refuted - by Sibrel's own video of the incident.
    4
  35. There isn't a single claim Sibrel makes that isn't easily refuted.
    4
  36. Musk knows we landed on the moon.
    4
  37. @Jessicad9304  anyone can reproduce the appearance of nonparallel shadows with a couple of items like those rocks, I've done it, so have others. There isn't a single person who's studied the Van Allen Belts who says that they were impassable for the Apollo astronauts. The 'secret' video was taken from 2 TV broadcasts done at the time, a 15 minute unscheduled broadcast when they were 50,000 nautical miles out on day 1, and a 35 minute sceduled broadcast on day 2 when they were 130,000 nautical miles out. Those complete broadcasts prove Sibrels claims false. And that the filming was actually through a square window. The word "talk"(?) is heard on the day 1 broadcast, at that distance from Earth the delay is 0.65 seconds, throughout that 15 minute broadcast the delay between Capcom and the astronauts IS less than a second.
    4
  38. @Jessicad9304  the reason why they could do the moon missions with far less mass than the original proposals (or Elon's more recent plans) is because of the radically different mission architecture. The Saturn V stack of Apollo had 7 distinct stages to get them 2 the moon and back, all but the last, the command module, we're thrown away during each mission, the other proposals involved high levels of reusability. Von Braun's original included an entire construction space station in Earth orbit.
    4
  39.  @Jessicad9304  Sibrel has recently stated that he will not debate anyone with the knowledge to challenge his claims. That's why you'll see him talking to friendly nonexperts like Candace and Rogan, never his critics like Tim Dodds or any scientist or engineer who's studied the Apollo's program.
    4
  40. I think Rogan really struggled on unfamiliar territory. Rogan even suggested there needed to be a debate between Sibrel and someone more qualified. A couple of weeks ago, when asked about that by another YouTuber, Sibrel stated that he will not debate anyone with the knowledge to challenge his claims.
    4
  41. Sibrel has to ignore great swaths of evidence to argue his case.
    4
  42. The word "firmament", to non flat earthers (95% of the population) and modern engineers and scientists like Von Braun, just means the expanse of the universe.
    4
  43. ​@SkepticAurora flat Earthers think everyone else is more ignorant than they. They imagine there are only a few smarter than they are and that those few smart people are in on it. Ask them how it is that there's a pressure gradient in the atmosphere, or how it is that tens of thousands of vessels, including small yachts, cross oceans navigating on the globe and get to their destinations in the time and across the distances the crew expect and the flat earther will run away.
    4
  44. It's Sibrel making the fake claims.
    4
  45. Why would it be impossible?
    4
  46. You've never seriously examined the evidence against the moon landings. If you do, you find Sibrel's claims fall to pieces like wet paper.
    4
  47. After a good holiday, returning to normal life can be a downer. But they weren't glum, they were in debrief mode, trying to offer concrete data, rather than teenage excitement, and that is as would be expected from test pilots.
    4
  48. ​@LOADING...o.o.o we know there are people who in recent years, have paid modest amounts to visit the Titanic, that cost does not compare to the cost of manned lunar missions.
    4
  49. ​ @suzanneportch113 you watch Tom Mayk in a mockumentary.
    4
  50. As someone who's studied the Flat Earther madness for 10 years. I can confirm that it only survives due the its adherents hubris.
    4