Comments by "MarcosElMalo2" (@MarcosElMalo2) on "Patrick Boyle"
channel.
-
@whutcat682 See, this is how I can tell you know zero about real estate financing. The 30-year fixed rate mortgage is what enabled many Americans to buy homes since the 1930s, while we were still recovering from a depression. Go look up Fannie Mae, Freddy Mac, and the National Housing Act of 1934. If your parents or grandparents own homes, it’s because government agencies encouraged lenders to make loans on such generous terms. Your inability to buy a home has nothing to do with 30-year terms. You can’t buy one because of two reasons: 1) you’re not making enough money, and 2) you don’t have a down payment. There’s also a possible third reason, that your credit is bad.
It’s a GOOD thing to have the cost of your home broken up into 360 manageable payments rather than 120 less manageable payments that are almost 3x higher. Or worse, paying the interest for 10 years and a balloon payment at the end.
You have my sympathy. Because house prices are so high, it’s extremely difficult for many Americans to get financing for houses. But if you ever want to be a homeowner, you better learn basic financial math (like why a 30-year mortgage is better than a 10 year mortgage). And you should avoid showing off your ignorance about finance. A closed mouth catches no flies.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@koltoncrane3099 It’s a quandary, isn’t it? I think the best we can do is to offset our participation with more participation. Do your elected representatives know your, Kolton Crane’s, feelings on the topic? This might sound corny, but have you ever written a letter to your congressperson or your state’s senators? Did you know that elected representatives’ staffers tally constituent opinions, and assign different weights depending on how you communicate your opinion? One snail mail letter is equal to 100 phone calls is equal to 1000 emails was the formula I was told. Or that one letter represents the views of 10,000 voters (don’t quote me on the number, but you get the idea). Nobody uses snail mail anymore, which makes it more effective.
I’m not saying that such activity wipes the slate clean, but it’s a start. We do what we can. Part of doing what we can is figuring out what to do. Another part is overcoming our natural tendency towards laziness.
I hope this helps. I’m doing what I can, but I’m not a saint or martyr. I hope you are also doing what you can.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@itsallminor6133 I’ll say this. Trump knows how to normalize a crazy or extreme idea. And I hate to ever admit Trump has a point, there are real reasons why it would be a good idea to colonize Greenland: climate change.
I’m assuming we’ve pretty much given up on halting, slowing, or controlling AGW. Greenland is going to increase in value exponentially as more habitable land and exploitable is uncovered by melting glaciers. Greenland becomes a very attractive target for expansionists countries. Trump just called first dibs. And if we can’t have it, no one else (other than the Greenlanders) gets it.
Similar logic for Canada, although it’s extremely, extremely unlikely that the U.S. will take over Canada or absorb it. I’m not saying it will never happen—Canada would see benefits. But the point is that Trump’s nutty ideas are forcing us to examine the U.S.-Canada relationship and the assumptions upon which it is based. And that could lead to positive change.
Personally, I think Canada, the U.S., and Mexico need greater economic cooperation and trade with each other, for security reasons as much as economic or any other reasons. Trumpian clownery and Trumpian chaos might actually accelerate the process of unifying our economies.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1