Comments by "MarcosElMalo2" (@MarcosElMalo2) on "Zeihan on Geopolitics" channel.

  1. 1
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7.  @garedmorort  setting aside calling each other racist (we’ll get back to that in a moment), there is a large bloc on the U.S. right that claims that immigration is ruining the country—they’ve been making the claim for more than 40 years. There has been a continual push and pull within the right wing and within the GOP between the anti-immigrants and those that see immigration as a net positive. Over the last ten years, the anti-immigrationists have won. Here is something that might sound familiar to you. A lot of immigration from Central America is driven by conditions that America had a hand in creating, meddling in the politics and supporting authoritarian dictators. France has a similar situation, no? Many immigrants are coming from countries that were once colonial subjects of France or some other European power. The point is that our immigration problems are problems of our own making. I’m not anti-American or an “America is always wrong” type. U.S. meddling might have been a mistake but it was a counter to Soviet meddling in Latin America in the context of the Cold War. We didn’t want another Cuba in Latin America, especially not in Central America. That doesn’t excuse our mistakes, it just puts into context how we should be reckoning with immigration. And we should note that the U.S. conferred legal immigration status to those who were fleeing communist countries while making illegal those who were fleeing our brutal dictator allies. All that said, the anti-immigrant faction in the U.S. is mostly racist and part of larger racist authoritarian movement. They turn a blind eye to the majority of illegal immigration which comes from Europe and Asia, and freak out about the southern border.
    1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32.  @thedukeofchutney468  The Maduro Regime feeds the poor, and that is why Maduro is “popular” among the poor. If you want to eat, you come to his rallies and show support for the United Socialist Party. The middle class is the biggest part of the population that is being starved (taking a cue from the Soviets of the 20s and 30s) and devastated. They are the largest part that is fleeing their country. (Economically they are now just as impoverished as any one else, but they are still considered members of an enemy class.) The political opposition is persecuted both officially by the government security apparatus, the military and unofficially by paramilitary gangs of thugs. Peter is right to talk about the famine, but it’s important to remember that the Venezuelans fleeing the criminal socialist dictatorship of Maduro are political asylum seekers, not economic immigrants. The Central Americans are a slightly different story. They endured decades of U.S. interference in their politics during the Cold War. I’m not one of the “blame America” contingent. There were serious concerns about Communism on our doorstep, and the Soviets were materially supporting rebellions. I just think we handled it badly on the whole. Long story short, we had a hand in creating instability in Central America, which allowed organized crime to gain a toe hold. The thousands of Central Americans fleeing the violent crime in their countries is what you call “blowback”, the unintended consequences of our foreign policy.
    1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. It’s been my understanding that Hamas is sponsored by Iran (or one of the ruling factions in Iran, such as the Revolutionary Guards). And as far as Iran is concerned, it’s already Mission Accomplished. There’s no need to stick their necks out as their goals have been mostly met: to stir up conflict between Israel and Palestine when there had been some movement towards peace and to make Israel look bad. The Iranians intent was to provoke a reaction. So it seems that the Iranians are hanging Hamas out to dry. Maybe they were hoping for a stronger reaction from Israel, i.e., indiscriminate bombing of civilians, but they’re settling for some civilian deaths because that’s what happens when war is waged in densely populated areas. Here’s the thing about conditions in Gaza and the West Bank: 1) the West Bank is governed by the Palestinian Authority, the moderate faction of the PLO when the PLO broke apart. And the PA and Israel have been cooperating, which has lead to improvement in the lives of those Palestinians. 2) Israel began some time ago to thaw relations with its former enemies (most notably Saudi Arabia) and changed their policy on Israeli settlement of the occupied West Bank. They’ve begun to dismantle the settlements and arresting those hardcore settlers who refuse to leave. They’ve done this as gestures of good faith as they seek to normalize diplomatic relations with their former enemies, and those former enemies have stopped supporting anti-Israel militants. That’s the larger context to remember here. Israel, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Egypt, etc., recognize that Iran is the real threat. They’re moving towards formal diplomatic relations and perhaps a formal alliance. (And yes, the centuries old Sunni/Shiite split is in play here.) Iran is trying to break this up.
    1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1