Comments by "CynicalBroadcast" (@CynicalBastard) on "Trump Admin to Reaffirm Gender is Dichotomous and Genetic" video.

  1. That's what the world does, provide oil to squeeky wheels.
    8
  2. When are people gonna get that they are using the word Gender in the second sense, and not the first, when discussing fluidity. It's just like the video Styx just made, about how confuse An-Caps for Libertarians, because they both use the term and ideogram <Libertarian> to denote themselves, even though they are two separate concepts these two groups are endorsing? Ask yourself, does this make sense, or no?
    4
  3. It's actually not complicated to see that some people whom want to talk amongst themselves are being told their lingo isn't "real" (even if it is as real as anything else delineated through language in and of itself), by "outsiders" to their group dynamic. If only they could realize that to maintain that dynamic they have to keep to themselves and not foist their delineations onto others, through law. Indeed. But no one is even trying to meet anyone half-way, and frankly, neither side understands eachother at all, when they could, if only they refused to allow themselves to be dumb, and instead work together on their problems. But it's only "one way or the highway" when it comes to any in-group, it seems. Oh well. It's sad because the human race continues to prove itself ineffective at grasping rational concepts.
    3
  4. Agreed.
    3
  5. Gender is a word that connotes to more than sexulity, genius. Oh man, how do people live and breath in this climate of stupidity? Gender also refers to GRAMMATICAL GENDER, it's a word that's been used by grammarians for centuries.
    2
  6. Sexuality is dimorphic, and thus, so is gender. You even just admitted it.
    2
  7. Everyone has the tendency, in groups, to go too far.
    2
  8. Neither is religion, nor politics.
    2
  9. Genetic factors show that people like to indulge in strange sexuality. Weird.
    1
  10. Failure to thrive & extinction is a condition met by species when they fail to meet the criteria for survival. Guess what...it happens.
    1
  11. Gender is not word invented by "French Marxists".
    1
  12. No we're getting somewhere. I apologize for my bad behavior. THAT..."sex did not describe behavior" is the most backwards and literally untrue thing I've ever read, and some leftists promoted that idea? Holy mother of pearl. They of all people should know this line of reasoning to be false. Sex describes THEIR behavior. I was just talking to someone about "political agendas" (and how either or side vies for their agendas), and I can clearly see this delineation. Sex is influencing the behavior around this agenda of theirs. Surely. But to say there is "no progression of usage" is blatant hypocrisy. Clearly there is a progression of usage, they made one! Sex doesn't describe behavior? I'd say this behavior is described not only through sex but their agenda, as well. All is twain! Good talk. PS: I still don't think you've encapsulated the entirety of the truth here, but you've encapsulated something- I won't deny your story at face value, I don't operate that way. So I do believe your story....will read more on it. I just don't buy that English can't "work that way". English is extremely malleable. PPS: Judith Butler is ... not my favorite kind of intellectual, by the by.
    1
  13. You're all ridiculous. You think things are "concrete" when they are "static". History, anthropology, science, logic, everything, indeed, proves this.
    1
  14. stares in the mirror A fucking dragon.... LOL Oh yeah...Styx...I should have figured you'd delineate this obvious shenanigans. Obviously this isn't going to de-citizen Americans. But it's rhetoric that will inflame groups who genuinely wish to see transgender people dead, or something. So....Oh well.
    1
  15. It's not even a matter for the government, so good.
    1
  16. Dude, looks in the mirror -- a fuckin' dragon I'm still chuckling....
    1
  17. And example of stupidity: >The left has always refused fact unless it advances political agendas that benefit them. Uhh...that goes for every group in existence. You think there are some altruistic supermen out there fighting for multiple political agendas? don't political agendas tend to conflict with one another? >Idiotic reply. Of course political agendas conflict with one another. Got stupid? That is precisely what makes them POLITICAL AGENDAS. The topic being expressed is that the left almost always refuses irrefutable fact and instead preferring anecdotal evidence to advance their rigid ideology. The right often falls into the exact same refusal of reliable evidence when the outcome effects their donors and big business. Been following politics for 45 years. Nothing amazes me anymore than the stupidity of people like you. Uh, my stupidity? Yeah, and you didn't say any of that at first, did you? No, at first you left a comment that suggested that those who "always refused fact unless it advances political agendas that benefit them" are "the left"... and not as you suggest only with my prodding, both sides. Now you suggest both sides, correct, nitwit? How do you know I wasn't ascertaining the same exact thing you just described, and instead of leaving a pithy non-entity of a comment no one is gonna read, I'd rather bring out the actual notions you wish to espouse, in full view, by questioning and deconstructing your clearly lacking pith; because you failed to mention how it's not just "the left" that does the exact thing you describe, but the exact thing you describe is INTRINSICALLY [as per your choice of words] applicable TO ALL political sides. Hence why I had to ask you to clarify, because otherwise, your comment would not only be specious, but also lackadaisical and stupid as fuck. So stfu up, gormtard. What I was saying was, there is no group that vies for anything BUT their agenda; so to imagine people delineating any other kind of action or choice is retarded. Which is why your comment was lacking in your attempt at brevity.
    1