Comments by "CynicalBroadcast" (@CynicalBastard) on "Nancy Pelosi Admits Defeat: Impeachment to be Sent to Die in the Senate" video.

  1. You contend that female voters and low testosterone male voters are sensible? You contend that worn out, and worn down, older males with lacking testosterone are? LOL. You people...you never fail to amuse.
    2
  2. Because he had consensual sex and his testimony was conflated with reports of sexual harassment, which Monika Lewinsky confirmed, so he was impeached. Trump can also be impeached: depends if it can be found that he obstructed congress in any way, or if there was any gross miscarriage of power.
    1
  3. It was the fact that he was dishonest to the American people about it and purjured himself that got him into trouble I already affirmed that, dork. The fact is, you keep insisting that that was still a good way to catch him lying...you wasn't tried. He was impeached but not charged with any crime, was he? nope...the answer is a swift "nope". So stop trying this game [all of you] of continuously reiterating your same exact tired platitudes about how "I am missing this perfect fact about the American spirit of the law" which you have not really evinced, considering that he wasn't charged with any seditious crime. He literally was just told to not be unbecoming, and once more, that his lies was noteworthy, that's not the point: the point is that whether he perjured himself or not, he only did so being confronted with "sex allegations". Imagine that...*sex allegations*...and look at the Me Too Movement now...what, you for that too? facepalm Had Bill told the truth from the get-go, there may still have been some people angry at him, but there never would've been an impeachment trial of any sort. And in all actuality there is far more corruption and shit attached to Bill and Hillary's name than just Bill's extramarital affairs. From Vince Foster all the way to Benghazi, there is so much scandal surrounding the Clintons that they really do perfectly exemplify the stereotype of the corrupt American politician always lusting for more and more power Ok, and? there is scandal in all of American history...name one president that didn't have scandal. I'll be waiting with your extraordinary exposition on the vague presidents where this general notion doesn't hold up: let me re-phrase: give me the piddling handful of presidents that didn't have major scandal, then explain how it's of import to this discussion: you enlighten me with your acumen.
    1
  4. No, you pay attention. You can tell me all you want [or he can tell me all he wants] about his legal argument, and how "it doesn't matter how one perjures himself", cause that is BESIDES THE POINT. I am not arguing that it matters: of course, legally, it doesn't matter, but you're butthurt about his perjury [thru your prying into his private life, thru Me Too allegations (or what amounts to that, at that time), making you a hypocrite, because certainly you are anti "believe the victim, believe the woman" mentality (or no? tell me I'm wrong about that)...]. Ok, I get that, that you're butthurt that he committed perjury. But the point stands: he was only impeached and not charged with any criminal penalty to his person, and didn't even step down as president, because there was nothing really that was a cause for the courts to proceed to jail him, as his perjury wasn't systematic, in a sense it was trifling. You only make it so big a concern because in retroactive condition you wish to belie more of the point of what we're seeing come to light now about inner-governmental operations: I understand that, you carbuncle of mass proportion: but I am still calling you out: a hypocrite: because with the perjury and then subsequent acquittal [he wasn't charged with a crime, but only impeached...why do presidents commit crimes, sometimes...ask yourself you silly silly person...just peruse your mind as to why they might do that...good God...], you can plainly see, his slight "crime" [being unwilling to admit to having an affair] was, quite literally, extramarital. You ONLY CARE BECAUSE HE IS A DEMOCRAT. Plain and simple. You are a party militant. Which makes you practically frothing over this: but here is the fact, the froth comes from the fact that he's a Democrat, he did things that if a Republican did you would either not care at this point [seeing as the dialogue nowadays is not about Jesus Jesus Jesus but about MAGA, which induces the sense of patriotic liberty, the American pride for justice THRU FREEDOM [the Freemason idea, of olde, because they became "progressive"], nor would you care if Trump is found guilty of perjury, and yet, nothing occurs and is acquitted [fingers crossed]. The fact is you just look like a hypocrite all the way, if you would endorse this view that Bill Clinton by way of his sordid affair was so criminal as to belay the notion of your hypercritical stance against "Demonrats" in the realm of pure hyperbole, irrational skepticism ["is water wet?"], and simple REFUSAL to take responsibility for the DENIGRATION of the Republican and Democratic ideals of an American Representative Democracy: and what's worse is what is to come if you all don't start realizing what is at stake, what is going to happen: it's worse than even the most prescient conceptions of war-faring: it is the overtaking of the rural by domination of the metropolis, the neoliberal attrition thru immigration, "safety", and capitalist mechanisms of international CEOs and shareholders of major banking firms and families [essays can be written on these factors, and how they culminate to the simple truth of Marx's predictions (but not his overall theory), which is attested to be Spengler [on the right] and Evola [independent political thought], and not just "the left" [which has evolved, no longer a clash between anarchists and "crude communists", but is now a "post-left", which can only be understood as a developing trend towards Mutualisms of different sorts, Localisms, ect. Sto-gap procedures for socialism and it's incursion: alot of which stems from the socialization of society itself, and it's paradigmatic tendencies towards orientation and direction from the State apparatus: we know these things now: but you people really have got to step up your retention and learn your conspirology [look it up] and history. Stop coming at me with this basic stuff.
    1
  5. Someone on YT with common sense! Bahahaha, no.
    1
  6. We need a civilian led oversight committee that would stop shit like this from being allowed to carry on. These are our tax dollars being wasted or given to other countries so that their kids can collect kickbacks and it just goes on Sounds like a really idiotic idea that only sounds good on paper. So when your opponents make the case that republican "oversights" need to be halted? What then, cochise? kick out the commies?
    1