Comments by "CynicalBroadcast" (@CynicalBastard) on "John Podesta's Nonsensical Spirit Cooking Crap" video.

  1. um...you are still not able to identify what is happening. the "occult act" here isn't even occult. so...again, you are not comprehending that the spin is bullshit. it's not occult. it's an art piece by a fucking performance artist.
    7
  2. he'd be quite the entertainer, i'm sure, too.
    3
  3. Gnosticism is merely intellect. no Jesus worship required. Jesus is nothing more, and should be nothing more, than the intellect and a personal revelatory God of one's individual self. the people of antiquity just couched this concept in mythological terms, because that's what helps people "believe". cause people are stupid.
    3
  4. i piss on Christ's face and shit on the cross and the bastard son.
    2
  5. spirit cooking! devil!!!!!!!!!!!!!! satanic!!!!!! killuminati, broo!!! occult! OCCULT BRO! OCCULT! PS: a Styx art lesson on anti-art movements. lol, wow. PPS: k, i luld...electricity fried, beat-off, midgets....do want. shakes
    2
  6. Maybe he sees Podesta and other occult elites as competition ahah we are all in competition with one another.
    2
  7. basically to summarise: Styx thinks Podesta is a child abusing fruit-cake who MAY think a bunch of grungy bodily fluids are gonna give him power, when Styx full-well knows that's all bullshit. you think that Podesta is a child abusing fruit-cake who thinks a bunch of grungy bodily fluids are gonna give him power, and he worships the Devil. big diff. only one is not an idiotic position, and the other is hilariously idiotic. tell me: why didn't the Clinton camp win, if they were doing all this worship for that purpose? what purpose? to lose? i guess their ritualism did work then, did it. or maybe their ritualism was shit...or maybe it wasn't a ritual to win or lose at all, but just a bunch of hogwash. or maybe it was solely for the Devil, and the Devil reneged on his promises...or maybe they did all this for the Devil, and he told them to take a dive...nah, that can't be it either...maybe they didn't actually do any ritualism at all.
    2
  8. yes. only that energy is neutral. there is no white or black magick. the intent is what directs the magick, and it's neither dark or light, it's what you want it to be.
    2
  9. hopefully Styx's channel will rise and the scourge of idiocy will fall.
    2
  10. occult synchro?
    2
  11. i think occultism is far more real, and serious, than the claim that Satan is real. also, Satanism has nothing to do with Satan. i think you're more referring to Luciferianism. which is a funny term...did you know Jesus Christ was termed "the light-barer"? interesting, no? seeing as that means Jesus was referred to as "Lucifer". =)
    2
  12. i painted the Devil, hence, i've opened a doorway to Satan...Satan, go get KatieLove. Simsallabim!
    2
  13. it doesn't achieve anything but horror-movie vibes -- attractive to idiots, mostly, as a form of "paganism". (laughable use of the term)
    2
  14. an intent that holds no potential for magick. in case you didn't notice...the performance mimics the act of ritualism...but isn't actually ritualism, even if she says it is...she's an artist...not an occultist.
    2
  15. performance art mimics what a ritual is...but i can make a ritual out of smelling my own farts, doesn't mean that i'm doing magick. she can take sperm and blood and poop and smear into a Picasso -- doesn't mean she's done good art, nor does it mean she's done a ritual to make a Picasso blood/jizz/poop man, or contributed in any way with that shit and piss and blood, to a magickal force. it's essentially a mockery of the form -- like Styx said, anti-art. it's anti-art. a mockery.
    2
  16. what are you gonna do about it though?
    1
  17. It's art". That is the biggest cop out I have ever heard. Art is a literal cover for something much deeper. art is satanic, watch out! facepalm soon we won't be able to make art that doesn't glorify Jesus Christ...oh fuck, but then that's idol worship! so not even that is allowed...ALLAH would be proud. vomit eating sperm and blood and piss isn't a pretty fucked up activity no one is eating it, as far as anyone knows, and Styx did say it was fucked up. throw some ears on. It's a rejection of human decency. It is rebellion against what we're "supposed" to be. it's edgy art-house chicanery. it's like the occultist who literally thinks he or she is talking to an anime character from the cosmos. it might be a manifestation of the cosmos, but it isn't really goddamn Naruto.
    1
  18. LOL
    1
  19. the pentagram, also a symbol of messianic lore.
    1
  20. Podesta is a slave- a lackey who doesn't even realize he's enslaved. just another minion like Hillary. Nergal needs to talk with them, and admonish them. bad minions! bad! "You could very well be right" he is.
    1
  21. LOL yeah, spirit cooked my pain and now i'm an occultist -- but wait, where's Satan?
    1
  22. LOL yeah, spirit cooked my pain and now i'm an occultist -- but wait, where's Satan? LOL, i crack myself up.
    1
  23. what IS it that one can do about that? should we forgo freedom for the sake of fear? what she does in private is her own business -- and in public, as has been stated, it's not occult, it's not the same- according to the artist's own words on the subject. but i'd love to know, even if her private occultism was something to be concerned about...what can be done about it in a free country?
    1
  24. it's the terms you're using, that i think he might have a problem with. Satanism has a rule, it says that those whom hurt a child should be held in the greatest contempt. so this is, see, your complete misunderstanding of the term "Satanism". did you know Jesus was referred to as "the lightbarer". why is that? it directly translates to Lucifer. ponder that, while you think about how little you understand about these terms. PS: what makes you think it wasn't art masquerading as the occult, and nothing more? what makes your beliefs more likely than the idea that that artist could be conflating the two (art and occult) for bullshit publicity...or maybe that she thinks "that's art". you don't know for certain, those things, as well.
    1
  25. yeah, he needs to step up his Round Saturn's Eye game, and get to the heart of the matter...all the stuff people don't know about, it's REAL! gasp
    1
  26. uses imagination to provide the backdrop for his hating imagination
    1
  27. have you been to her private parties? what effect did i have on you? have you NOT so been to her private parties? what effect did the "spirit cooking" have on you?
    1
  28. not an intellectual quest for truth and rebellion against religious dogma, but a rebellion against morality itself. which is why it's not real occultism...hopefully you can be one of the sum few whom can apprehend this concept. i made some funny troll music videos, to troll around some...these, for example, are just attempts at trolling, and even though there are occult elements being hinted at, it's not real occultism, seeing as though the motivations are to troll and not to effect reality. if the intent was effect reality, alot more than a couple hours worth of fun would be necessary to commit to. and to note: to effect reality, i'd have to change myself in the process, regardless if i am using/changing anyone else in the middle of it. no change in ones self, no real occultism.
    1
  29. no, that isn't what Satanism is...that's what arises from the Christian doctrine, and it's what the elites (EL-ites) want is more money and power, and that's it. no occultism necessary.
    1
  30. yes, yes, it's all semantics. you're right, semantics is how we define the meaning of what is denoted in reality, the reality, that is, that can be agreed upon, and accounted for -- the antithesis and thesis -- this and that -- GENDER -- yes, let's get into that arbitrary subject for the sake of not having an position to back up your point of view that isn't based on semantics.
    1
  31. it's about self-freedom and liberation.
    1
  32. how stupid of you.
    1
  33. it's simply a redemption of weakness from strength, of man from the machine.
    1
  34. and the meaning of the spirit cooking is, oaxaca?
    1
  35. wine = symbolised blood don't lie now.
    1
  36. symbolised, literal, whatver...i'm saying it's blood. it's called the body and blood of Christ. whoever is arguing it's not blood...is an idiot.
    1
  37. are you guys talking about the fucking blood of Christ and body of Christ...? dude...it's in the name. BLOOD...BODY...if you can't fathom this concept that it symbolises blood and the body of christ...then you can't be helped. you might as well pull the plug.
    1
  38. theologians say = it's really Christ because Christ is supersubstantial! ok...so right now, i'm sitting on Christ's face, or maybe his cock, that dirty bird.. he's supersubstantial, remember? he's everywhere!
    1
  39. alright...so the body of Christ it is then.
    1
  40. that's correct. it's psychological magick, if anything, which has no basis in the occult, in terms of actual occult ritualism. it's a mock-up, in a sense. all rituals are mock-ups of occultism, from the folk, to the pious, to the normative way people go about their day to day lives.
    1
  41. LOL
    1
  42. Pluto is just playing the field. Kek needs to have a talk with Nergal, get him to lay flat the crops of Hillary Clinton.
    1
  43. this is just hilarious to me. soon you'll be on CNN like "no, that isn't occultism". LOL convincing people, Styx, will soon be considered Satanic. LOL someone call Throbbing Gristle.
    1
  44. the morons will eat this shit up...occult synchronicity for the...lose?
    1
  45. that sort of reflects humanities tendencies these days, though, doesn't it? LOL
    1
  46. as people, they are more interesting, than as artists. they are manipulating reality, but not through magick - though with "art". and art is always malleable. though, none of this means they are able to concoct anything but their own whims into reality. are the elite gonna serve themselves by partaking in "ritualism" with Abramovic...no, they aren't, they are going to shoot themselves in the foot with that kind of thing, so why should they even bother. i still think this is all hyperbolic scare-mongering about a silly "art" project -- all of which has worked AGAINST their favor (the elites), so what the fuck would be the point of it all, for them? can you answer me that, Adapt?
    1
  47. paint with your bodily fluids = profit??? wow, i had no idea...thanks Grandma.
    1
  48. everyone has a choice. this does not take away from what Styx said. he was right. it's not occultism, it's just her art project to "free herself", which is why it's under the guise of occultism. it's a dog and pony show.
    1
  49. um, shouldn't he be doing that? why shouldn't he look out for someone with the same interests as him, commie?
    1
  50. all of the hub-bub is bullshit though. yes, she could be pulling a Spare, using art as the medium for magick, but her attempts seem vague at best...just take a ritual someone made, and perform it shoddily, and call it art? that's not all that's involved in making the ritual, though. =\ but i do agree, if i can shed some light on Hillary Clinton, i guess it's not all bad...though this hoopla about artists being satanic and thus "must be stopped" is just as bad as any other forgoing of freedom you see these days. just like the people who state "those Marxist teachers must be stopped!" hello, A: freedom of expression and B: people have to pay to take the class! it's not like people are being forced to take it...but people ACT like that that's the case. it's absurd and sickening, to say the least. if that's what it takes in this election...then seriously, fuck this election. and if all it takes is a Katie Perry video with a symbol in it to cause mass fear and panic, and create a less free world in the process, as people witch hunt for "possible occultism" (possible hidden stuff, it's laughable to the extreme), then this race is more and more looking dire.
    1
  51. it's mimicking ritualism, under the guise as a performance art piece...what is difficult to understand? i can paint a mirror, doesn't mean i can see my reflection therein.
    1
  52. all art is the devil! dark-sided!!
    1
  53. indeed. and PS: chronecro, psychotropics effect perception, and some can alter it in a way that allows certain thoughts to be conceived of easier than without said alteration...it's a matter of making art of the mind. that's all it is. through that you can understand occultism, mayhaps. but yes, Anon, i'd say, you are correct. dark energy, that's the hypothesis i've come to, as well. it's like Vapourwave...small pieces out of chaos being brought from the void into a cohesive plane of existence...to put a very hipster spin on the matter. LOL
    1
  54. that counts for ruining whatever chances Hillary had in connecting with a Christian audience...so that backfired!
    1
  55. what if the artist was making an occult ritual performance art, as a way to make art out of an occult ritual, and not the other way around? ever think of that? so, if that was truly the case, then what? is making art evil?
    1
  56. flatulence
    1
  57. and the meaning behind the spirit cooking is? what?
    1
  58. Crowley was a bit of a performer.
    1
  59. like a trickster saint.
    1
  60. yes, he must have been! afterall, occultism = j00ish satanic magic (somehow)
    1
  61. because the aether isn't above, it's below.
    1
  62. those who reflect light and those whom absorb light are both one and the same. it's the interpretation of what one is, that's distinct. what one is is light in a vacuum. a mask. some people put their hands together to pray. some contemplate reality without such remarks.
    1
  63. "it" is not anything that you ascribe to "it". "it" is without form. put your finger on "it" and it's gone.
    1
  64. the delusion is thinking you can divulge it's secrets with any language.
    1
  65. language is a construct of human communication. one need not communicate within that construct, lest with the symbols of the innate, when dealing with the occult.
    1
  66. it's not. a no true scotsman argument is like this -- "i'm an occultist, i ate a baby!"; "no true occultist would eat a baby! hence you're not a an occultist!" -- this is not what Styx said. he never said "no true" anything to any one argument being made, so it is therefore not a No True Scotmas fallacy, or argument...hell, there wasn't even an argument, in case you couldn't tell, you need an argument to create a fallacious argument such as "no true scotsman".
    1
  67. you haven't even grasped that it's an art performance.
    1
  68. you realise that that means nothing, right? so she says in private dwellings it's different. but how is it different? what does she do different, that makes it not art anymore but occult? add more jizz? (let's face it, you don't know what the fuck you're talking about)
    1
  69. LOL watch out the artists are the next minions of Nergal! next are book-binders, because what should they have to do with such devilish things? then free-thinkers are next. all evil Satanic stuff.
    1
  70. and there are strong magicks and weak. me communicating right now is a form of magick...doesn't mean it's effective. not necessarily. i hope it is, however.
    1
  71. why shouldn't he be upset (if that's the case at all) that people are prevaricating, and convincing morons whom don't have a clue about the occult, or art for that matter, to conflate the two as Satanic ritualism? i think as a writer, and an occultist, this is tampering with two assets he has at his disposal, all for the sake of media hype and for the hope to bash Clinton and give Trump fans some "satanic fodder" based on nonsense misapprehension of the concept (the occult) that Styx admires and practices. why shouldn't he admonish, when the hype is hyperbolic bullshit based on the lies of the cult of Jesus?
    1
  72. LOL wow. you are really dumb.
    1