Comments by "CynicalBroadcast" (@CynicalBastard) on "Even the New York Times is Afraid of Trumps Internet Bulwark" video.

  1. Intergenerational gaps is in the long-game for Fabian Socialists Oh and, presidents don't define everything, Styx. Trump has been doing well...so? He isn't "all of America". The nation of America will never take a stance other than the same it always has [seemingly, but I could be wrong]. So hence, it's not Trump that should be worried about...it's any single president, one to the next, that should always be worried about, if the standard in America is "well, he won't start WW3" -- great...so he's even more covert? doesn't bode well for anyone who "lives in the real world", lest they will admit that it's moving in directions that they can't control, and at least just be honest with themselves about the "power structure" of the economy, and stop complaining about how they don't see enough of it in their wallet...you all can't stand the idea of a fair distribution of economic wealth, so again...you should just admit you have no control, over anything, let alone yourselves.
    1
  2. Working for society for a bunch of selfish retards is society in a nutshell...so this isn't an endorsement for socialism...but if everyone just only worried about little old them, the world would not be better of. It already isn't "better off" because of people like that.
    1
  3. Muh free stuff Capitalists cronies basically get money thrown at them. But that free shit is not "free" is it? Sort of like how Sanders "free shit" isn't actually an option [and isn't supposed as one, at all] because no one claims "free shit": they claim a change in the system, bottom-up, and top-down, absolutely, which scares people [and probably should, society and markets are volatile]. Socialism never entails "free shit" because it always entails "more work". Nothing is free. But this lie continues because...Styx...you're a maroon. =)
    1