Comments by "CynicalBroadcast" (@CynicalBastard) on "Several Terrorist Attacks in London: Sadiq Khan Smiling Gleefully" video.

  1. What about the white-ethnic British Muslims in England? =)
    2
  2. Give those on the Right a city and they'll maintain it properly forever. Give those on the Left a city and they'll Fuck it up and blame everyone but themselves. LOL. Ya, serfdom was always so nice in pre-modern England.
    1
  3. Wow...you're just plain ignorant; the names change, the ideas remain the same. The names change? That's awfully convenient. So at one point conservatism was what? Not conservatism but what? Liberalism? or no, was it Traditionalism? Well, you tell me what conservatism was 'back then'. Good luck with that. But no, what seems to ACTUALLY be the case (you know, in reality, not your idealism), is that the IDEAS change, while the NAMES stay the same, quite the opposite of your imaginings. The modern Progressivist philosophy has far more in common with serfdom than Conservativism. That's sort of besides the point, isn't it? But regardless, modern "progressivism" doesn't have anything to do with serfdom, even if, as a consequence, it attracts morons whom'd give in to it's promulgation. Same goes with modern Conservatism- just see the last video on this channel, where there was every moron calling for the death of all gays because they've been told it's degeneracy. But again, doesn't change the fact that pre-modern nations (ie, nations therefore which conserved their ideals of themselves) had serfdom, openly. Hell, just look at Table Mountain, you ingrate. He never stated what you described. Perhaps you should work on your reading comprehension dipshit. Sure he did, he just didn't realize it...and I damn well won't shut up, because just look at the idiocy it attracts, this kind of blatant craptacular bullshit you want to swill because it somehow vindicates you, or validates you. Nah, I love exposing that shit for what it truly is, it's a dog wearing a cape.
    1
  4. 1: Bold is quotation, so as to be clear in whom i'm addressing. 2: This name has been handed down for generations, and it's now been handed down to this pre-2008 Youtube account. Long before there was a large Le Skeptic community. 3: There isn't a pretense in capitalizing a deity (History), nor nouns to differ them from their verb counterpart. Conservatism=/=conservatism/to conservate. 4: Yes, whom'd. I don't think Conservatism is evil, nor conserving. I do think proponents of Conservatism can be, and alot are, mostly retarded, though.
    1
  5. Them too. Boot'em out. How?
    1
  6. Boat. Plane. Bus. Take your pick. Nice non-answer. So really, how are you going to profile these white-ethnic English Muslims, and also, how will you define their legal status, given that they are national citizens? I'm sure you haven't the answers to these questions, but I try.
    1