Comments by "CynicalBroadcast" (@CynicalBastard) on "Gilets Bleus as French Police Stage Pickets" video.

  1. You'd be deluded to think it was so simple. Who owns what? is it the left? what is the left? can it be said that it is one thing or another, along the wake of History? I'll tell you who owns what...there are no anarchists who owns the institutions. Communists? yeah, maybe in China, or certain Luxemborgian EU influences, Eurocommunists -- do they run the institutions, yes, but only along with those houses which are, for all intents and purposes, "conservative". You need to do a bigger reading of History to even bother contemplating it, reading some book someone told you was propaganda, is serving a confirmation bias- I can't say you are totally wrong, but just vehemently lacking the aptitude to understand the concepts regarding the trends in academia, and Historical trends regarding philosophy and the worldview as existential versus one as a co-option to the governments, already- viz a viz the church, the banks, and the Hohenstaufen. What about the Kraftkorps or Freikorps? or the Okrana? how about the aristocracies fall into the Soviet Empire, in Russia? direct ties to France finance. Alot of the so called "right-wing" have had direct ties to communism? why?
    1
  2. brilliant navel gazing Cue comedic foghorn. -- You're being a bit ironic. You come at an informed post, with that? LOL And see, Germanikolaas Absolute, above me, can see the greater picture at hand. Why can't you?
    1
  3. Not saying anything new there, dude. Everyone knows leftism is pushed in schools and in the news. You're still not even addressing what I said. Which is funny, because you all seem to know so much. And Communists and Capitalists are funded by? who? can you answer this, or no?
    1
  4. Example: Adorno - instead of attempting to foster respect for black music, instead disdained it- Critical Theory has a hate-boner for capitalism, sure- indeed- but to conflate them with "Cultural Marxists" is still wrong- they have Marxist views established, but they a: disdain postmodernism [ which mars the whole thesis of the OP] and b: as Marxists they do not consider cultural a "good thing" hence Cultural Marxism isn't espoused by them- they consider it, like most things, an 'excess spillover of capitalism' [would be a brief and pithy exposition of their views]. Cultural Marxism is espoused more by Eurocommunists, which obviously still hold Marxist views. Alot of right-wingers hold Marxist views- only ones that are not totally ensconced on an Objectivist point of view- see National Bolshevism and other brands of Nationalist-Anarchic, et al, movements whom may not ascribe to the total notion of a marxist/communist mode of production or governance, per se, but nevertheless prescribe an accelerationist methodology. And those who aren't prone to accelerate one way (Marxism) are certainly apt to the other way (Dues Vult, Reactionaries, ect) -- any sitting on any fences simply resolves into a socialist/fascist type dictatorship (so it seems-- whether a Third Position or no), and resolves to emancipate land and resources from nations around them, or, they are considered Social Democrats and Centrists. LOL, sorry but some really undefinable [within the context OP provided] subtext about "right-wing bad" is not found in that book. The book is clear some exposition (reactionary as well, after Hitler) to define why Ethnocentrism occurs, in EUROPE, of all place, the most densely packed fuckfest of a study in chaos theory, since, O, just the Dawn of Man. LOL -- you people are, sometimes, too much.
    1