Comments by "CynicalBroadcast" (@CynicalBastard) on "US Stock Market Hits a New Record High: Trumponomics!" video.

  1. As long as there is cumulative growth—and it isn't all frittered away under useless socialist economic policies—the world will continue to thrive. That is, until new problems arise, which there shall be. Keeping the market "free" from corporate-politico influence is a start—a good start—next would be cementing a national basis to dismantle the politico-military-industrial complex, which is engaged worldwide, by all strategic factions. That probably is not going to happen. Probability, slim to none.
    4
  2. Accelerate.
    4
  3. The beginnings of "accelerationism" starts with Marx, predominantly. This, also, here, is an insuperable fact: Marx did not speak of an economic plan- no- he spoke of an inherent worry of "man being made meaningless" and his thought is outmoded and as such, hard to even read- neomarxists are not even reading him right, I can tell this without a whit of uncertainty. All Marx set in motion [as not everyone that proceeds from there can even be equated with Marx in any fashion, maybe save their mental fervor brought on by the fin de siècle era European economy] was the thought that many a right-wing[er] has come across himself, many a "reactionary" [which the Bolsheviks were, "a revolutionary reactionary socius", arising after the fall of the Russian empire—the actual beginnings of the Russian Revolution period is demarcated to a point before said Leninist theory]. This "crisis" mentality is contained in most reactionary thought, just see Spengler's Decline Of The West, or Julius Evola. These are not just "left-wing ideas", they are shared ideas, Styx—it'd be best to deal with their outgrowths wisely, especially in this crucial interim between now and the next election, when people are fired up. Trump is a form of accelerationism, Styx...just not a leftist sort—which stems from the notion that the absolute highest-ups are shit-bags. And the theory begins there. You don't even have to agree with the ends of his critique nor even agree with anything in-between [which even any libertarian worth his salt will acknowledge exists—take "individualism" in the sense of what is "sensed as value", ie., an object independent of a price that is fixed to it from an outside subject to oneself, given a value as to what you think it's actually worth, that is, what a person "demands" of the "supply"]—really it's the beginning that gets me. So what? The machine flows continue.
    2
  4. They call it "game theory" for a reason. Economics is like a game.
    2
  5. The debt is problematic and why it is as such, well, is because of the outgrowth of tech-industries and growing civic centers [via immigration, etc.], and the metropolises in their neoliberal excrescence contain those who will fend for the growth there, in those areas—whence the rural is consistently drained of labor and the debt is impinged on their "necessity" to keep pace with the rest of the actual living/social space needed to be met with resources thus which the economy depends on.
    2
  6. I do agree altogether, Styx. Just sayin'. You did say he would be a mild reformer, too.
    1
  7. Here's the thing Styx. The US should care just about it's own citizenry. It doesn't. Is that hard to understand? you're acting like the rest of the world are the only globalists, here. Operation Paperclip, you ever hear of that? of course you have. [Or, no, sorry, were - cause Trump is gonna hopefully start a trend that'll maybe continue. But don't act like the US is innocent...how could it be? it is not exculpated.]
    1
  8. Trump should keep this up. Cleaning up ISIS was well met, too. Capital is proving itself worthy with Trump.
    1