Comments by "CynicalBroadcast" (@CynicalBastard) on "Project Veritas Reveals ABC News Bias, David Wright Gets Suspended" video.
-
3
-
Kingy B You are a communist. "Crony capitalist"? Bernie? He's advocating socialism, dimwit. Because the actual crony capitalists are people like...the Kochs..."libertarian"...the people like the Fabian Society, and their ilk [Labor Party], who are eking into socialism-lite, as it is, and has it's always been, even since the early-industrial era [cf. Ricardo]...they are openly socialist-capitalist [can you imagine? see? you can't even fathom what you don't know, but hey, now you know...]. These are "crony capitalists", them, and the banker families and many other "black families" [ironical term, no?]. You know nothing. Sanders might be a shill...you certainly aren't proving it, though.
3
-
@RebeccaCampbell1969 This is not “a democracy”, it’s a representative republic... who represents you, choosing the person...
A representative republic is a representative democracy. Now, you people can "say" it's not...that really doesn't matter...the point is, it's an indirect democracy. You vote for representatives...you, the DEMOS, vote for representation in this republic. Where do you think the republican ideal comes from? it comes out of the ceding of Roman authorial powers to the senate, whom are, in a democratic fashion, voted for by some class...and in America, that "class" is "everyone", "the people". Everyone gets to vote, and then you have what pertains to the electoral college, etc. But alas, the voting is entailed within democracies, there are no other system over politics or governance that ALLOWS voting of the DEMOS [the people, demographics], period. Any kind of VOTING from "the people" is a democracy, but in the US, because of the electoral college, and because of how voting works, otherwise, it is an indirect vote, but nonetheless still a democratic vote, and pertains to a democratic system.
If every American did it’s job, but then again that’s a fantasy
What job? freedom? liberty? what job? owning a business? if every one owned their own business, no competition would be available...then you have your socialism, already. Ahh...don't you love it?
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@EgoBrain1 Yeah, but the reasoning is also obvious that there is still mis-information in all right-wing media, typically [Styx even affirms this, Breitbart, Fox, all of them are considered as null and void according to Styx, remember that]. Plus, then Styx is also wrong about alot of things [people know that, right? right. But he never hardly will interact with those people because that makes his job difficult, which is understandably annoying, to be sure, but that's a given...a right opinion and judgement and critique would be into...why? or just making money? stabilizing the State? with erm occult books...no...the knowledge from said books will help stabilize his wallet and his words, his fine speech and wit, that caterwauling of his, it'll definitely do something to help the planet he so desperately cares about, whilst he panders his delusions about communists under the school-ground snatching up kids and posing Satanists, because well...oh well...surely, this is more helpful than...my silly insipid writing. Haha.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@MAGABeard I am academically informed because I read subjective opinions to parse them with what I see as objective [witnessed and held] fact. I am not even academically informed, per se, I am anti-academically informed. My main man is Julius Evola, so with everything you said, you aren't but preaching to the choir. Socialism is the shadow behind all movements of self-management, whether "racial" [National Socialism], contingent on capital [cf. Chile, and the libertarian think-tanks and financiers of the juntas which led to the an-cap Chile, and which turn into socialism, afterwards], whether it's contingent on other factors [supranational EU, whatever other cultural and economic factors], etc.
1
-
1
-
1
-
Kingy B Yeah, and? He's was poor [and this goes against him by way of conservatives ocking him for it, as well, calling him "lazy" and calling him "good for nothing" - "didn't accomplish much", etc., forgetting that it's nearly impossible to play ball, that is, unless you deviate into "crypto-nationalism" [I suppose you could say; some terms can be rather extenuating to use in such interchangeable terms, but what I mean is that it's not quite "fascism" (actually, the left in ANTIFA circles, in America most peculiarly, are as fascist-seeming as the more fascist Fascists' in Greece, whom actually fight Grecian ANTIFA literally annually. Not to mention Italy, too; it's strong there...but point is, I'm sorry to digress,- it's called "linker-Fachismus" in some "academic circles, which is quite prescient...everyone said themselves, "they are the fascists, not the alt-right!"- well, partly true, look it up, "linker-Fachismus", or "leftist-fascism". Because fascism is a really funny thing you have to study a bit to know what it actually entails...more than "ultra-nationalism" which is sorta the watchword of the left when it comes to "fascism" as they typically understand it; they obviously would not agree with Habermas; but it's part and parcel to the same regime- they are just a different milieu, coming at the reformist activism of this kind of regime from a "leftist" position, that is to say, in this case a "inside" and "without" position, viz. the notion of "super-rich people" and there's your point about Sanders, by the by, that though, and also the notion of quasi-anarchistic forms of "social democracy" revolution, or in other words "Communism". But you see, if they don't think they are "fascist"- which they are being because they are trying to force reformism by way of "symbols" and "speech", even to the point of "so-called" "microfascism" ["you can't walk this street, with that red hat, you don't belong"], and you can see from this the reverse of the right-wing "type" of fascism that occurs when "inside" and "within" the "national-body" [the race "typically"- but also the "civic body", in Russian this is called the 'Narod', the "people", whom the Narodniks before Soviet Communism won the day in Russia, were also known as 'the Populists'], which supposes not only to keep aristocratic ties [but NOT in the Narodniks of Russia, because they acted more like what turned into the National Bolsheviks out of the revolution]- the "first" third position fascism indicates a wont to back away from these ties but retain the traditions of them- and note that Mussolini was a socialist, card-carrying, before he was a fascist, card-carrying. Whereas, say, National Socialism tends toward a "biological-race" model, informed by eugenics in the then progressive era, so-called...Fascism tends towards the "civic-body" of the "nation-race" or the "citizens" [from the root 'citoyen'], and discards the empirical model [at the time] of eugenics and opts for "Rome", essentially, as their model. It's almost similar to the USA's inception but their revolt was much different and their constitution [the best!] much different, inspired directly by many characters, many many, but typically, and that is to say, down-the-line-between two sides, (not referring to the civil war, no) and that is the federalists and the anti-federalists, in fear of the arising of a new monarchy approaching from the federal-government's insinuation against any defense opposing the sort of divide that would cause the issue. All very legal bafflegab for most people, considering it was the aver that the constitution was not totally sound and conterminus with their (like the Narodniks!) 'anti-aristocratic beliefs', which they "feared" would arise again, as I mentioned. Racial matters aside from these 'constitutionalists', but more like radical Christian Americans...this is the crux of the issue at hand now, though I'm not worried, it's not really "kicked off" yet. With the Libertarians [Hayek] and his think-thanks financing the juntas in Chile, the eventual coup of the "nation-race" was inevitable, proving not only various matters, but even still yet, showing the "evolution" of this thought-process, which was warned of by Engels, but surely. But as you can see, the shadow of Race and of Socialism looms in the shadow of tender-floating finance Capitalism and the casino mentality of the case of the American minimalist-mind, and mooching off "black families" no less, well, they are mooching off you, but you won't see that national debt go down, trust me...not with all this on your plate.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1