Comments by "CynicalBroadcast" (@CynicalBastard) on "Amy Klobuchar Berates Trump for not Prejudicing a Jury by Condemning Kyle Rittenhouse" video.

They dryness of this title is suspect. She berates Trump, and? So? Is Trump a moron? This is a good test: Klobuchar, may not be doing much of anything, but it'd sure be fun to see if Trump actually did weigh in on the Kyle Rittenhouse thing. Yeah. And so what? if he did, he'd be a moron. But what did Klobuchar do? simply berating Trump doesn't do anything but egg him on...and you...you fools get egged on, cause you think you're defending some kind of hero...AHAGAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA clutches chest
2
@manny022 If it it's not an item in evidence, oh well. If it can be, it probably would be, and should be. But nevertheless, look at you whinging morons, LOL!
2
@The_Mighty_Fiction What?
1
@dragonkin1876 No, he's not. And no, I'm not. Any lawyer can tell you what I've told you.
1
@dragonkin1876 I commented back, but you aren't really responding.
1
They dryness of this title is suspect. She berates Trump, and? So? Is Trump a moron? This is a good test: Klobuchar, may not be doing much of anything, but it'd sure be fun to see if Trump actually did weigh in on the Kyle Rittenhouse thing. Yeah. And so what? if he did, he'd be a moron. But what did Klobuchar do? simply berating Trump doesn't do anything but egg him on...and you...you fools get egged on, cause you think you're defending some kind of hero...AHAGAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA clutches chest
1
Except that he did. Poor little right-wingers need to bend their own alleged rules of recognition [1st amendment rights] and lick the boots of the corporatist class you all endeavor to secure and control. LOL!
1
@ootmaster1 You are insinuating that these American citizens should be attacked like nasis attacked communists in Germany back in the fin de siècle. What the fuck are YOU talking about?
1
@ootmaster1 No. You oversimplify because you are vague and dumb. Communists were, like anarchists, and socialists [Blanquists, especially, when it comes to insurrection] were fighting the powers that be [capitalism], and Hitler [who was also fighting erm the "Jew" AKA capitalism] just fought the communists on ideological grounds: against democratic socialism, and for "national socialism", that is, the self-hood of the race as the weltanschauung, and biology as the transcendental category [as opposed to fascism which had it's own racial theories, and opposed the communists on similar grounds].
1
@ootmaster1 The Bolsheviks wanted to save their land for their own people, too, you moron, that's why they, the majority, were against the Mensheviks or "minority", because they are an offshoot of the Narodnicks [the Populists], they share a lineage of socialist nationalism. The only reason they split on ideological grounds is because the minority was gradualists, and the majority were not.
1
@ootmaster1 And by the by, you're such an idiot, you missed the point. Communists = democratic socialism National Socialists = racial weltanschauung.
1
@ootmaster1 I'm defending Americans.
1
@ootmaster1 Yeah, they saw it as being oppressive, and their serfdom was unwarranted, especially under the harsh regime, so they wanted to modernise, when their crown wouldn't: they took control, sort of like the Americans did in the colonies of the British. They also were irredentists [like the nasis], which was par the course of the era [resources, land, growing populace and labor force, etc.]. Shut up, you're a know-nothing.
1
@ootmaster1 Yeah, you're a non-entity to me.
1
@ootmaster1 Who said anyone was 'good'?
1
@NwoDispatcher Nonsense.
1
@NwoDispatcher What the fuck are you talking about?
1
@NwoDispatcher Nonsense. Capitalism has begged for more centralisation, [Brussels, and in America, the IMF] and has dissolved culture by outsourcing all homelands to the work of building city-hubs of commerce.
1