Comments by "CynicalBroadcast" (@CynicalBastard) on "San Francisco Considers "Caren Act" to Prosecute White People Who Call Cops" video.

  1. Karen doesn't ascribe to political issues. It describes a person [usually female] who is having a public breakdown over very small "alleged infractions" to their person. You people don't even know what the fuck you are talking about, anymore, you're so wrapped up in propaganda [and making it, yourself].
    1
  2.  @mkeolver  Yes, but as usage evolves so does arbitrariness. Eventually words stop meaning anything if they are overused in ways that do not provide consensus but only steamrolls over usage. Like I can say you are one thing or another, but if I use the term I apply to you overmuch, then it starts losing it's relevance, and just the same, if I use the term in ways that don't ascribe to what it currently means [or meant in the past] then this "evolves" the term but that doesn't necessarily automatically imply it's consensus. It needs to be used to gain consensus, and it needs to be used non-arbitrarily, or lest the term "devolves" into gibberish. Like calling fascists "left-wing" or calling right-wingers "nasis" for simply being conservative.
    1
  3. PS: Terminology evolves according to usage - not consensus. First comes usage, then comes consensus.
    1