Comments by "John Burns" (@johnburns4017) on "The Armchair Historian" channel.

  1. 2
  2. 2
  3. 2
  4. 2
  5. 2
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. 2
  20. 2
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23. 2
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. @Hardly Working Britain kept 115,000 back in the UK. The idea was to let the Yanks do some fighting for once. It took them 13 months to fight the Germans with boots on the ground. Americans were Johnny-come-late in WW2. Apart from the US Philippino forces that surrendered in early 1942, the US had a couple of divisions in Gaudalcanal after August 1942, one in New Guinea by November 1942. In 1943 the US managed to get up to six divisions in the Pacific, but still not matching the British or British Indian armies respectively. Until late 1943 the Australian Army alone deployed more ground fighting troops against the Japanese than the USA. The Americans never put more ground troops into combat against the Japanese at any point than just the British Indian Army alone, which was 2.6 million strong. The US had nowhere near 2.6 million men on the ground against the Japanese. The Soviets fielded over one million against the Japanese. Most Japanese troops were put out of action by the British and Soviets, not the USA - FACT. At the battles of Khohima and Imphal the Japanese suffered their worst defeat in their history up to that point. Then the British set the Eastern and Pacific fleets against the Japanese, not far off in numbers than the US fleet. The British Pacific Fleet assisted US troops protecting the western coast of Okinawa with its armoured carriers - they could operate way nearer to the coast than wooden decked US carriers. The Australian navy assisted the US navy all through the Japanese war. It was less than 10 months before the Japanese surrender before the US actually fielded an entire army against the Japanese. That was in the Philippines. Before that it was just divisions fighting on scattered islands for a month or so at a time. The British Commonwealth fielded over 100 divisions in 1942 alone, compared to the US total of 88 by the end of the war.
    1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46.  @americanatlas3631  The US never had a top class general, many buffoons though - Patton, Bradley, Clark and MacArthur come to mind. Most were only colonels a few years previously, including Eisenhower. Montgomery had more years experience as a general than all of them combined in the ETO - literally. ♦ Only the Americans criticise Monty, in a veiled attempt to disguise their inept performance in Europe. Monty never retreated, not once. ♦ From mid-1942 onwards the British Army was the finest in the world, taking all in its path. ♦ Bradley felt humiliated having 2 of his 3 armies taken from him and given to Monty in the Bulge. ♦ The deplete and demoralised US armies should have been pushed to the rear of the British 21st Army Group. Monty never humiliated them. He kept them at the front. ♦ Monty filled the losses of the two US armies with British troops. British troops under US command with the US command under British command. It worked. ♦ The Americans always criticise Monty for not being aggressive. Which is a way of saying he was not stupid and overran his supply lines as Rommel always did along with some British generals in North Africa and as did US general Patton. ♦ A US report in the 1980s criticised Patton heavily in the Lorraine. When the US 1st and 9th armies were given to Monty at the Bulge, Monty chose the right option. Instead of joining a grindmeat where the Americans lost almost 100,000 and the Germans around 75,000, Monty decided to choose his own ground, and not fight in the Ardennes. The result was that more than 100,000 Germans were made casualties in Operation Veritable and Grenade, British (and American) casualties were less than 20.000. In Operation Plunder the British went further to make 30,000 German casualties, for an remarkable number of only 4,000 allied casualties. Monty's operations were on the offensive, and yet the Germans suffered a gigantic number of casualties compared to the minimum of the British. Of the three main powers, the British managed the most cost effective advances in the war, while still keeping up the pace, and even facing the majority of the Germans in Normandy, while advancing faster than everyone else after the break-out to Belgium. Patton was stuck in Metz for 3 months and had 50.000 casualties, Bradley had 34.000 in the Hurtgen Forest defeat. The Americans were having manpower troubles after the bulge. - mostly because of their head on tactics and complete lack of interest in keeping their soldiers alive. They counter-attacked in the Bulge not because it was the most sane thing to do, but just to try make Bradley and the Americans at large less humiliated. Monty in the Bulge had the same thinking as in Operation Luttich. Let the Germans go as far as west as possible while minimizing casualties.
    1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1