Comments by "Sammy B" (@sammyb1651) on "Law&Crime Network" channel.

  1. Just warn the boys about female perverts already. What was with all the hand-wringing and agonising over this from Hansen? Stop prioritising a grown adults feelings over a child's safety. We don't have this issue when the sexes are reversed. Clearly women's feelings are considered more important than the safety of boys. Okay...I get it...we pander to womens feelings in literally EVERY other facet of society. That's how our culture works. But NOT here. That is a hard line.
    1
  2. Don't worry. I'm 5 minutes in and a more attractive, younger female officer has arrived to assist. I'm sure that will calm Becky down a bit.
    1
  3.  @Resnullia  And yet I feel no pressure to trade insults as I've seen your profile photo. 🤣
    1
  4. Random internet account diagnosing fake illness. What could possibly go wrong?
    1
  5. Just warn the boys about female perverts already. What was with all the hand-wringing and agonising over this from Hansen? Stop prioritising a grown adults feelings over a child's safety. We don't have this issue when the sexes are reversed. Clearly women's feelings are considered more important than the safety of boys. Okay...I get it...we pander to womens feelings in literally EVERY other facet of society. That's how our culture works. But NOT here. That is a hard line.
    1
  6. WTF is going on with that Court Officer's twitching face?
    1
  7.  @Irishcoleen948  No, women typically get the children as a default. Men get "visitation". Another dishonest contribution, but this time even more obvious.👍
    1
  8. @ No, women typically get the children as a default. Men get "visitation". Another dishonest contribution, but this time even more obvious.👍
    1
  9. ​ @Irishcoleen948  Women tend to be awarded custody. Men get "visitation". As well you know.
    1
  10.  @W47689  Sport is something people play for fun. Thats my point. The dedication shown is to an activity people do for recreational enjoyment, so by any measure t's demonstrably less of a sacrifice.
    1
  11.  @adamhalcyon3393  Sport is something people play for fun. Thats my point. The dedication shown is to an activity people do for recreational enjoyment, so by any measure t's demonstrably less of a sacrifice.
    1
  12.  @rillyjo5810  Yeah, I know. He failed to make it in 2009 I (now) understand.
    1
  13.  overlordfemto7523  Defective logic. Not even going to waste my breath mate.
    1
  14.  overlordfemto7523  Zip it, tinsel t!ts.
    1
  15.  @BOOSIEHUBBARD  Once more in English, please.
    1
  16.  @BOOSIEHUBBARD  I'm sorry, Sir. I'm struggling to understand your point!👍
    1
  17. Too lazy, sadly.
    1
  18. ​@ Sorry, you don't avoid the point that easily. The point is (quite clearly) if a man does that, he's seen as not contributing/a deadbeat. If a woman does that, she's seen as a "dedicated stay at home mom, committed to her kids" Interested you should comment on his domestic chores btw because you're not even permitted to comment on a woman's chores. If she doesn't do them it's because she's too "committed to her kids". Do you see how it works? It's just very interesting how little women value domestic chores/child rearing when it's not them doing it. But when it is them doing it they're Superwoman. Lol! Just demonstrating I can see through your nonsense. 👍
    1
  19.  @Barbara-nv1ll  🤣Triggered.
    1
  20.  @diesel-soul  Much truth in this. The badly disadvantaged situation of men is starting to become more commonly recognised now after decades of shaming. It's very clear that it's unfair. I'd also add: in answer to the OP's why not "just divorce"? I find that a really dishonest question. It's well known that women don't tend to "just divorce". They cheat in order to line the next man up so they've got the next sucker to move on to. They don't tend to leave to nothing, they jump from one man to the next. She could have "just divorced" years ago if she was so unhappy, but instead she chose to line someone else up-which is clearly an additional inflammatory step. Just being real.
    1
  21. ​ @donzell1945  It was a really dishonest question from the OP. It's well known that women don't tend to "just divorce". They cheat in order to line the next man up so they've got the next sucker to move on to. They don't tend to leave to nothing, they jump from one man to the next. She could have "just divorced" years ago if she was so unhappy, but instead she chose to line someone else up-which is clearly an additional inflammatory step. Just being real.
    1
  22. Fairly measured statement. Clearly nothing justifies murder and I don't read anything you said as condoning of what happened. I'd possibly add: not only do men merely have feelings, they're also capable of being abused. If this was a male doing this to a female I think it would be characterised as "abuse" (Most things are considered abuse of women). For instance if the woman was left home to look after the kids, while the guy went out to cheat and THEN (in all likelihood) the woman was facing the prospect of being kicked out of her home and torn away from her children on dissolution of the marriage....my instinct says every woman alive would be calling that abuse. And in all likelihood a defence to murder via temporary insanity. We're finally starting to see a change in the cultural narrative here. Women are starting (at long last) to get some pushback against the way they think that men should be treated. It's very badly overdue.  Just to reiterate, NOTHING justifies murder. However it's become really obvious that many women don't justify (the institution of) marriage either. By the opinions they express, there's really no other conclusion.  If you want to be absolved of marriage commitments so easily, don't ask for marriage in the first place. Accept you're not worthy of the institution. It's really that simple*.  I think we need to really start again with how we look at these things as a society. *Not directed at you btw, Michelle. Your opinions show more mature and balanced thinking and a respect for the institution of marriage.
    1
  23. Sounds pretty chaotic. Kids with other men. Inserts an entire family into his house. "Isn't happy" but "doesn't want to leave him" (presumably because she's there for his house benefits). That's the profile of someone in a constant cycle of becoming unhappy (about anything) and making it everyone else's problem. It puts a huge pressure on partners and is very messy and unfair on her kids. Incidentally if "silent treatment" is abuse now then every man in the country is being abused. Let's just be real. We've got to stop portraying everything men do as abuse while simultaneously taking the view that when women do the same thing the man "deserves it" for doing "something wrong/being "insensitive".🙄
    1
  24.  @sprig.sprout  No. I definitely didn't say that. You just keep replying to made up quotes though by all means.👍
    1
  25.  @TurnOnTheJuice  Well.....uuwe proved his point then. Lol. Cos that looked AWFUL. Female students are just as "consensual". They're flattered to be the object of their teacher's attention. Their consent is utterly invalid however because they're children. We have to stop treating women more leniently just because they're women or just because we believe males can't be victims. The system favours females and that cannot be right in a civilised society. Women have campaigned for equality under law and they need to start experiencing that equality.
    1
  26.  @alwayswoke4664  Nah, that aint it. It's just that the females are getting exposed more nowadays for the perverts that they are. Thankfully.  Girls are more likely to report, boys are less likely to, so women teachers get away with it more.
    1
  27.  @aprilbouknightmarquez6340  For you. NOT for your husband. Lol. That's the material point.
    1
  28. @ No. I don't believe so. But I believe she will have regarded them as her property. Thats how women think. And it's implicit in @areinahensley2739's earlier response also. That's my point.
    1
  29.  @sc4112  No. I don't believe so. But I believe she will have regarded them as her property. Thats how women think. And it's implicit in @areinahensley2739's earlier response also. That's my point.
    1
  30. @ What are you talking about? My point is a general one, as you very clearly understand. You're being deliberately obtuse to avoid the (very valid) point I'm making.
    1
  31. Just warn the boys about female perverts already. What was with all the hand-wringing and agonising over this from Hansen? Stop prioritising a grown adults feelings over a child's safety. We don't have this issue when the sexes are reversed. Clearly women's feelings are considered more important than the safety of boys.  Okay...I get it...we pander to womens feelings in literally EVERY other facet of society. That's how our culture works. But NOT here. That is a hard line.
    1
  32.  @sudilos1172  Of course not. I didnt say it protected her or was an effective deterrent. You've even got the death penalty in multiple States and that hasn't stopped the crime of murder. I was just responding to your silly remark that things "need to change". As though it was in any way illuminating. 🤣
    1
  33.  @jimwerther  Indeed. Thats a very valid point.
    1
  34. It's wild no women sprang to her defence and pulled him off of her immediately. Women are always saying how men should do more to protect women but they'll barely even raise a voice themselves. Women have to do better and risk their lives more instead of just volunteering men to risk their own lives. Smh.
    1
  35. ​ @kandykane2160  I think we have to start recognising that taking a man's home and kids away from him IS a form of abuse/control itself. You glibly describe it as a "tantrum over money" but I'm perfectly satisfied you wouldn't say this if it the roles were reversed. If the woman was losing her home and her children AND being put on the clock to pay the man to enjoy a family life to her exclusion it would be described as some sort of mental and emotional torture.  It's just plainly dishonest when women describe things in this way and I assure you men DO see it when you talk like this. It's an existential trauma, not a "tantrum over money" And whats most sinister is you understand this perfectly well. You don't need it pointing out.
    1
  36.  @kandykane2160  I think we have to start recognising that taking a man's home and kids away from him IS a form of abuse/control itself. You glibly describe it as a "tantrum over money" but I'm perfectly satisfied you wouldn't say this if it the roles were reversed. If the woman was losing her home and her children AND being put on the clock to pay the man to enjoy a family life (at the exclusion of herself) it would be described as some sort of mental and emotional torture. It's just plainly dishonest when women describe things in this way and I assure you men DO see it when you talk like this. It's an existential trauma, not a "tantrum over money" And whats most sinister is you understand this perfectly well. You don't need it pointing out.
    1