Comments by "" (@SnakePliskin762) on "Военное телевидение" channel.

  1. its a last minute short range point defence so doesn't need to be any faster. Please keep up.
    13
  2. They have inertial guidance if GPS jammed.
    11
  3. It still hasn't gained air superiority over Ukraine's tiny air force.
    10
  4. Shame that's all bs for both Abrams & Bradley's
    10
  5. They haven't fought 1 NATO country yet
    9
  6.  @alexpavlov3535  nope, Ukraine crews trained in the west.
    7
  7. They aren't,any tank without cover can be taken out by a drone.
    7
  8. According to Russian bias YT channels
    6
  9. What a load of nonsense
    6
  10. what a load of bs
    5
  11. No it's just fighting Ukraine
    5
  12. ​ @YourGardenerJesús sounds more like Russia after this debacle
    5
  13. What a load of bs
    5
  14.  @Glenoidio  as did a lot of Russian toys,remember that convoy of death on it's way to Kyiv? Still not NATO forces or it's best equipment.
    5
  15. Getting invaded wasn't really a choice.
    5
  16. It didn't shock any first time round.
    5
  17. no
    4
  18.  @Ludak021  NATO hasn't fired a shot or lost a casualty If you could kindly point me in the direction of a NATO armoured reginent or fighter squadron deployed that would be much obliged.
    4
  19. You keep believing that 😂
    4
  20. Ask that su-35 pilot that.
    4
  21. It's never fought NATO
    4
  22. and now a bridge
    4
  23.  @KishorTwist  limited number of soldiers and hardware? 😂
    4
  24. Nope
    4
  25. Nope
    3
  26. Tucker Carlson 😂
    3
  27. ​ @tamdang8346  still holding off a country with a population over 4 x biggerr. Funny that
    3
  28.  @walterbrunswick  That they where American,a lot of volunteers have come from the US,that is if the flags are true,i fail to believe until i've seen it and the source myself. You do realise they've only just allowed maintenance techs in and that's only in the west of the country near the Polish border to allow overhaul of the missile systems and that took some doing.
    3
  29. Bs
    3
  30. ​ @YourGardenerJesús  they weren't a threat then never mind now 😂
    3
  31. 0 dead
    3
  32.  @Rooikunbo  except we do inquests into our training deaths in the west,we also have witnesses. Must be a Russian thing covering up deaths.
    3
  33. ​ @JamieClarke-zk7wo  the same navy that's still there? Just changed carriers over
    3
  34. It's amazing the amount of bollocks Ignat is alleged to have said.
    3
  35. ​ @rogeroeyen If only those YT vids where real life hey
    3
  36. ​ @lexburen5932  There's plenty of sources able to list what Russia has lost.
    3
  37. @Benz2533  old assets which still needed a NK intervention to contain.
    3
  38. 1 challenger to how many Russian tanks? and the crew survived
    3
  39. ​ @FTM1fenn according to you?
    3
  40. The F-16 that downed the Su-35?
    3
  41.  @KishorTwist  With your writing? You make Joe Biden look like Albert Einstein.
    3
  42. The one that fell off was below deck fell off the elevator. 2nd malfunctioned landing.
    3
  43. NATO isn't fighting. Ukraine & Russia are.
    3
  44. course it did....
    2
  45.  @Its_JasonBourne  the agreement part is nonsense spread on X are B-2s stored in the open? 8 completely destroyed and the rest damaged but unless they can reopen the production line for Tu-95s and Tu-22s,they're a write off
    2
  46.  @Its_JasonBourne  Tu-160 takes a long time to build,it'll take a long time to replace both the tu-22 and Tu-95s with it and that's without the sanctions biting for the parts needed for them. I never said they could hide all the tu-95s in hangers,the B-2s have to be stored in special climate controlled hangers for their coating.
    2
  47. ​ @journeyintococo6996 I never said it would but losing 30-70% of your strategic bomber force in this way is quite an embarrassment for Russia.
    2
  48. nope
    2
  49.  @jameschalkwig787  absolute bs,only one has been shot down and that was a friendly fire.
    2
  50. Proof = Russian claims and a made up YT vid
    2