General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Hindustan Times
comments
Comments by "" (@SnakePliskin762) on "Hindustan Times" channel.
Previous
3
Next
...
All
You been at the drinks cabinet?
3
@louise_rose You can tell you've zero experience in these matters. The air power deployed for the Kosovo campaign would be enough to wreck Russia,never mind what was deployed in Vietnam and GW1. This type of campaign is what we train regular for,a target rich environment. With mechanised forces suported by an extensive logistical tail. Russia's struggling against an army with little numbers in both airpower,logistics and numbers of modern equipment,imagine what would happen going against a full NATO strike package,mechanised force supported by AH64s etc. The mind boggles that Russians think it would be the same result.
3
@louise_rose actually its something we train for regular,hence why the west have far more flying hours & training budgets than their equivalent Russians. You should read some credible aviation sources in regards to this rather than getting your info from the hindustan times.
3
@budmaister1799 assumptions without any substance or fact, just like most of the Russian intel on these channels
3
Who did Nato invade?
3
Russia claimed.... Yet no ships sunk,no extensive damage and only 2 people slightly injured and..do they honestly think supplies would be going by ship 😂
3
End of rotation,Carl Vinson is on it's way
3
Is this the 3rd or 4th carrier they haven't hit?
3
@Grant80 the black sea fleet says otherwise
3
Nato isn't involved to be humiliated.
3
@Reacher_007 Threads 1983
3
It's international airspace
3
Those storm shadows and ATACMS still doing the business. If you keep away from RT and YT.
3
What a load of bs 😂
3
@graemes52 neither are on their way
3
Bit early to be drinking
3
@darkcloud5830 What NATO members are fighting? Where are the F35s? Apaches? etc I'll wait...
3
If they where as you speak, the war would've been over.
2
@mooz01 😂
2
Because it's 💩?
2
Not one's been hit,explain how they can't protect them?
2
Because it's 🐂💩?
2
Only those who are desperate blame it on this NATO nonsense
2
The companies whose equipment it is,such as Raytheon.
2
@reymurad they'll be going to the companies plus extra for hazard pay etc. Be a nice earner that
2
😂
2
So no reason to have a Ranger tat,more complete bs
2
@gsingh5826 what nato fighter squadron and regiments are deployed?
2
Where did you draw that conclusion? Last night's vodka binge?
2
@giftonlemani5288 that makes no sense whatsoever.
2
Stop talking sense
2
@paulcauchi7874 NATO isn't fighting or can you prove otherwise? Seen any F35s over the battlefield?
2
They couldn't do either
2
@checo8187 0 corpses 0 proof silly sausage,they haven't set foot on the battlefield
2
@uralprospector is that your proof,a deserter? 😂 Yep that's definite cast iron that NATOs there. Jesus wept
2
Based on what this channel puts out?
2
More toilet times
2
@MrPilgrimuk the west didn't invade, Putin did with his crazy empire building.
2
@AchicaMkd what units?
2
@kaspertube512 Up there with Belarus and Azerbaijan
2
@glamour-lifestyle Russia took it's half in 1939,making a deal with the devil.
2
You keep believing all that....
2
Putin going?
2
more utter AI bollocks
2
You won't see it on here,it makes Disney look believable
2
@aaaaaa2206 you had a can?
2
@paulcauchi7874 except it didn't leave because of that,if it did why is another carrier taking it's place?
2
It was a flag the other week now a tattoo,who writes this turd?
2
@fridahmwila8367 NATO never fired a shot or invaded a country. Russia did.
2
@sugarpuffbutty course they are,i don't see any Israeli leaders getting taken out by Iran or it's proxies daily do you.
2
Previous
3
Next
...
All