Comments by "" (@SnakePliskin762) on "Hindustan Times" channel.

  1.  @g.m.8360  technical issue either aircraft or the ship,happened earlier this year aswell with a friendly fire.
    2
  2. That makes zero sense whatsoever
    2
  3. ​ @shubhamsingh-cx2cq  I'd lay off the vodka mate
    2
  4. ​ @doug753 which conspiracies would they be?
    2
  5. ​ @MrLeadb1 its used on military targets. Hence why Russia has had to pull back it's fighters from Airfields in range.
    2
  6. It's because it's bollocks
    2
  7. No NATO country has entered the fight yet. Thought I'd give you an update if it's hard to follow.
    2
  8.  @katsrk3039  is that a streetshiting chart?
    2
  9.  @MohamedAlly-c8t  well having worked in European industry i can concur you or your friend is talking complete shite. Who do you think the arab countries employ as their health & safety advisors?
    2
  10. It worked like all the other systems
    2
  11. You are correct
    2
  12. ​ @willyvanroy2523  or edit pics from 2022 😂
    2
  13. ​ @coinomist924  no it isn't
    2
  14. It's because Russia hasn't got the ability to do any of that.
    2
  15. Doesn't look staged at all....
    2
  16. No they're not
    2
  17.  @samanthagalagama1920  Negative
    2
  18. You should try rehab.
    2
  19. Claimed 😂
    2
  20.  @dejanelakovic776  you been called up to this fodder yet?
    2
  21. Nope
    2
  22.  @salihbegovic  is this in code?
    2
  23. ​ @kaitlynnheiselman-w5e  it did but neither ship was crippled.
    2
  24. @carolinetapia8568 is patient another word for 'this isn't going as planned'
    2
  25. None from independent news channels,crew,families of crew,naval literature nothing Because its complete bs
    2
  26. They couldn't hit civilian or military,completely inept
    2
  27. What a load of bs
    2
  28.  @shaoliten1  make sure you put a lol at the end to remind us you're a wally.
    2
  29. Clickbait headline
    2
  30.  @thewhizzard6022  I've explained the reaaons behind why i believe above. You've offered no counter argument or substantive proof to any of it. It's not just media,it's thousands of people to keep stumm,basically impossible.
    2
  31. Strange that,it's almost like this channel is telling 💩
    2
  32. The same as the other was forced to leave but then replaced on station by another,this clowns a joke.
    2
  33. So no ships just houthi craft destroyed. Another bollocks headline.
    2
  34. Payback,more like Putin playing Russian roulette with 6 bullets
    2
  35. ​ @lahdahnowens7490 incorrect
    2
  36. You keep dreaming that if it helps you sleep better.
    2
  37.  @ccahill2322  You don't need to be an expert to research Aviation,the industry is quite transparent with it's information. Why your grasping at straws with a story about a ship from the 1960s no one knows.
    2
  38. ​ @romeomilu you're wrong.
    2
  39. Good job what you're saying is complete bollocks. F16s,SU-27s are flying freely and into Russia. Explain that.
    2
  40. Dumb choice of bs,the train is from 2022
    2
  41.  @pooooornopigeon  i know,but we didn't scream and shout that we where fighting them did we.
    2
  42. ​ @trippypages7309 so they're a warmonger based on what you think? And you told him to get a grip 😂
    2
  43. Course he did....😂
    2
  44. ​ @ramathanabdallah6493  show me a NATO member fighting? If you can't you're a dummy.
    2
  45. ​​ @justwondering147 difference is the US is there by invite and not to steal resources.
    2
  46. nuclear* and what do you think would happen to Russia in return?
    2
  47.  @PlacidDragon  just post without hyperlink and type. Production is on going,most of the aid to Ukraine has gone on production.
    2
  48. ​ @russtorque2993 3 years against a much weaker country than the UK and still in a slog. You need to look at the facts.
    2
  49.  @Salom-td9ls  okay where is the dogfights against the f35s and F22s? Tomahawks? Maybe a few AH-64 making an appearance? I'll wait...
    2
  50. ​ @phoenixrising8640 years after NATO withdrew *
    2