Comments by "Lepi Doptera" (@lepidoptera9337) on "Dr. John Campbell" channel.

  1. Yes, I am sure the virus pays the media, kid. ;-)
    1
  2. Fake news. :-)
    1
  3.  @christinebrown6689  75 pages of fake news. Other guys claim it's 55,000 pages or 18 pages. All bullshit, kid. :-)
    1
  4. They warned you early. You didn't listen. They told you to wear masks. You didn't listen. They told you to get vaccinated. You didn't listen. They told you to socially distance. You didn't listen. What else do you want? A pat on the back for being idiots who don't listen? :-)
    1
  5. My antivaxxer relatives followed your advice for the second time now. All eight of them. Another couple that I know did even better and had it a third time in a row. I think they are trying to set a record. He even has long COVID for extra points! ;-)
    1
  6. Question what? That there are plenty of idiots who still want to play viral reproduction organ? That's a fact. ;-)
    1
  7. Relatives of mine had the "classical" Chinese sinovac vaccine. They also had COVID-19 three times. Why do you want to take a vaccine that is not effective?
    1
  8. @Limeade We already do. They are very safe. :-)
    1
  9. @Limeade Yes, in 2013. :-)
    1
  10. Yes, it works so well that my eight antivaxxer relatives have already acquired it twice. ;-)
    1
  11. Death rates didn't plummet. They can only go up. The good doctor seems to have lost his mind with this headline.
    1
  12. Worked for China just fine. :-)
    1
  13. And if you haven't been, yet, then you will be. ;-)
    1
  14. Hospital statistics indicate that many hospitals in the US are still over capacity. "Mild" disease alone is not enough. This is a multidimensional problem and most people can not think in more than black and white, not even when their lives depend on it, like now.
    1
  15. Also because my eight antivaxxer relatives had COVID-19 twice now. ;-)
    1
  16. The Chinese have been defeating covid since Q1 2020. They and nobody else.
    1
  17. Life doesn't run on belief, kid. It runs on knowledge, of which you don't have much, of course.
    1
  18.  @kennyopinmind7558  I am never having any. Drinking is not good for the mind, as all the antivaxxer folks here who are obviously heavy drinkers are demonstrating. ;-)
    1
  19.  @kennyopinmind7558  You are obviously also pro flat Earth, so who gives a frell? :-)
    1
  20. Almost a million by now.
    1
  21. I don't know about the previous infection being protective. The anti-vaxxer side of my family was infected very early in 2020. They just got covid again about a month ago and it was pretty bad for each of them. I would like to see how much protection is left in previously infected after a year and a half.
    1
  22. Well, we here in the US had a over a million deaths by now... so I don't know about you... but one in three hundred people dying is kind of considered dangerous. If a company sold a shaver that would cut the arteries of one in three hundred men, it would be put out of business by regulators quite quickly. This many deaths don't seem to be much of concern where you live, though. :-)
    1
  23. I thing I have heard another troll use that line before. That was lazy. ;-)
    1
  24. And there is the lonely kid, again. ;-)
    1
  25. So what did you learn, except that these vaccines are safe? :-)
    1
  26. And there is the lonely kid. :-)
    1
  27.  @CraftEccentricity  I don't understand? How does that impact the fact that you are just a lonely kid who is looking for attention? :-)
    1
  28. Why is that wrong? :-)
    1
  29. Ah, there is the kid who needs attention, again. ;-)
    1
  30. Adam took some really bad street sh*t 2 weeks after he got vaccinated. So what? :-)
    1
  31. And now you are just looking for shallow excuses for your paranoia.
    1
  32.  @sw7366  Paranoia is a symptom of a malfunctioning brain. It's not the same thing as a well designed clinical trial. ;-)
    1
  33.  @sw7366  That is correct. You aren't designing anything scientific. I love you anyway, kid, even if your Mom didn't. :-)
    1
  34. Is Trump back in the White House, yet? :-)
    1
  35. Yes, there is a lot of fake news on the internet. There is also the rumor that a guy was resurrected 2000 years ago. That one is also not true. ;-)
    1
  36. Worked wonderfully for my relatives. They had it for the second and the third time now. :-)
    1
  37. Natural immunity worked great for my relatives. Eight of them had COVID-19 only twice and two others were lucky enough to catch it only three times. Just imagine what would have happened without natural immunity! :-)
    1
  38. That we don't care about antibodies is simply not true. This is a fast multiplying virus. A high antibody titer means a fast response to an infection, which means a low peak of viral particle count before the immune system can limit the disease. Without those antibodies the B- and T-cell response takes considerably longer, which leads to a much higher viral particle concentration, which makes the person both more infectious and more sick. There is so much false information about the biology of this out there that we might as well talk about the birth of a new religion. People are looking for a new resurrection here. There is none. Hospitalized patients are still dying in large numbers and that won't stop with the end of this wave, either. It will continue periodically as the antibody counts in people decrease after vaccination and/or infection. We can either actively eliminate this disease completely or it will be with us for a long time. Why people don't get this is very hard to understand. We all had the flu and the common cold regularly in the past, didn't we? What is, supposedly, the biological difference here? I mean, other than that this is a much more deadly disease?
    1
  39. Testing is of no importance for the country. The only things of importance are hospitalizations and deaths. You are clearly not a very smart one. ;-)
    1
  40. And there is the lonely kid with the god shtick. ;-)
    1
  41.  @alaskansourdoughwormsgarde4392  And there is the silly person on the internet who threatens everybody with his invisible friend. :-)
    1
  42. Essentially that is what he is saying, yes. Worst advice ever.
    1
  43. Three cases of COVID? Most likely there were many more cases of COVID in your village.
    1
  44.  @silentnot4812  You can ask the virus all the questions you want. Viruses don't have ears. ;-)
    1
  45. Testing for testing's sake is completely irrelevant. It only appeals to people who have OCD and can't stand it that not everything in life is perfect. The only relevant metric is how much covid stresses the healthcare systems and that, of course, is always known precisely.
    1
  46.  @LJ-wo1wf  Whether the numbers are rising or falling can be easily seen by the ER triage nurses. Again, unless you are testing to prevent future infection by others, which most people don't do because they don't really give a frell, then testing doesn't do a thing.
    1
  47.  @LJ-wo1wf  Nobody "needs" the test results. You need to get tested before you get on a plane. That will reduce infections somewhat. Truthfully, even for that purpose you would have to test negative, then quarantine for three to five days and get tested, again, to make sure that the plane is covid free. Testing for testing's sake is magical thinking. There are, unfortunately, a lot of three year old magical thinkers around.
    1
  48.  @LJ-wo1wf  Unless you act on what you see, the act of seeing is completely irrelevant. The only relevant cases of the virus are the ones that clog up the healthcare system. If you were to test everybody daily and you would quarantine and contract trace, then, yes, it would make all the difference in the world. The only country that does that is China. Even Singapore gave up on it.
    1
  49. In other words... reality doesn't agree with you, kid. I will give you my attention, anyway. :-)
    1
  50.  @kayyr.9909  I am still here and I am listening to every one of your idiocies. :-)
    1