Comments by "Me Here" (@mehere8038) on "Business Insider"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@xxguardian_axx5635 The thing to remember is weight & transport. He's removing the weight from the product, while leaving the bit that burns well & making it into a uniform size for easy bulk packaging & sales. Additionally it burns clean, with all the wood gasses removed in his process. That's important in preventing long term health issues if using indoor cooking with restricted ventilation. There's a reason most in the west buy charcoal products for their BBQ, instead of buying the raw wood, even though raw wood gives the meat a better taste. It's just much more convenient & cheaper & burns with much less smoke. If burning directly works for you, that's great, but to transport to others, charcoal is the way to go.
Why don't you test it for yourself & see? Have you ever cooked with charcoal? Give it a try. If you don't want to buy it, get an old tin, punch a small hole into it's lid, then fill with coconut husks & put the lid on & put that onto your fire while cooking something else. By the time you've finished, that tin should be filled with charcoal. Next time you want to cook something, try using your charcoal instead of coconut husks & see how it compares. See how long it burns for & compare that to it's size & weight & what you normally have to use in raw husks to acheive the same & see how smoke free it is too!
1
-
1
-
@b.m.5068 I didn't think you necessarily were & I think there's a few in your thread that are not, but in reality, most who read your thread probably will be, so it's them I'm speaking to with my comment on buying coconuts, as they are the ones that need to change their behaviour if they want to easily help those that they have caused problems for & could very easily help.
My other comments on the tin on the fire to make bio-char from coconuts aren't really directed to westerners, if they were, I'd tell them to put the tin on their stovetop instead. That one's for people already using fires & coconut fibres as fuel & also with a little land they can use to grow a few veggies, but not necessarily the money for anything extravagant. I did actually do the process myself, in the west, but ultimately in my situation, it was more efficient for me to switch to buying sustainably sourced charcoal & putting that into my garden instead of trying to make it myself at home, due to the extra fuel I had to use to fuel my bio-char creation (I still use the urine to 'charge" it for use, but most in the west would use purchased animal manure cause the urine would gross them out, even though the urine is actually the better product to use, as it's nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium percentages are much better)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
it's still cultural though. In Australia a lot of people don't bother with the returning, same way they just throw couches & everything else they're replacing onto the footpath instead of selling second hand. I live next door to a block of 100 units & it's incredible the stuff I get just by having a quick look at what's been thrown away each time I take rubbish out. Funny think is, there are people who will collect the 10cent cans/bottles, while not bothering to touch any of the other stuff thrown away. As an example, I got a working riobi jigsaw a while back, missed the chainsaw cause another person got it a few minutes before me. He left the jigsaw cause he didn't want it personally & had no desire to waste time trying to sell it. He also asked me if I wanted his dozen or so bottles he was chucking, cause he couldn't be bothered taking them the 100 metres or so to the recycling centre (I said no, cause I also couldn't be bothered doing that for only a dollar or so). My pet birds also love all the furniture they get purely to chew on for fun. If it's natural materials, I'll take it, let my birds shred it, then return it to the rubbish & grab a new piece of furniture for them to chew. Their cage frame is made mostly from pram & walker & bike wheels & aluminium framing from the disposal site by my home, they even have suspension on their cage wheels! It's cultural
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I very much doubt that water claim is legit! Sugarcane probably is the highest water using crop per hectare, but that would be because it's also the crop that produces BY FAR the most product & bio-mass per hectare.
What's the per calorie water use of sugarcane vs soy & corn? Sugarcane would be far lower than soy, I'll bet! Corn is probably on par, because sugarcane & corn are both C4 photosynthesisers, that means they're 200 times more efficient in water use per molecule of carbon fixed into the plant (growth) when compared to C3 plants, so no way they're using more water per calorie than C3 plants like soy, wheat, oats, rice, bamboo, hemp, various trees etc etc
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1