Comments by "Stephen Villano" (@spvillano) on "The Lincoln Project"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
OK, Trump for POTUS then, the Constitution is null and void forever.
Since you hate having a Constitution, summary execution instead of arrest. Corruption of blood on misdemeanor as well.
Article III, section 3
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
So, you're either saying, despite no evidence possible to support it, that Trump has taken up arms and made war against the government or that Congress has secretly declared war and Trump has given aid and comfort to the enemy and should be immediately imprisoned for it without trial.
Either way, that you hate having a Constitution.
So, what's the difference who is now god-emperor of the Empire of the United States?
1
-
@thaisstone5192 I see that elementary reading was never taught to you.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
So, in your version of the world, levying war requires Congress to declare war, so the war of 1812 wasn't a war, since Congress couldn't meet when Washington D.C. was burning. That means Benedict Arnold was never a traitor or something similarly insane.
Levying war means taking up arms. Trump wouldn't take up arms, he's too great a coward to do that. A case might be made for sedition and even for advocating for the overthrow of the US government, both serious felonies. Treason, nope, Congress didn't declare war, so he couldn't have an enemy to give aid and comfort to. He sure as hell wouldn't risk himself by taking up arms. So, treason is impossible.
And even sedition is dicey, as one would have to show that mens rea existed and that he fully and overtly ordered violence be employed for the purpose of unseating our government. Not by preponderance of evidence, but beyond a reasonable doubt. Laughably, sedition has been proved against leaders of Proud Boys, those convicted already now serving their sentences and Oath Keepers trials are ongoing. Still no direct Trump ties to any such orders.
But, there is ample evidence to support his advocacy for the overthrow of the government via an attack on said government, specifically Congress and blocking of its Constitutional powers and the penalties are equal with sedition.
Shall we instead stay with having a Constitution then?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@annakingry9157 here are some interesting words, show me the levying of war.
Article III, Section 3, Clause 1:
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
Come on, show me where anyone picked up guns and shot at US government officers in an effort to overthrow the US government. Show me the two eyewitnesses that will testify in open court. Hell, show me a naughty cub scout with a slingshot.
There can be no aid and comfort to the enemy, as Congress has declared no war since WWII, so we're fresh out of enemies.
Without the levying of war, there is no treason, so stop being like MAGAts and stick here in the real and factual world or stay the fuck off of our side. Because, we do believe in law and order, the rule of law and the foundation of that law is our Constitution. Such bullshit of claiming treason for whatever you don't like undermines any moral and factual authority one might've previously had and parallels the MAGAt religion.
Besides, I can make one bastard from hell of a case for sedition just on 1/6 alone, subsequent actions only adding additional counts.
Besides, we all know that they're far too cowardly to pick up a gun. The streak of yellow down all MAGA backs can be seen from space.
1
-
1
-
Annoyingly, I was basically breaking even, compensation wise.
I guess Trump wants all quarantines ignored.
But, oddly, has his official perpetual quarantine surrounding his bunker and bunkers offal office.
A 26 day old infant died of COVID-19, perhaps Sierra should pay his respects in person! And to prove his claims, lack both nostrils.
Oops, I forgot, he's The Bunker Boy. Especially with germs that he once said he didn't believe in and shortly after, admitted to a phobia of.
Afraid of what one just claimed didn't exist?
Thats the honest of a street where, but less honorable. One of the two doesn't kiss and tell.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rylian21 no, we'd still have plenty of members of the House and operable, a Speaker, who is first in the line of succession, even if a quorum isn't present, pending selection of a new President by vote in Congress, selection in the House, approval in the Senate. The post may not remain vacant during that interim period.
If the Speaker is not able to assume the post, then it goes to President Pro Tempore of the Senate.
That's why both houses of Congress terms begin on 3-Jan, while POTUS begins 20-Jan, to ensure no vacancy is present, leaving the nation without a functional branch of government.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
No, the Lord of the Lies Trump isn't guilty for an entire fucking planet, there's plenty of blame to go around.
He does own tens of thousands of US graves though.
Not much better, since he was responsible, regardless of his desire. He rejected it because "the numbers make me look bad".
Odd, when I was in charge of a debacle, the very first question I asked was, "How did I take a winning team and lead them into this mess, what did I fuck up?!", then responded accordingly, with full input from that winning team, accepting my own fuck-up before all, asking forgiveness and input on how to unfuck the situation.
You know, actually leading.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1