General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Thor Nado
DW News
comments
Comments by "Thor Nado" (@ThorNado24) on "DW News" channel.
Previous
2
Next
...
All
@zeroZheng2 I did not use my own opinion or historical interpretation. The documented facts are publicly known for everyone with reason as basis of the rule of law. Literally you agree with it. That's also known by the entire world and majority of reasonable CN pl to understand correctly.
1
@Monkehrawrrr It's time for you learn and educated yourself what free country means. We know you serve only a one-party. Try to read the 2023 EIU Democracy Index.
1
@Monkehrawrrr Your previous comment you don't know what free means now you want to prove that republics are not democracies. Lol ! You know nothing. I repeat read the 2023 democracy index to educate yourself.
1
@Monkehrawrrr Here are thoughts for you. The 2023 index is a list of all countries in the world ranking the no.1 the country with highest degree of freedom and democracy. The list includes the republics (The government leader is usually the president) and monarchies (The government leader is usually the prime minister). Democracy is the system of government where the leaders are elected and accountable by the people. Political freedom refers to the rights and entitlements of citizens to express their views and participate in the political process without restriction or fear of retribution.
1
@火焰猫燐 China won't allow you to show if the party in power sees it a threat. In the true democratic country, an ordinary citizen has the right to express or criticize without restraint within the framework of the rule of law.
1
@杜爽-o6p True democratic countries treat each other equal within the shared values of human freedom.
1
@wiskwu 美国及其盟国正在尽最大努力通过威慑维护和平 中国对东南亚和台湾海域的非法主张可能会导致武装冲突。The United States and its allies are doing their best to maintain peace by deterring China’s unlawful claims to maritime Southeast Asia sea and Taiwan sovereignty which could lead to armed conflict.
1
@wiskwu 自二战以来,美国的军事存在遍布亚洲和全世界,并与盟国合作。 最近与韩国、日本、东南亚和澳大利亚加强合作联盟是对中国侵略性非法行为的积极回应。
1
@火焰猫燐 特朗普是个商人。他的兴趣是让美国和世界各国达成良好的贸易协议。他想要和平。美国人想要和平,台湾人和中国人想要和平。每个人都想要和平。唯一的问题是中国政府中的几个老家伙妄想占领领土来统治以满足他们对权力的贪婪。
1
@火焰猫燐 特朗普是个商人。他的兴趣是让美国和世界各国达成良好的贸易协议。他想要和平。美国人想要和平,台湾人和中国人想要和平。每个人都想要和平。唯一的问题是中国政府中的几个老家伙妄想占领领土来统治以满足他们对权力的贪婪。
1
@とうごうべんけい Be specific what you want to say.
1
@とうごうべんけい Why?
1
@とうごうべんけい Taiwan was under temporary occupation by the US and Allies before the peace treaty in 1952. That's why American soldiers were there to support the Chiang-Kai-Shek troops. Martial law was lifted in 1987 after the external threats subsided which lead to open up democracy. Taiwan is now a model country maintaining Asia's no1 in freedom and democracy among the citizens.
1
@とうごうべんけい US country relations does not necessarily mean support. It is easier for the US to make alliances with countries having shared values of freedom and democracy.
1
@とうごうべんけい Bullying the small peaceful neighbors and aggressively taking action to steal their small piece of territory are not only inhumane but also ruthless. A friend in need is a friend indeed. The world is doing something to deter aggressors.
1
@tony1duan The US has official relations with all countries which do no mean support. In case of war, the military alliance is according to the rule of law particularly the defense treaties between the democratic countries. Note: The alliance is always defensive against aggressors.
1
@tony1duan Those unofficial involvement as you claim is complicated with many variable reasons. They were decided according to intelligence reports to protect the US interests. They do not relate to the current issue of China's muscling up to grab territories of other countries by unlawful means.
1
@Buster-mz3ee Please make show any proof before making judgement otherwise the naiveness and ignorance is you.
1
@tony1duan Not one documented to support you own wrong opinions. Better read my previous which cite the documented facts.
1
@jacksmith-mu3ee Outsiders should instead help to convince the govt of China to endorse Taiwan's application to the UN.
1
@jacksmith-mu3ee Outsiders are non-TAiwanese. JUst to be clear.
1
@jacksmith-mu3ee In simple reminder, it's a Taiwan issue not China. Taiwan people wants official representation to the world for the country of 70 years in existence. Nothing is clearer than that.
1
@jacksmith-mu3ee I repeat this thousands times as in the past comments. Your claim is baseless, illegal and against the rule of law according to the documented facts. Please don't repeat your unsubstantiated claim like a bot. Be factual.
1
@ustcarter wrong. The US 1979 opening ties with PRC was strategic ambiguity. Search it.
1
@markdrewett149 Be specific.
1
@gameli9932 Like the rest of countries, the US has official relations with SA. Let's say good relations because US and SA usually agree in peace deals on the Midde east regions. US and China has also good relation since opening ties in 1979 which bring China from poor giant into now superpower status. But the recent bullying behavior of the government against small and weak neighbors has broken the rule of peace and harmony. The Chinese military enforcing the will of other countries sovereignty is violation of international law. The US and the world to create an alliance is just a response to deter the escalation back to normalcy.
1
@Zyhysj Iran and China are similar controlled by party with extremist ideology. Islamism and communism.
1
@Zyhysj 中国和伊朗有着相似的共产主义和伊斯兰主义极端意识形态。
1
@Zyhysj 在最新的 2023 年民主指数中,伊朗排名 153 位,中国排名 148 位,垫底。中国实行共产主义法律,而伊朗则遵循古老的伊斯兰法律。
1
@MuhammadQureshi-l1l Only when at peace and harmony.
1
@韩轩-l5l what is non-sense? say something factual not lies.
1
@xiaoqianghan Two thıngs go together for Taıwan ranked noç1 ın Freedom and Democracy ın Asıa. 1. Free country where the government does not control what people say or do for political reasons and where people can express their opinions without punishment 2. Democracy is a government of the people, by the people and for the people' The political leaders from the highest position of the president to the lowest local government is through democratic election by every voting citizen . That election by citizen voting rights is the true representation of freedom and democracy.
1
@AhabPiquard China is the name of the country founded by Dr.Sun, the first president of ROC. government. At the time of founding in 1912, Taiwan was already Japanese territory since 1895. When PRC was proclaimed as government of China in 1949, Taiwan was still a Japanese territory until the peace treaty in 1952. One thing is clear, there is ZERO reason and grossly illegal for PRC government to claim Taiwan.
1
@kochmurdochsoroska-shingma5839 because you have nothing to argue.
1
@AhabPiquard you are ignorant. During the WWII, Taiwan and Japan mainland were one country and the Taiwanese military were fighting under the Japan Imperial forces.
1
@accn66 US is following the rule based on international defense treaties vs PRCs lawless bullying actions to disturb peace. Its common sense.
1
@闻博-e4p China and Taiwan are two separate land territories ruled by different governments. Taiwan (1624) is older than China (1912). Facts don't lie.
1
@AhabPiquard you know nothing at all.
1
@AhabPiquard Taiwan gained independence from Japan after the peace treaty 1952. That's the documented fact. Other claims are just lies.
1
@AhabPiquard 1952 SFPT. Learn it.
1
@AhabPiquard No treaty or written document about one-China policy. You are fooled of nothing.
1
@AhabPiquard When China was founded in 1912, Taiwan was already a Japanese territory since 1895. So it's wrong for PRC government to say One-China includes Taiwan because it a big lie.
1
@AhabPiquard In short, Taiwan was already 300 year old state when China was born in 1912. Get it?
1
@AhabPiquard Some Facts for to learn. RoC officially inherited the land territories by Imperial edict from Qing country to new name China in 1912. RoC did not give PRC inheritance but stole the lands. Until now the ROC has the historical right to claim back and rule their stolen territory again at least in paper.
1
@AhabPiquard Before 1912, there was no China yet and the last Qing has officially written not to interfere anywhere beyond the sea since 1895. So clearly 1949 PRC has no right. So its ridiculous to mention a fantasy book written by an ancient people of Dynasty.
1
@AhabPiquard The last Qing officially ceded Taiwan permanently to Japan in 1895 before China was born in 1912. So it has no relevance to mention anything including the book of ancient people of dynasty.
1
@AhabPiquard False claim. A big lie. No valid documents to show that.
1
@peterwang5272 So you use another name because you can't prove the false claims?
1
@CharlesSummers-b3p The US and the world do not agree with PRC's one-China principle.
1
@Snake-i7x Sorry for you. No valid document based on rule of law to support PRC's false claim on Taiwan.
1
Previous
2
Next
...
All