Comments by "Kat 1515" (@Kat-fq4ei) on "Johnny Harris" channel.

  1. Yes, they took your land to found a great nation🇺🇸 And give Native Americans privileges not experienced in other Americas Latin countries. You have thousands of acres of sovereign lands, and thousands more lands returned back to you, and millions of dollars in tribal annual budget, casinos and other enterprises, if you can't pay, we the American tax payer picks up the tab.... Such niceties, Indians from across the border are ready to claim your lands as their stolen lands.
    37
  2.  @Solidsnaik  If you're an immigrant the SW is not your ancestral homeland simply because your ancestors are from south of the border, Mexico. . They were never in the SW and had no lands to loose.. . The SW population, living in the SW before Mexico gained independence 1824 stayed in their ancestral SW homeland 25 years later after the Mexican War and Treaty of Hidalgo agreement to become American citizens. They lost no lands and many still live in in ancestral lands and the SW Indians such as Apache, Navajo, Ute, Comanche Yaqui etc still live in their inherent ancient land in the United States. You need a SW history lesson. El SW no eran pais de gente de Mexico, nunca eran herencia de SW, nomas venieron mucho mas tarde de immigrante.
    19
  3. California was claimed and founded by Spain, Spaniards approx 1540. Colonized by Spain in 1770 and belonged to Spain for almost 275 years. Mexico claimed California for only 25 years, California not ancestrally Mexico. In fact Americans settled in California 1821 just about the same time Mexican government officials took over California from Spain. Many Americans migrated to California after the Mexican War with the US westward movement. Mexican and Chinese were also immigrating at this time. But it was the 1910 Mexican Revolution that attracted Mexicans to the north escaping Mexico's government instabilities. While Spain founded the first Spanish Colonial settlements to guard California against Russian claims in an isolated wilderness desert in northern New Spain, with a few years of Mexican intervention 1821-1846 during which Mexico quasi controlled California which was not part of Mexico's main; it was the United States who made modern California what it today.
    15
  4. Did the movie explain that California and all the SW were under Mexico's rule for only 25 years, known as the SW Mexican Period. That's about the extent of "was once Mexico"... There was no Mexico or Mexican before 1824. California, Texas and New Mexico got their names from Spain starting in 1550 to become territories of New Spain through Spains explorations by land and sea. "California" was a mythological tale in Spain extended to the New World. Texas was named after Louisiana Caddo tribes. California and New Mexico extended to Nevada, Utah, Colorado, Arizona lands all claimed by Spain. What are today NM, TX, CA were colonized by Spain. Towns like Santa Fe, Taos (Don Fernando), Albuquerque, Socorro, El Paso, San Antonio, Nachotiches, San Diego, San Francisco, Monte Rey were early Spanish Colonial settlements 1598-1770 of the Spanish Colonial Period of 250 years up to 1821. Nevada, Utah, Colorado were not colonized during the Spanish Period. The Amerindians were northern tribes as Shasta, Chumash, Mohave, Piaute, Shoshone, Ute, Pueblo, Comanche, Caddo, Kiowa, Navajo, Apache Pawnee and many more. Mexico/Mexican were late arrivals to the SW after 1824. It was Mexican officials who transplanted north after Mexican independence 1821-1848 Mexican Period. Generally Mexicans didn't migrate north until post Mexican War years approx 1880, after USA westward movement, and after the US government quelled the thousands of unconquered tribes in the SW, and placing in reservations. Mexicans established towns in CA, NM, TX border areas. Americans, settlEd in CA and NM 1821; and TX shortly after, with Mexican issued land grant settlements as Texas was vast unpopulated lands and Mexico needed settlers. Trains, the 1910 Mexican Revolution brought more Mexicans. Americans built the SW, Americans influenced the SW as well as Mexican and Chinese in California. Mexicans were deported in the 1950s. There were not a high percent of Mexicans in California until the turn of the 21st century with uncontrolled illegal migration. Mexicans are immigrants to the USA and do not share an indigenous tribal heritage to northern tribes who are not Mexican. And Mexicans ancestors are not rooted in California, New Mexico or Texas. No parts of the SW are ancestrally Mexico. I didn't see the Hollywood movie, but sure it didn't go into SW history. My guess is its an immigrants story...
    13
  5. The United States crossed Indian territory borders -- CA, TX an NM were controlled by northern tribes, it was their borders they crossed. Mexico during the 25 years it claimed these provinces never conquered the Indians. In fact, Mexico was at war with the Yaqui, Navajo, Apache, Ute, Comanche, Kiowa, the lands belonged to them, they never acknowledged Mexico. After the Mexican War, the United States defeated these tribes. Problem with the Gadson Purchase, and Treaty of G Hidalgo border is it was too far north, excluding a good part of Mexico that would have preferred the United States. Always looking north.
    11
  6. Your not populating again. You were never in the territories to begin with so you are populating for the first time. Your ancestors are from Mexico, not the USA.
    11
  7.  @bemotivated8443  European settlers turned out fine for the United States, land was turned over into a great nation, from sea to sea🇺🇸
    10
  8.  @oirampeceda2409  fair is winning the war, victor has always taken the spoils, it's written into mans DNA... Mexico is no exception. Mexico stole New Spain as Spain never Treaty'd their lands over to Mexico. And Mexico makes a mountain of a molehill on those 25 years over USA annexed lands which were not ancestrally Mexico to begin with, as they make it sound...
    9
  9. The issue is not the conquest of Mexico. The problem is the border, which was a wilderness area for hundreds of miles back in 1848. The border was designated too far south or not enough north. Excluding many Mexicans from wannabe be American citizenship as the SW territories flourished as part of the United States. Later many Mexicans crossed the border for jobs and a better life. Cancel culture history revionists want us to forget the conquest, Whites hate themselves for European colonization, focus on racism and hatred of American history promoting stolen lands. As you state, this happened everywhere, its standard. But Leftist political indoctrination is at the wheel, driving hatred to destroy the United States.
    7
  10. Your family were nomads from the far north who incidentally arrived in the SW about the time the Spanish did. If the European had not come, you'd still be at violent wars with the Navaho, Pueblo and other tribes, that's if the Comanche hadn't wiped you out as in genocide... Or you'd still be nomadic and who knows where you'd be, or you most likely wouldn't be...History goes a long, long , long way back and you're who and where you are because of historical events.
    7
  11.  @robiking011  Texas 15 years , New Mexico and California 25 years under Mexico hardly made the population Mexican except polically. The young Republic of Mexico had a problem with its citizens nationism. Those populations who were thousands of miles from the heart of Mexico were seeking Independence from Mexico or siding with the United States. So any Mexican patriotism waned after Mexican officials the US. They may have been Mexican citizens for a brief twenty years, but that changed after American citizenship. It's kinda like if China overtook Mexico, planted their flag and Constitution, then overnight you became Chinese. You would still be Mexican at heart. For the annexed territories population---300 yrs under Spain, 15 - 25 yrs Mexico, 170 yrs United States. 25 years under Mexico is hardly heartfelt, It was nothing but border issues.
    6
  12. Vinbainashe Mushayikwa It's really ridiculous to compare ownership of a home today, when there are laws and written title to ownership to an ancient world where the Indians had no concept of ownership or anything official, they just squatted wherever for X number of years till they were chased out by other Indians. The Indians were enemy to other tribes. The European was just a different warrior. Violence, squatting, slavery, genocide, cannabolizm, scalping etc were well known to the Indian before the European arrived. The only difference was disease. The facts are that enemy Indians allied with the European to defeat other tribes. It's something called the human condition which is short of ideal.
    6
  13.  @mfhouston3002  I never said killing was a privilege. The Trail of Tears is the past. And all United States citizens now have the same rights under the law. What I am saying is that compared to other Indians in the Americas, the United States tribes lands are now protected, they have sold lands, lands have been returned, have their own sovereign nations and Tribes get millions in federal funding annually to protect their interests from the great nation🇺🇸. Look at the Indians of Mexico who would gladly take your place as US Americans. Generally US Indians would not go back to living in a barbaric stone age world, it was the United States that freed you from a backward life which you are free if you wish to go back into your wilderness lands and live the life of the 15th century. No one is stopping you.
    6
  14. In the first place, the lands were claimed by tribes for centuries, Texas was claimed by France, lands were Spains for over 250 years, Texas Republic. And Mexico for barely 25 years. In fact, Mexico became a country only 200 years ago in 1824. Mexico did not inherit Spains lands, there was never a Treaty from Spain who did not recognize independence or surrender New Spain. The attempted Treaty of Cordoba was never signed by Spains monarch. The USA conquered Mexico, and Mexicans migrated illegally to USAs borders after the Mexican War and signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. In fact it was the USA westward movement that incentivized Mexicans migration north. Before the USA, Mexicans had no need for Texas, New Mexico or California which was just an uninhabitable barren wilderness with unconquered Indians ready to attack anyone not of their tribe... Unless within USA borders legally and mass forced illegal entry, it is an invasion... It was Americans who governed, beautified and developed California and the SW.
    6
  15. Who ever made up that quote was historically challenged. It was actually Mexico who crossed the borders on inherent lands of the Navaho, Comanche, Caddo, Kiowa, Piaut , Shasta, Chumash, Pueblo and other northern tribes in today's USA. The Comanche and Kiowa constantly fought the Sonorans and Sinaloans. Fierce warrior tribes who were feared in those villages in today's northern Mexico who's lands were left in shreds by northern tribes.... Truth is Mexico had only been a nation for 25 years before the Mexican War and Mexico claimed its lands under its Estados Unidos Mexicanos constitution of 1824. Spain never acknowledged Mexican independence and Spains King refused to sign the Treaty of Cordova so Spain never treatied any lands over to Mexico. In fact under Mexico's first 1814 Apatzingan constitution, California, New Mexico which included Arizona, Texas were not Mexico. Today Mexico is what is left after the USA returned half of Mexico by the Treaty of GH. So "Mexico" since its beginning had been neither here or there. Until both the USA and Mexico negotiated a border. So that quote you mention is pretty ridiculous...
    6
  16.  @dngdnf4862  Many USA Americans are metis, mixed French or Anglo with Indian, especially those with roots here since the 1600s. Although it was the Spanish who mixed the most and merged both cultures to a mestizo culture, especially in Mexico the mestizo culture is more prominent than other parts of Spanish American.
    6
  17.  @robiking011  Right, with Mexico's independence, and Constitution the nations citizens became Mexican, Estados Unidos Mexicanos.
    5
  18.  @michaelcerean1990  You have history turned around. Mexico did not steal land from the SW Indians. There was no Mexico until about in1821, Mexico emerged out of independence from Spain. The Apache, Navajo, Comanche, and Yaqui and other northern tribes did not recognize Mexico as a sovereign nation and were at battles with Mexico for 25 years until the end of the Mexican War 1848, and after that time under United States domain. The Mexican never conquered the SW tribes or ever able to control the Indians lands 1821-1848. Consequently Mexico never stole SW Indian lands, in fact these Indians still live in their indigenous lands and are part of United States sovereign tribes. Mexico would never have claimed the SW territory if had not gained independence from Spain, so borders are neither here or there. Spain had claimed CA, NM and TX for 300 years before Johnny come late Mexicans were ever in the far northern SW scene. The United States did not steal lands, in fact the United States conquered Mexico all of Mexico, to the extent of occupying Mexico City and part of the negotiations between Mexico and the United States was to give parts of Mexico back to Mexico and annex the northern territory to the United States for fifteen million dollars. With a peace Treaty between both nations.
    5
  19. ​ @torgab7284  Who really knows as there's no real proof. Even the age of the earth is speculation, from millions of years to only ten thousand.
    5
  20.  @Angeljesus422  Mexican is a citizenship, not a race or ethnicity. So, in 1824, the young Republic of Mexico claimed its citizens under Estados Unidos Mexicanos Constitution. The populations under New Spain were Peninsules/Español, Crillos, mestizo, indio, mulatto until Mexican independence, Mexican citizenship. 25 years does not make a Mexican. Texans from the Texas homeland were Spanish Colonial Settlers who came from the Canary Islands and Louisiana Texas border, became Mexican citizens under Mexican independence. Migrants from Chihuahua and Sinola who later made it to Texas borders areas after 1880 are of Mexican heritage and Mexican tribes.
    5
  21. Then those people have to give back the land who took land from others and those need to give back land going back centuries. All land was taken by stronger tribes.
    5
  22.  @youforeign3066  I agree, Puerto Rico has factions wanting to become an independent country, instead of becoming the 51st state. I totally agree with independence, not only because Spanish is their language, but Puerto Rico is a beautiful country with it's own heritage and culture.
    5
  23. Best country in the world. That's why migrants are flooding in.
    4
  24.  @TheBatugan77  Unless there had been no USA...lol
    4
  25.  @MarxinRios  Rubbish. Hitler inspired by America, is nonsense. Hitler was inspired by socialist communism. The US is the land of a free republic democracy. When/where did Jews hide in the US, where were the ovens, who were the communist dictators. In fact, it's the Socialist Indian reservations who are run by tribal dictorial systems, no personal ownership if not impoverished, totally dependent on the government. The United States is not perfect, but it's the best there is...
    4
  26. How could the United States have stole your country. The people who lived in California, Texas and New Mexico in 1848 --Californios, Tejanos, Nuevomexicanos still live in the land, had been there before Mexican independence and before the Mexican War, never left and are still there, be they descendants of early Spanish colonial settlers or Comanche, Ute, Shasta Piaute Caddo Mohave Chumash Pueblo Navajo and many other northern tribes. You're an outsider to the United States who's ancestors to begin with, were never en el Norte and nothing of el Norte belonged to you or was taken from you.
    4
  27. How about Mexico's cartels. What really is the difference between Mexico's cartels and Mexico's government.
    4
  28. @Kermit First of all, they did not identify as Native American, or was there an America. They were not a unified one people, even if other tribes were twenty miles away. They were nomads and had no concept of ownership. And there was alot of land that was not utilized.
    4
  29.  @dianadiaz2555  Back where, Mexicans were never in the United States to begin with. The lands belonged to tribes such as Apache, Navajo, Comanche, Ute, Kiowa and are still in the lands the European found them.
    4
  30.  SAMUEL JESSE  So what, borders have been changing forever. That 45% was quasi goverened by Mexico for a blink of the eye, barely 15 years Texas, 25 years California and New Mexico. Not historically Mexico. You would not even cry about lands conquered if they were still an undeveloped uninhabitable barren lands, with unconquered Indians the condition the United States found it.
    4
  31. It's left wing woke propaganda, and historically incorrect. And yes, US Americans need a SW history lesson. But not from this video.
    4
  32. The lands belonged to Spain for 300 years. Mexico was an 1800s Johnny come late. Spain had given up Florida, Louisiana by 1800 and was in the process of land granting Texas to America settlers. Spain had too much uncontrolled territory and barely financed California, New Mexico and Texas. Most likely Spain would have sold these lands if not for Mexican independence. Spain lost control of New Spain, todays central Mexico because of France invading Spain, Spain pulling all it's resources in Europe and losing America.
    4
  33. This is a bunch of Mexican pilosophy hogwash. To begin with back n 1519 when Cortez first stepped onto what is today American soil, , there was no Canada, United States or Mexico. It was a bunch of native tribes from Alaska to Argentina who were nowhere close to a united nation. Tribes don't even have a common diety within 300 miles.... Tribes were nomadic and happened to be where they were when the European arrived after centuries of displacing , if not killing off weaker tribes. Montezuma's kingdom was no further than Aztec country Tenochitlan. Cortez was seriously outnumbered, conquering Montezuma, strategically, using Montezuma's enemy tribe's to conquer Aztec tribes in their native Tenochitlan, better known as Mexico City for 500 years. In reality, tribes were violent enemies to one another within the local geography, committing slavery, rape, genocide, cannabolisn, scalping, piercing out human hearts for glory -- inhuman atrocities with their primitive weapons of destruction. Nations, borders and independence were made over two centuries later by European American colonist settlers following wars, negotiations, treaties, land disputes, purchases. Mexico is not winning anything on it's own. It's radical left wing, open borders United States politics allowing this since the 1980s with mass illegal migration. If the United States (corrupt) politicians followed the rule of law, muti-millions would still be in Mexico, where coward Mexicans do nothing for their country, instead flee to the foreign NORTH, the ingrates selfishly then wrongly claim the land was theirs. Corruption rules. Mexicans have been migrating to the north, United States, since a border was established after the Mexican War for not only economic reasons, but to escape a dictorial corrupt goverenment and 1910 Revolution. . As stated, they head to to el norte, not south. Land of the free🇺🇸 North is what the United States made and Mexicans would have no need for the foreign north without a United States or Gringo who made it, which they criticize yet the ingrates plump themselves with comfort after fleeing their impoverished homeland. What hypocracy. Mexicans are winning nothing, it's a destructive, upside down corrupt USA run by cartels in a no win situation except for the rich and powerful. It was Spains Casa's Laws of the Indies who promoted human rights for the natives. Mexico abolished slavery, the United States went to a Civil War to end slavery. But it is the United States who has given reparations to United States indigenous, has had a Bureau of Indian Affairs since the 1800s, has federal Indian Laws for the protection of US tribes who get ridiculous amounts of federal funding annually. Mexico has nothing for the natives who complain about their lands stolen by the Mexican gov. And United States Indians have no need for Mexicans, as U.S. California or SW Indian tribes never considered themselves Mexican or their indiginous lands Mexico.
    4
  34. Land is never stolen. Land is conquered. Mexico is no exception.
    4
  35. ​​ @damarindo  Spain did not recognize Mexican independence and Spains King refused to sign the Treaty of Cordova. Spain did not Treaty any lands over to Mexico. Mexico claimed its lands on paper, under its 1824 Estados Unidos Mexicanos constitution. One may consider stolen as Mexico Treaty'd lands over to the USA describing a border, lands and water's. There was no such description of lands under any agreement when Mexico took Spains lands. Under Mexico's first Apatzingan constitution, California, New Mexico/Arizona and Texas were not Mexico. So Mexico's borders changed 4 times within fourty years; from no border as there was no Mexico, then the lands under Apatzingan constitution, then the 1824 constitutional border, and the 1848 border. All in all from later 1800s California had its share of immigrants; Americans, Mexicans, Chinese, Japanese and Philippines up to earlier 1900s. And California had been settled by Americans early on during the SW Mexican Period which started in 1821. Mexican soldiers were given Mexican land grants during this Period to encourage settlers, they were few as California was very distant, isolated wilderness and conditions were as uninhabitable as during the Spanish Period, very difficult to settle with dangerous unconquered raiding Indians. Americans were the most population and built Californias infrastructure. Bottom line is Mexicans were not ancestrally rooted in California, they were late arrivals in the 1800s as were Anglo Americans. European Spain was the claimant, settler and founder of early California. It was the USA government who subjugated the Indians..
    4
  36.  @MarxinRios  you have no clue what a Nazi is. Enlighten yourself and look it up. Besides the natives were genocidal centuries before any European set foot on this continent. Tribes killed and displaced weaker tribes, they slaved, scalped, cannibalize, pierced out hearts for sport, they were viciously violent. Think before you speak. I call what Europeans did , era of exploration and CONQUEST. It was a violent world, the world standard in the 1600s. If the European had not come and quelled the Indians, they would still be at war, tribe against tribe...
    3
  37. USA wanted only today's SW which included Nevada, Utah, Colorado. Much of Territories were never Colonized by Spain and the warrior Indians were never conquered. Only the Pueblo tribes in central/ northern New Mexico were subjugated by Spaniards.
    3
  38. He's an indoctrinated liberal woke, alright...
    3
  39.  @princevimbai1  Yes, we cannot change the past. And need to not dwell on the negative, accept the past, not just selected portions. Revision history does not teach us unbiasedly, consequently we cannot learn or heal.
    3
  40.  @princevimbai1  I agree, hate, prejudice and not getting over injustices of the past just makes for angry neighbors and does no one any good. Life goes on, so it's best to make a better life for all in the community. Personally, I prefer to learn my history, and will stand up to it. That's my problem, people slanting historical events, to suit their wants. Nice conversation!
    3
  41.  @salvadorrosales8640  the US will become another banana republic corrupt to the point of no return by migrants who mock the rule of law to make their own. It will become another corrupt Mexico. Adios America, thank you US Socialist Communist American Democrat politicians who are throwing away freedom for open borders to ruin America. Without a border there is the fall of a great nation with no protection for it's citizens. So enjoy your banana republic along with papers. And your weak banana republic will surely crumble as it always has into the hands of great nations as China or Russian. You won't screw around with them crying over lost lands which were nothing but a barren wilderness frontier which Mexico claimed for barely 15-25 years, spent the fifteen million the US paid which was barely enough for MX to get out debt to never govern it's nation or citizens successfully as a western nation similar to the US, Canada. Truth is Mexicans feel cheated, not for annexed barren uninhabitable waste land in the far north territories Mexicans had no need for when Mexico gained independence, with thousands of unconquered Indians. Cheated rather because the border was too far north to include them in American life. Always looking north. Enjoy bumpy ride😀
    3
  42.  SAMUEL JESSE  Those lands in Texas were settled by Americans, not Mexicans, through legal land grants and Texas gained independence the good old fashioned way by a revolution and conquest. Mexico upon independence had nationistic problems with populations in territories it claimed in the far outside northern frontier wilderness and south of Mexico too. New Mexico and California were the first to be conquered by the US and many Spanish Colonial population sided with the US, let alone the unconquered Indians of the north were opposed to the new Republic and there were bitter wars between Johnny come late Mexicans and Apache, Navajo, Yaqui trespassing their inherent lands. New Mexico Spanish Colonists even sided with Comanche,, against the Mexican army. These Indians were never conquered by Mexico. Nevertheless the lands were legally conquered by the United States. Mexico is part of western nations showing it chose to model it's independence, constitution and political system after the United States, even it's name, Estados Unidos Mexicanos. It's citizens should have no problem with conquest, a legal treaty and purchase accepted in the Western world. Mexico in 1848 accepted these terms. The Treaty of G Hidalgo mentions nothing about stolen lands. Stolen lands is promoted by Mexican factions who have no respect for anything. The lands were never historically Mexican to begin with., 15 to 25 years is nothing out of almost 500 years. Borders shifted, lands changed hands by purchase or treaty's. Who even recalls France claimed Texas for ten years. After the US defeated the southwest Indians in the 1880s and settled Indian land issues, there were no Immigration laws, Mexicans migrated hundreds of miles to the US border areas, after Indian threats were pretty much over.
    3
  43.  SAMUEL JESSE  I know SW history, it has very little to do with Mexican history as Mexicans are Johnny come late to those 45% territory legally annexed United States. Furthermore California, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, Colorado, Nevada all those Indians on the 45% lands are not Mexican Indians. In fact they were vehemently opposed to Mexico's trespassing their lands and those closest to the border were ready to battle Mexico. Yes, read the books. They had no need for Mexicans during the SW Mexican Period, same stands today.
    3
  44.  SAMUEL JESSE  It's American history, whether you like it or not. Obviously when Cortez arrived in Vera Cruz, the Spanish did not say "this is Mexico" they were just territories of different enemy tribes with Indian names and not all were Aztec. There was no central government, no country, no Mexico, no Mexican no nothing to indicate a Mexico that extended to what were unknown lands 1500 miles to the north. What a coincidence that Spains discovered territories from north to south just happened to be an ancient Mexico. Just not so. Mexico is not even recognized in pre 1821 maps. The Indians were localized to their particular geography. And your concept doesn't have a leg to stand on, historically speaking. As I read back to your comments your historical accounts are upside-down as if you're going to the internet getting bits and pieces with no historical knowledge on your part. New Spain were Spains territories, parts of New Spain became Mexico which of course had belonged to Spain before 1821, this is basically what I've been saying.
    3
  45. Harris should learn history before presenting a nitwitted liberal version. Mexico lost the war, signed the treaty. End of story.
    3
  46. Sad indeed. These woke history revionists are oblivious to conquest. They have been indoctrinated to hate the US of A, twist history but refuse to leave, hummm, to a better country. Why, because their utopia never did exist, then or now.
    3
  47. Did God forget Mexicos sinful corruption both the government and cartels, and Mexican people who illegally abuse the USA and leave their children abandoned like a puppy dog to flee Mexico or leave at the hands of corrupt stangers in the barren desert. Not to mention Mexicans coveting that which belongs to the US neighbor for themselves.... Thats not the gospel.... Does God not hear daily every other disgusting cuss word coming out of a Mexicans dirty mouth... Take back what, the lands belonged to the Navaho, Apache, Ute, Pueblo, Comanche, Piaut, Shasta, Mohave, Chumash plus hundreds of tribes and still belong to them, sovereign lands within the USA. While Mexicos abusive government stole the native lands and is still at it... Get real, a super power Iike China with a powerful military conquered by a small corrupt Latin nation who never could put itself together. Dream on lol...
    3
  48.  @nb1223  Right, time changes as in United States conquest of Mexico which many Mexicans cannot let go of and want to "take back" a lie on stolen lands. War and conquest is part of world history since time began. Thats how Mexico became nation in 1821. Took the lands from Spain. Accept the Mexican War world event, the loss, change, the border. You lost nothing, the lands were not historically Mexico to begin with. Back in 1846 Mexico was a young nation who could barely manage Mexico City much less hold on and never had control the far off wilderness north which had been Spains lands. Mexico claimed California, New Mexico/Arizona, for barely 25 years, Texas 15 years. Learn the history instead of making it up. Mexicans are not God's people. Sorry, your theory is filled with false hope and too many holes. The gospel, nonsense. God will take care of the world's sinful evils at the appointed time, including Mexico.
    3
  49.  @grim5851  not stolen, conquered. Conquest, a human practice since the beginning of time.
    3
  50.  @eliseomartinez7911  Right. Mexico represents all native countries is total none sense. Mexico 1824 took the lands from irs indigenous and is still at it, while it's great neighbor, the United States since the 1800s set up the bureau of Indian Affairs, has given lands back to the tribes, they are sovereign nations, federal Indian Laws protect their interests and tribes get ridiculous amounts of federal dollars annually. In what is today the United States SW, Spain allowed the conquered tribes self goverance and Spanish land grants recognized by federal laws today.
    3