Comments by "Kat 1515" (@Kat-fq4ei) on "Johnny Harris" channel.

  1. 37
  2. 19
  3. 15
  4. Did the movie explain that California and all the SW were under Mexico's rule for only 25 years, known as the SW Mexican Period. That's about the extent of "was once Mexico"... There was no Mexico or Mexican before 1824. California, Texas and New Mexico got their names from Spain starting in 1550 to become territories of New Spain through Spains explorations by land and sea. "California" was a mythological tale in Spain extended to the New World. Texas was named after Louisiana Caddo tribes. California and New Mexico extended to Nevada, Utah, Colorado, Arizona lands all claimed by Spain. What are today NM, TX, CA were colonized by Spain. Towns like Santa Fe, Taos (Don Fernando), Albuquerque, Socorro, El Paso, San Antonio, Nachotiches, San Diego, San Francisco, Monte Rey were early Spanish Colonial settlements 1598-1770 of the Spanish Colonial Period of 250 years up to 1821. Nevada, Utah, Colorado were not colonized during the Spanish Period. The Amerindians were northern tribes as Shasta, Chumash, Mohave, Piaute, Shoshone, Ute, Pueblo, Comanche, Caddo, Kiowa, Navajo, Apache Pawnee and many more. Mexico/Mexican were late arrivals to the SW after 1824. It was Mexican officials who transplanted north after Mexican independence 1821-1848 Mexican Period. Generally Mexicans didn't migrate north until post Mexican War years approx 1880, after USA westward movement, and after the US government quelled the thousands of unconquered tribes in the SW, and placing in reservations. Mexicans established towns in CA, NM, TX border areas. Americans, settlEd in CA and NM 1821; and TX shortly after, with Mexican issued land grant settlements as Texas was vast unpopulated lands and Mexico needed settlers. Trains, the 1910 Mexican Revolution brought more Mexicans. Americans built the SW, Americans influenced the SW as well as Mexican and Chinese in California. Mexicans were deported in the 1950s. There were not a high percent of Mexicans in California until the turn of the 21st century with uncontrolled illegal migration. Mexicans are immigrants to the USA and do not share an indigenous tribal heritage to northern tribes who are not Mexican. And Mexicans ancestors are not rooted in California, New Mexico or Texas. No parts of the SW are ancestrally Mexico. I didn't see the Hollywood movie, but sure it didn't go into SW history. My guess is its an immigrants story...
    13
  5. 11
  6. 11
  7. 10
  8. 9
  9. 7
  10. 7
  11. 6
  12. 6
  13. 6
  14. 6
  15. 6
  16. 6
  17. 5
  18. 5
  19. 5
  20. 5
  21. 5
  22. 5
  23. 4
  24. 4
  25. 4
  26. 4
  27. 4
  28. 4
  29. 4
  30. 4
  31. 4
  32. 4
  33. This is a bunch of Mexican pilosophy hogwash. To begin with back n 1519 when Cortez first stepped onto what is today American soil, , there was no Canada, United States or Mexico. It was a bunch of native tribes from Alaska to Argentina who were nowhere close to a united nation. Tribes don't even have a common diety within 300 miles.... Tribes were nomadic and happened to be where they were when the European arrived after centuries of displacing , if not killing off weaker tribes. Montezuma's kingdom was no further than Aztec country Tenochitlan. Cortez was seriously outnumbered, conquering Montezuma, strategically, using Montezuma's enemy tribe's to conquer Aztec tribes in their native Tenochitlan, better known as Mexico City for 500 years. In reality, tribes were violent enemies to one another within the local geography, committing slavery, rape, genocide, cannabolisn, scalping, piercing out human hearts for glory -- inhuman atrocities with their primitive weapons of destruction. Nations, borders and independence were made over two centuries later by European American colonist settlers following wars, negotiations, treaties, land disputes, purchases. Mexico is not winning anything on it's own. It's radical left wing, open borders United States politics allowing this since the 1980s with mass illegal migration. If the United States (corrupt) politicians followed the rule of law, muti-millions would still be in Mexico, where coward Mexicans do nothing for their country, instead flee to the foreign NORTH, the ingrates selfishly then wrongly claim the land was theirs. Corruption rules. Mexicans have been migrating to the north, United States, since a border was established after the Mexican War for not only economic reasons, but to escape a dictorial corrupt goverenment and 1910 Revolution. . As stated, they head to to el norte, not south. Land of the free🇺🇸 North is what the United States made and Mexicans would have no need for the foreign north without a United States or Gringo who made it, which they criticize yet the ingrates plump themselves with comfort after fleeing their impoverished homeland. What hypocracy. Mexicans are winning nothing, it's a destructive, upside down corrupt USA run by cartels in a no win situation except for the rich and powerful. It was Spains Casa's Laws of the Indies who promoted human rights for the natives. Mexico abolished slavery, the United States went to a Civil War to end slavery. But it is the United States who has given reparations to United States indigenous, has had a Bureau of Indian Affairs since the 1800s, has federal Indian Laws for the protection of US tribes who get ridiculous amounts of federal funding annually. Mexico has nothing for the natives who complain about their lands stolen by the Mexican gov. And United States Indians have no need for Mexicans, as U.S. California or SW Indian tribes never considered themselves Mexican or their indiginous lands Mexico.
    4
  34. 4
  35. ​​ @damarindo  Spain did not recognize Mexican independence and Spains King refused to sign the Treaty of Cordova. Spain did not Treaty any lands over to Mexico. Mexico claimed its lands on paper, under its 1824 Estados Unidos Mexicanos constitution. One may consider stolen as Mexico Treaty'd lands over to the USA describing a border, lands and water's. There was no such description of lands under any agreement when Mexico took Spains lands. Under Mexico's first Apatzingan constitution, California, New Mexico/Arizona and Texas were not Mexico. So Mexico's borders changed 4 times within fourty years; from no border as there was no Mexico, then the lands under Apatzingan constitution, then the 1824 constitutional border, and the 1848 border. All in all from later 1800s California had its share of immigrants; Americans, Mexicans, Chinese, Japanese and Philippines up to earlier 1900s. And California had been settled by Americans early on during the SW Mexican Period which started in 1821. Mexican soldiers were given Mexican land grants during this Period to encourage settlers, they were few as California was very distant, isolated wilderness and conditions were as uninhabitable as during the Spanish Period, very difficult to settle with dangerous unconquered raiding Indians. Americans were the most population and built Californias infrastructure. Bottom line is Mexicans were not ancestrally rooted in California, they were late arrivals in the 1800s as were Anglo Americans. European Spain was the claimant, settler and founder of early California. It was the USA government who subjugated the Indians..
    4
  36. 3
  37. 3
  38. 3
  39. 3
  40. 3
  41. 3
  42.  SAMUEL JESSE  Those lands in Texas were settled by Americans, not Mexicans, through legal land grants and Texas gained independence the good old fashioned way by a revolution and conquest. Mexico upon independence had nationistic problems with populations in territories it claimed in the far outside northern frontier wilderness and south of Mexico too. New Mexico and California were the first to be conquered by the US and many Spanish Colonial population sided with the US, let alone the unconquered Indians of the north were opposed to the new Republic and there were bitter wars between Johnny come late Mexicans and Apache, Navajo, Yaqui trespassing their inherent lands. New Mexico Spanish Colonists even sided with Comanche,, against the Mexican army. These Indians were never conquered by Mexico. Nevertheless the lands were legally conquered by the United States. Mexico is part of western nations showing it chose to model it's independence, constitution and political system after the United States, even it's name, Estados Unidos Mexicanos. It's citizens should have no problem with conquest, a legal treaty and purchase accepted in the Western world. Mexico in 1848 accepted these terms. The Treaty of G Hidalgo mentions nothing about stolen lands. Stolen lands is promoted by Mexican factions who have no respect for anything. The lands were never historically Mexican to begin with., 15 to 25 years is nothing out of almost 500 years. Borders shifted, lands changed hands by purchase or treaty's. Who even recalls France claimed Texas for ten years. After the US defeated the southwest Indians in the 1880s and settled Indian land issues, there were no Immigration laws, Mexicans migrated hundreds of miles to the US border areas, after Indian threats were pretty much over.
    3
  43. 3
  44. 3
  45. 3
  46. 3
  47. 3
  48. 3
  49. 3
  50. 3