Comments by "" (@Crashed131963) on "Whatifalthist" channel.

  1. FOR SALE Italian army rifle good condition. Never fired and only dropped once.
    1
  2. Russia has so many nukes it does not even need a large military or population and would b suicidal for any country to invade. Same with Europe ,India and America.
    1
  3. We would be on WW4 by now if it was not for nukes.
    1
  4. Korea , Iraq .
    1
  5. Japan was a no issue http://www.combinedfleet.com/economic.htm The US had 3 aircraft carries in 1942 midway. In 3 short years they built 30 more aircraft carries something Japan and Germany could never do. The US resources and manufacturing capacity was 4 times that of Germany and they had twice Germanys population.  Then their is the 4 year monopoly of the A-Bomb.
    1
  6. Visit a `No Go Zone` and see how peaceful Sweden is.
    1
  7. Japan would have gave Australia back once the US A-Bombed Japan to surrender in 1945.
    1
  8. http://www.combinedfleet.com/economic.htm  Japan would have had to give Australia back once they surrendered to the US after the Nakaski bombing .
    1
  9. I missed how the Germans got by the royal navy to land on Britain. The Battle of Britain was over England so shoot down pilots of the RAF would fly again while Germans would be POWs. Germany making more planes would not help they would run out of pilots.
    1
  10. That's only 9 years from now. There are car warranties that long now.
    1
  11. Numerical Advantage?? Quit living like the next war would be like WW2. Populations no longer matters in war. One Ohio Class sub can take out China with a crew of 150. If Iceland had enough ICBMs it could take out any country.
    1
  12. ICBMs H-Bomb warheads coming down from orbit will not care what the navies are doing and who is allied with who. WW3 will be over in hours with no winning side.
    1
  13.  @Kirin2022  I watch a great video on how ICBMs work and what they can destroy. They do not mention anything happening on the ground or Oceans interfering with their operation once launched.
    1
  14.  @Robert53area  Land forces mean nothing when the other side has control of the air and A-Bombs. From France and northern Italy the B-29 could reach moscow. Britain and the US lost a million troops combined while Russia lost 11 million. Britain France and the US would have beat them in the manpower count .
    1
  15.  @daniellee8162  It took multiple raids with hundreds of heavy bomber to turn a city into rubble. One Bomb on plane and a 8 minute bomb drop is no way the same devastation Japan would have went through. Hiding in jungles and caves would not even help if a A-Bomb is dropped in the area. Nukes is a different league of bombing , then you have the radiation.
    1
  16.  @koiboi1562  Here is the A-Bomb production schedule for 1945 http://www.dannen.com/decision/bomb-rate.html If Japan did not surrender 5 cities a mouth could have been nuked.
    1
  17.  @koiboi1562  I ment even without Nukes the US would have just conventional bombed for a year from nearby Okinawa over defenceless Japan before trying a costly land invasion.
    1
  18.  @koiboi1562  It gets even worse for Japan. With Germany out of the war the huge RAF bomber command and the US 8th air force would be transferred to Okinawa where even the B-17s and Lancasters could bomb anything of the south half of Japan. Without even needing fighter escort. Here was the grim numbers http://www.combinedfleet.com/economic.htm Poor Japan.
    1
  19.  @qualityshitposter9314  After a Nuclear exchange between Russia and the USA India can have the destroyed radioactive planet all to itself.
    1
  20. The US built 30 more carries after Midway in 3 short years. The US losing the Battle of Midway was not going to change Japans outcome.
    1
  21. Nukes put a stop to large wars.
    1
  22. ICBMs H-Bomb warheads coming down from orbit will not care whos allies with who.
    1
  23. I like it but for one thing about the U-Boats starving Britain By 1943 The British developed Radar and Sonar to the point it was suicidal to be in a U-Boat. They were even sinking U-Boats at night from the air. Canada had the 4th largest navy during ww2 to help.
    1
  24. Than the US would be the largest country in land mass not Russia. Canada would have more and cheaper cell service plans.
    1
  25. Putin likes China not the Russian people.
    1
  26. Many Japan would not have surrendered after two A-Bombs but after 6 ,7 ,or 10 A-Bombs you have to admit eventually they would have surrendered.
    1
  27. The US would A-Bomb Japan until I surrendered . So basically no change in plans.
    1
  28.  @독자적인이름  Because Russia is a nuclear armed country , nobody can take land from Russia by force even if they do not use it.
    1
  29. Seems like Merkel still agrees.
    1
  30. Pretty hard for a factory to matter when the city its located in is vaporized under a radioactive mushroom cloud.
    1
  31. The  Germanys smart scientist  fled Germany. Germany did not have the resources of the US to build the bomb first.
    1
  32. If you look at these charts http://www.combinedfleet.com/economic.htm Japan with 100% of Americas attention with no "Germany First" could have won a lot quicker and with no A-Bomb. They could have beat 5 Japans even if they lost at Midway.
    1
  33. I missed how the Germans got by the royal navy to land on Britain.
    1
  34. The States and Canada would be one country. Canada is Independed of Britain since 1867 and without a war over it.
    1
  35. China's GDP per capita is below Botswana Africa. https://www.worldometers.info/gdp/gdp-per-capita/ China is a billion working poor.
    1
  36. Then the stuff we buy would cost a lot more because only communist Chiness would build TVs and I-Phones for 5 cents a hour.
    1
  37. True India has 68% living in poverty That's 700 million people.
    1
  38. Sweden is a peaceful muslim country today.
    1
  39. How? The water flows north not south.
    1
  40.  @ankitsd7474  Exactly , that's why we have not had a big war since 1945.
    1