General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Eastory
comments
Comments by "" (@Crashed131963) on "Eastory" channel.
Previous
1
Next
...
All
Finland just wanted their lost land back from the 1938 winter war with Russia. Finland got off lucky at the end of the war and was not taken completely over by Stalin like Eastern Europe in the end.
193
@lesliefranklin1870 OOOPs , thanks.
38
@malter87 Also I think D-Day was held back as long as possible to let Germany and Russia kill each other. D-Day was about getting to Germany before Russia took the whole county and some of western Europe like they did with eastern Europe. The US was never in Danger from Germany , so why loses millions over a country that never attack you like Japan.
8
True By late 1943 the Russians were on a unstoppable march to Berlin no matter what. D-Day prevented France from being a future Warsaw Pact member.
5
Why would Russia want even more land?
4
I know it's so out dated that it's hard to believe they were in charge just 100 years ago.
4
By late 1943 the Russians were on a unstoppable march to Berlin no matter what. D-Day prevented France from being a future Warsaw Pact member.
3
Hitler declared war on the US first.
3
@speedzero7478 Because that's where the land fighting was. D-Day was to make sure Russia did not liberate France and stay like in Poland.
3
In a war of attrition numbers beat skill. The US alone had 40 million more people and a manufacturing capacity 3 times that Germany. It did not matter what Germany did , they were outnumbered in everything.
3
We let the Nazi and Communist kill each other for as long as possible before launching D-Day in 1944. Plan worked. 6 million Nazi troops killed ,10 million Red Army killed. The US and Britain lost 500 thousand each. That's how you fight a war.
2
Dod o Fact remains that 80% of the fighting was the German Russian eastern front.
2
Germany was a country of 70 million in 1940. They were fighting the USA , USSR and UK all at once. How else could the war turn out? The US alone had 40 million more people and a manufacturing capacity 3 times that Germany. It did not matter what they did , they were outnumbered in everything.
2
And the Russians had to build a wall to keep the Happy Germans in communist east Germany. In 1990 the East Germans had a party when the USSR fell with the DDR .
2
Between the Clintons and the Bushs I thought the US was going to be run buy only families. 320 million people and they only get their leaders from two Families.
2
True Especially if your a sports fan like me who goes to stadiums and realized what 80,000 people really looks like at a glance.
2
Germany was a country of only 70 million in 1940 , while The USSR was 160 million fighting on one front not two like Germany. Stalin Just pulled more people out of the Gulags if he needed more.
2
@diegogaliano8417 To be fair the Germans needed a lot of people on the west before 1944 . They had to Guard the coast from France to Norway and police those countries , they had to man Thousands of AA Guns. They Allies were coming up Italy and they sure needed lot of firefighters from every city being bombed day and night.
2
By late 1943 the Russians were on a unstoppable march to Berlin no matter what. D-Day prevented France from being a future Warsaw Pact member.
2
The US could out produce Germany and Russia combined. The US Navy like today was larger than the rest of the world navies combined. We people in North America were never in a threat of being invaded . Life in Europe would have change not so much in America.
1
@kevinfoo8031 True . How could a small country of 70 million like Germany even occupy all of Europe and Russia? Even Russia had to let Eastern Europe go in 1990 because it was just to much.
1
The France plan was brilliant. Surrender with no damaged cities , have bread and wine under the Eiffel Tower and wait for D-Day to come and bail them out.
1
MemeLover Here is a enlightening short read with charts. http://www.combinedfleet.com/economic.htm The US alone had twice Germany's population 3 times their manufacturing capacity and 4 times their natural resources. On paper the US could have fought two Germanys. The US was in its own category during WW2.
1
Look more like you need more people on your side. 70 million person Germany was not beating 120 million USA , 56 million Britain and 160 million USSR. While needing troops to just occupy and Police the countries Germany already took over.
1
The Finns were trying to get their lost land back the Russians took in 1938 Winter War and never went further. Stalin or Hitler is not much of a difference.
1
True . A country of 70 million should not try to take over Europe , Russia and fight North America all at the same time.
1
It not hindsight to know you can not fight the USA , UK and USSR at once. Even with Russia out of the war somehow Germany was heavily outnumbered in everything.
1
@bennyandersen742 The US alone had twice Germany's population and 3 times it's manufacturing capacity. Than the UK with Canada ,Australia ,New Zealand and India sending manpower and resources. Occupying Russia alone would hold back a million troops. They needed 500,000 German just to police Norway and Denmark. Then along comes the B-29 and A-bomb in 1945 right on schedule.
1
When you occupy and country you invaded it takes a lot of troops to police the new territory. Did you think the Germans were welcome with open arms in France,Denmark ,Belgium ,Norway and Holland?
1
Japan still even bothered with China by 1945 when the US had mainland Japan in a air and sea blockade stranglehold. Nothing in China matter at this point for them.
1
Steiner lost WW2.
1
The US was the only country that came out of the war richer than it did going into the war. Russia came out militarily stronger but exhausted with a wasteland of war torn country sides and burned out cities and 24 million dead. Britain was completely bankrupt , its last ww2 payment to the US was in Dec 2006. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk/6215847.stm WW2 ended the US depression of the 1930s , so they did OK in WW2.
1
I think Stalin killed more Russians than the Germans did.
1
No country of only 70 million is beating the US let alone with the UK and USSR. The US can produce ships faster than Germany could make torpedoes. WW2 was a war of Math (Attrition).
1
Even without the USA Britain had control of the seas and colonies like Canada, Australia ,New Zealand and India to get manpower and resources from. Unlike WW2 France WW1 France was no pushover.
1
Germany was a country of only 70 million in 1940 , while The USSR was 160 million fighting on one front not two like Germany. Stalin just had to pull people out of the Gulags if he needed more troops.
1
They were outnumbered in everything. No county is beating the USSR, UK and USA all at once.
1
Great videos.
1
True. The British without America was not ever invading Europe. But the invading Russia part may have still happened and blew up in Germany's face.
1
@manilajohn0182 That's sad that all of Europe in not self sustainable and it still requires invading Russia for resources. That was America's advantage their country has every resource within it to wage long wars without import resources.
1
@manilajohn0182 With Nukes and a WW3 being over in a few hours without a winner , big wars are a thing of the past. We have conflicts now.
1
How would they know what Putin's support really is in Russian. You think a Russian would say they do not support Hitler 2.0 in a Russian Poll?
1
Well yes , they were fighting for Russia. The Germans were not sailing to America or Britain at anytime.
1
@ДмитроПрищепа-д3я After The Great Stalin Made Famine of 1932–1933 in Ukraine (Holodomor), took from 7 million to 10 million innocent lives, the Germans would have had allies if they played it smarter.
1
When did France officially "Un-Surrender" ?
1
In the US we always knew Germany was never sailing over and taking over North America. Russia beat the Germans we just made sure Russia did not keep going , and take all west Europe like east Europe.
1
Germany was a country of only 70 million in 1940 , while The USSR was 160 million fighting on one front not two like Germany. Stalin just had to pull people out of the Gulags if he needed more troops.
1
Germany was a country of only 70 million in 1940 , while The USSR was 160 million fighting on one front not two like Germany. Stalin just had to pull people out of the Gulags if he needed more troops.
1
@Loreless You have to Guard occupied countries they do not fight for you. If anything German lost a lot of manpower having to Police their conquered nations. With that thinking Britain has 600 million people in India.
1
Same thing as ww2 for Germany. You can not fight three industrialized 1st world countries at once on your own.
1
Previous
1
Next
...
All