General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
TIKhistory
comments
Comments by "" (@Crashed131963) on "TIKhistory" channel.
Previous
2
Next
...
All
@farinatty The Bren was Light machine gun to support a group rather than a soldier's personal weapon. It needed a two leg stands in most cases.
1
@ВячеславСкопюк Your right about the M1 and Fg 42 , and SVT-40 ,me bad. But the AVT used a lower powered short 7.62mm x 39mm or 7.62x41mm not a true 7.62x54mm round. Like the German StG 44 that used a in between 7.9x33mm round stronger than a pistol round but less than a true rifle round.
1
People do not realize Germany was a small country of 70 million in 1940.The US alone had twice their manpower and 3 times their manufacturing capacity.
1
@nkristianschmidt Maybe for the Ukraine ,but France , Norway and Poland would never be cooperative. Occupying a country takes up manpower it does not create it.
1
But that would give Russia time to build up as well and they had more people and Resources.
1
They hosted the 1936 Olympics to the world . How did they hide that Germany had no food?
1
If Germany had all the fuel they ever needed they were lost. You can not fight the USSR,UK and USA all at once. The US (Alone) had twice Germany's population and 4 times their manufacturing capacity. Final nail is the Manhattan Project was going to be completed no matter what. What is fascinating is how long Germany lasted though.
1
Even without nukes the US had twice Germany's population and 4 times it's manufacturing capacity. Britain's anti sub tech (sonar ,Radar) came fast and britain would have never been blockaded by sea from supplies.
1
@alphax4785 OK say the US stayed out. Britain still had a much larger Navy than Germany and there was nothing Canada (UK Member) could not supply Britain with in Raw material and natural resources from nearby Halifax harbour.. It would have been a long statemate. Germany can not get to Britain and Britain could not get back on Europe.
1
It's a was a country of living in fear. Like North Korea and China today.
1
The US on two Fronts? You mean the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans were at war with the US?The US navy and Air Force was larger than the rest of the world's navies and Air Forces combined. No country was even close to North America let alone land on it.
1
Maybe. Stalin knew the allies were holding of a landing as long as possible to let both Germany and Russia bleed each other white for as long as possible ,which they did .June 1944 was very late into the war.
1
Yawn. The head north and are stopped dead by the Germans at the alps until the war ends.
1
No matter after Stalin's Order No. 270 any Russian POW after the war were sent to the gulags anyways.
1
@oscartang4587u3 Your right about those jobs. You sure do not want Russian POW welding U-Boat hulls though.
1
Germany had a population of only 70 million and was fighting a war on 3 fronts. The Russians had a population of 170 million fighting on one front. The Russian lost 1.3 million troops in encirclement t early in the war yet it did not effect them. Germany lost 250,000 Troops in Stalingrad and never recovered. That's call manpower and it's very important in wars of attritions.
1
Problem was even what the Germans occupied they has partisans tying up their troops. Germany did not have the population to enforce a occupation of Russia and Europe if they did some how take it all.
1
Also they did not build enough trucks even if they had the fuel.
1
If Germany had all the oil they wanted they still did not have the population and manufacturing capacity of it's enemies. The US alone could out produce 3 Germanys and had twice their population. Germany went to war agaims to many strong countries , math beat Germany.
1
HistoryMan Here is some good production charts and facts. http://www.combinedfleet.com/economic.htm The US was just in a complete category of its own in WW2. The two best examples are building 98,000 planes in one year ,it would have been higher if the US only built small planes like Germany. At 1942 Midway they had 3 large Carriers ,3 years later they had 32 large fleet Carriers. All this while having the 2 billion dollar Manhattan Project in operation. No other nation could do that stuff in WW2.
1
Germany was a nation of only 70 million people. USSR was 160 million the US was 120 million and Britain was 56 million. If no other country fought Germany they were going to lose the long game no matter what.
1
@TKUA11 True . Even the occupied countries like Norway, France and Poland held back a lot of German soldiers to police them.
1
Mine was General Winter.
1
Britain last war debt payment was Dec of 2006. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk/6215847.stm
1
@georgedimakopoulos8114 The US built up faster than that . Here is a good short read with charts http://www.combinedfleet.com/economic.htm 5 Japans were not beating the US. Even if Germany took Russia and Europe that hinders their manpower , you need large amount of forces to occupy hostile countries. The German had large amount of soldiers policing the Ukraine and Norway., let alone all of Europe and France and the Middle East. A country with only 70 million people just can not take over the world , the math just does not work does not work.
1
Arm 5 million POWs , what can go wrong?
1
If Germany had all the oil they wanted they still did not have the population and manufacturing capacity of it's enemies. The US alone could out produce 3 Germanys and had twice their population. Germany went to war agaims to many strong countries , math beat Germany.
1
The British mobilized 5 million service people during the war , the loss of 200,000 would be bad but in the Grand scheme of things not devisating. The Germans lost that many in Stalingrad yet fough a bigger battle at Kursk months later.
1
If your right about Stalin Invading Germany than all that would have changed is Hitler would be on our side not Stalin. NOWAY , Britain,France and the USA would let a communist regime exist in Western Europe , unlike Eastern Europe. Germany was no France they could hold off a Russian advance long enough for Britain and France to get their act together as American supplies pour over the atlantic with Russia's non existent navy not hindering convoys.
1
I thought everyone was driving 1955 Chevys to the drive ins and listening to Elvis Presley. Good times.
1
Population of Germany in 1940 was 70 million. Population of the USSR in 1940 was 160 million. Stalin had more people alright.
1
@artiombeknazaryan7542 Actually going back to rearm is smarter than (Trying) ramming. The Russian were not smart fighters. The Russians lost 5 million more soldiers than the losing side after the war.
1
He invaded east Poland with his ally Hitler.
1
Even with all the oil Germany wanted 70 million people Germany was not beating the 130 million people US and 60 million people UK even if Russia surrendered. The US had almost twice Germany's population and 4 times it's manufacturing capacity.
1
@kingorange7739 Then comes the Manhattan Project which would not care how good the Germans were doing or not. It was just a total loss for Germany no matter what.
1
@kingorange7739 All the top German and European Nuclear scientist were Jews and fled to America to work on the Project.
1
The Russian advantage was they had more soldiers than the Germans had bullets.
1
MemeLover In 1940 Germany had a population of 70 million (80 million today) and the USSR had 160 million , who could call on more replacement soldiers?
1
Even with all the oil in the world , Germany a country of only 70 million people was not beating the US, UK and Russia all at once. The US alone had twice Germany's population and 4 times its manufacturing capacity.
1
I think Fighting the USSR, USA and UK all at the same time beat the Germans. Warm weather and all the oil in the world was not changing the results of that math.
1
Operation Winter Storm got to 30 miles of the 6th army why not break out? Why have a Operation Winter Storm going on if the other end is not trying to mean their rescuer part way? What's to lose , zero people of the 6th army made it out ,so even 100,000 weaken solders on a small point of the Russia line may of had some get through rather than zero getting through by not trying.
1
@3ddevelopment979 Italy was more of a henderace for Germany. Even before Italy surrendered I think more italians had relatives in the US and were cheering for the other side. Germany had to bail Italy out of Africa and Greece holding back the Russian invasion Forces for two months.
1
Basically Germany was fighting 5 other Germanys when you add the man power and resources of the US ,UK and Russia.
1
Not even sure if beating Russia would have helped. The US alone had twice Germany's population and almost 4 times its manufacturing capacity. Then you add the UK nations which was close to on par with Germany. People do not realized Germany was a small country of 70 million in 1940, the talk about Germany taking over the world just sounds so silly today.
1
@Jameson-d8x Do you know the man power required to occupy and Police Europe and Russia? Germany would not have much left to expand. Occupation is expensive , like Russia found out in 1990 with the Warsaw pact.
1
http://www.combinedfleet.com/economic.htm The US did not take long to get rolling and once rolling no country was in their league. No outside events was stopping the development of the A-Bomb in 1945.
1
They called the Panther a medium tank . How can the PZ3 also be a medium tank? The Sherman was medium tank and it was the size of a PZ4.
1
What the Movie "DownFall" the reason Germany lost was because of Steiner!
1
True. Basically Germany was fighting 5 other Germanys when you add up the man power and resources of the US ,UK and Russia.No amount of oil was going to save Germany.
1
@jarl8815 Sweden was lucky the allies let them be after the war let alone Sweden was invading ANY country.
1
Previous
2
Next
...
All