Comments by "Ayodeji Olowokere" (@ayodejiolowokere1076) on "Monsieur Z" channel.

  1. @mikefish8226  rage some more, boy.
    1
  2. @mikefish8226  even if that's true how does that change the fact it is wealthier now? All that means is under European rule it was as poor as South Korea was in the aftermath of WWII.
    1
  3. @mikefish8226  just imagine how incompetent the European rulers were to have countries even worse off than Africa today. But you really have no arguments so I'd stick with insults.
    1
  4.  @mikefish8226  you've stated that because South Korea is wealthier as a ratio compared to Zimbabwe than it was in the 60s, it should be ignored than Zimbabwe is wealthier than Southern Rhodesia ever was on a pound for pound basis. Completely ignoring the UK and US' gap with South Korea have similarly shrunk.
    1
  5.  @mikefish8226  nah. You project often. The question is if you're aware. Common sense and you don't mix.
    1
  6. @mikefish8226  you fully understand arbitrarily comparing one economy's growth to another's is not a gauge for whether or not that economy is growing. You fully understand everything I'm saying.
    1
  7. @mikefish8226  yet Africa is far more developed than when Europeans controlled it. And continues to grow despite the mess they left.
    1
  8. @mikefish8226  I do and so do you.
    1
  9. @mikefish8226  hahahaha. Oh boy. No more faux arguments? Just straight insults now?
    1
  10.  @cupwasneverhere  who in the world would want to be ruled by foreigners? Would you want to ruled by Russians?
    1
  11.  @grailness1085  respectable to the lowest of the low and restored to its rightful masters.
    1
  12.  @grailness1085  it wasn't. Per capita income, urbanization, infant mortality, literacy. Everything is better today.
    1
  13.  @grailness1085  of course, I realize you only support it because you're of the same stock as it's colonizers. But let's keep pretending otherwise.
    1
  14.  @grailness1085  of course, the real reason you support them is obvious. But let's pretend otherwise.
    1
  15.  @grailness1085  oh please.
    1
  16. ​ @JStryker7 rubbish. The number of literate blacks outnumbered the entirety of whites.
    1
  17.  @JStryker7  so there weren't even 250 000 literate blacks in Rhodesia?
    1
  18.  @JStryker7  Zimbabwe literacy rate for 1992 was 83.51%, a 5.72% increase from 1982. This is Macrotrends.
    1
  19. ​ @maddoxlacy9072  why not leave them alone?
    1
  20.  @maddoxlacy9072  you're silly.
    1
  21. ​ @whyismyricewet1986  find help before too much time passes.
    1
  22.  @whyismyricewet1986  as one could expect.
    1
  23.  @whyismyricewet1986  can you think of another stupid thing to say?
    1
  24.  @RudolfStern3399  guess that makes you an honest scumbag. Scumbag or not, I can respect honesty and consistency.
    1
  25.  @whyismyricewet1986  that's part of my point, isn't it?
    1
  26.  @RudolfStern3399  yeah so those reverse colonists you're so critical of, have Europe as their homeland? Interesting how unremarkable you characters always turn out to be. Boundless and unyielding hypocrisy.
    1
  27.  @gch8810  there's that stupidity again. There was no one dimension to sub Saharan Africa. It's like saying Europe was a crappy place before the Industrial Revolution. Based on what standards?
    1
  28.  @matejamartin2199  seems like I struck a chord.
    1
  29.  @matejamartin2199  your comment remains incoherent though.
    1
  30.  @chiefslinginbeef3641  yes.
    1
  31. @johanbarnard3435  all these countries are more developed than they were upon decolonization. Your claim is nonsense.
    1
  32. @KeynanMatamalaDeBrito  compare per capita incomes in Africa from the 60s to today.
    1
  33.  @warlord733  You'd be surprised. Southern Rhodesia was poorer.
    1
  34. Ehh. Zimbabweans are better off today than in Rhodesian. And why should comfort come at the expense of your land, anyway?
    1
  35.  @mikefish8226  gladly. Life expectancy is higher in Zimbabwe. Literacy is higher as well. Urbanization is higher and infant mortality is down. It is more developed in every way. Fact check me.
    1
  36.  @kevinp.1842  you'd be surprised.
    1
  37. @mikefish8226  you claimed the quality of living had declined. Whether or not it's the global trend is irrelevant, life has vastly improved. And compare life expectancy in 1979 to today. Zimbabwe is better in every way.
    1
  38.  @ajax1475  permanently * occupied.
    1
  39.  @lyr1kn156  why?
    1
  40. Occupied by who?
    1
  41. @DukeRhodes  you're English from England, man.
    1
  42.  @krisinsaigon  in Africa, far away from Europe.
    1
  43.  @TheTrashMobileGamer  Europeans do also. Do you see segregation being imposed on them?
    1
  44.  @Aaaakiller  Zimbabwe isn't a jungle.
    1
  45.  @max420thc  which means Mugabe was bad, not that Rhodesia was good.
    1
  46. ​ @Aiphiae the majority of Rhodesia was as poor before 1980 as they would be after it.
    1
  47.  @KeynanMatamalaDeBrito  Southern Rhodesia was poorer than Zimbabwe.
    1
  48. @KeynanMatamalaDeBrito  you have no idea what would have happened. Your theory is no more valid than saying it would have been poorer.
    1
  49. @KeynanMatamalaDeBrito  yes they would. No one conquers a land to develop it.
    1
  50.  @teutonicmapper  case in point. Thank you for demonstrating.
    1