Comments by "Jim Luebke" (@jimluebke3869) on "Jordan B Peterson"
channel.
-
2
-
2
-
"Some people are making an awful lot of money off of this war"
Eh, not so much. The profit margins on ammunition are pretty low, all things considered. And if you want to sell exquisite weapon systems, your best customers aren't people whose countries are half-wrecked; they have no money. Even if you can force a peace on your terms, reparations famously backfire.
Your best customers are prosperous people in thriving countries who have looming threats on their doorstep. I'm confident that defense contractors could make even more money if we made peace in the Ukraine, even at the expense of several DonBas provinces, and stuffed the rest of the countries bordering Russia with enough defensive armaments to make the Kursk salient look like a nursery school playground. There is no slippery slope when the next step is vastly more dangerous and difficult than the last.
Then, we simply let the Russian demographic crisis age their fighting men into oblivion. Or, we let Putin look as clever as Bismarck, by making peace with us (and even something of an alliance), and turning his armies East to make sure the Chinese are too busy with a land war on their doorstep, to attempt to take over Taiwan. =)
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
"Having a system -- government, that's what we've got"
No. We have all of civil society, which includes not only government, but family, private associations, fraternal groups, churches, companies, clubs, and the rest. Without Civil Society, government devolves into totalitarianism.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@julesjacobs1 I'm afraid I don't have proof of that particular negative, just a sense (after paying bit of attention to the subject) that they didn't have a fixed moralistic objective.
The ever-ironic moral of Peace, maybe? Bringing good things back to Mongolia? Genghis may have believed that everything under the sky was his, although he was somewhat famous for not pushing his religion (aside from the precept, "Don't ever hurt a Mongol. Seriously, just don't") on the people he conquered.
And I'm not sure they were all that unique. The conquests of Tamarlane, the Imperial Japanese, the Imperial Chinese, the conquests of Julius Caesar and other Romans, the Greeks, the Persians, the Zulus... the farther back you go in time, and the farther from Europe you go, the less justification they seem to have had (or thought they needed).
Almost makes you wonder whether a moral justification for everything, even conquest, is something attributable to Christianity, too.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2