Comments by "Axxe" (@Axxe80) on "BBC News" channel.

  1. The roof, the roof, the roof is on fire! We don't need no water, let...
    4
  2. If all of you who dislike science because of your religion - why not just join the Amish? Would at least save the world from more anti-science comments on the net.
    3
  3. wtf 🤦‍♂
    3
  4. "Thou shallst not use the scripture for YouTube comments as it proves nothing and is annoying af." 2 Morons 08;15
    3
  5. Putin started the war and no one else, vatnik.
    3
  6. Wow, that's some record breaking huge pile of nonsense. 🤦‍♂
    3
  7. Couldn't you conspxxxcy believers at least invent some new myths? That portals nonsense is getting really old and boring now.
    3
  8. Want some dressing for your incoherent word salad?
    3
  9. No, the name anti matter suggests nothing like that and merely references the opposite electrial charges of atom core and hull of antimatter.
    2
  10. What a complete nonsense 🤦‍♂
    2
  11. That is not the point of their research. It is about understanding the nature of matter on a subatomic level.
    2
  12. No.
    2
  13. bs
    2
  14. OK Vatnik
    2
  15. Not even possible.
    2
  16. Get a therapy.
    2
  17. That is pure nonsense, and of course CERN has nothing to do with "playing god". There's nothing bad about particle physics.
    2
  18.  @K_d_-dz6ps  Your argument from incredulity refutes nothing and means nothing.
    2
  19. You Olgino trolls are getting worse every day 🤦‍♂
    2
  20.  @AlexanderUnit-731  Ah, that fairy tale from the first page of Putler's propaganda guide again...
    2
  21. There's nothing bad about peaceful physics research.
    2
  22.  @K_d_-dz6ps  Why do you even try to argue against evolution when you obviously didn't even correctly understand it?! I tell you why: because normally people look at facts and how they are backed up by evidence and then (!) form an opinion. You and other creationists have an opinion beforehand and then start looking for stuff that allegedly gives evidence for it. Humans are apes, that's a biological fact. The difference in intelligence between humans and other members of the hominidae family doesn't prove creationism. Btw: Evolution is scientifically proven beyond doubt, it's a fact. And almost all christian denominations agree. Why do you think you know better than expert scientists and leading theologists?
    2
  23. They have a website and a youtube channel where the projects are explained.
    2
  24. And don't forget to wear your tinfoil hat...
    2
  25.  @ZTVbrotha  Being informed about what they are actually doing there and how their facilities work is the exact opposite of being naive. Naive is what you do: watching sensationalist clickbait videos with nothing but impossible fantasy tales without any proof whatsoever and then actually believing such BS. That is naive and really dumb.
    2
  26.  @King-er7ef  Nonsense. CERN = C onseil E uropéen pour la R echerche N ucléaire
    2
  27.  @ZTVbrotha  So you believe unfounded claims from some clickbaity nonsense online and are even unedcuted enough to not know that this b.s. is actually completly impossible 🤦‍♂🤦‍♀
    2
  28.  @ZTVbrotha  No, I just don't believe silly unfounded claims that are impossible, Mr. Dunning.
    2
  29.  @DamianStefanicki  OK, definitly a stroke. Get well soon.
    2
  30. But from your intensive studies at YouTube University and Telegram College YOU know the truth 🤦‍♂
    2
  31. Your comment makes no sense at all. Here's why in short form: they do create antimatter in tiniest amounts to study its characteristics, so there's no "what if". And there is no "positive matter", there's just matter and antimatter. The difference between them is that matter atom have a core with a positive electrical charge and the electron shell with a negative electrical charge. For antimatter it's the other way round - negative electrical charge for the core and a positron shell with a positive electrical charge. Both types exist in the universe although matter is predominant and antimatter very rare.
    2
  32.  @ImaginationInAPit ...or in other words: you have no clue what you're talking about and since you don't want to admit to have written nonsense you instead post some condescending rabulistic. 🤦‍♂
    2
  33.  @paulanderson7796  Yeah you're right - actually it is a waste of time. Some people just want to believe something "non mainstream" in order to feel special, even if it's pure nonsense.
    2
  34. How did that "prediction" age, hmm?
    2
  35. "And thou shallst not spam bible quotes under science related videos as it is annoying af." 2 Morons 08.15
    2
  36. There never was a "ritual" and there's no reason why a european science organisation should care about an eclipse visible only from North America.
    2
  37. ...you mean like educated and not posting creationist nonsense?
    2
  38. Get well soon.
    1
  39.  @anjalE30  Get a therapy.
    1
  40. ok ivan...
    1
  41. 🤡
    1
  42. Morons and consp....y theoriest are in the same silly club
    1
  43. Your first statement seems incorrect to me as you obviously actually are intelligent and not missing a brain. The brainless folks come here, then just hear a word like "anti matter", decide that because it has "anti" in its name it has to be evil and than they declare their superstitious nonsense to be facts. (Same thing about CERN in general, about "black holes", about "dark matter", etc.) And they actually think that this has to be correct, as they are too dumb to be able to see that they're dumb (--> "Dunning Kruger effect"). Stating that something is beyond one own's comprehension is the opposite of that; in fact it is a sign of intelligence! TLDR: By your statement you actually showed that you are definitly NOT missing a brain!
    1
  44. Not directly - it is part of their research to have the conditions for some subatomic particles similar to what they were shortly after the big bang, but not recreating the bb itself (which isn't possible).
    1
  45. 🤦‍♂
    1
  46. bs
    1
  47. Foundational research in the field of particle physics (and some other fields) and educating new scientists and students.
    1
  48. Not sure if you're trolling or just really dumb.
    1
  49. Not really. This is foundational physics research - and from foundational research it's most of the time not clear what it would lead to - perhaps some time later it might have an impact to giving people decent meals, clear water, safe cars, housing, etc. Just imagine the time electricity was discovered and researched (or magnetism) it wouldn't have been done because they didn't have an immediate direct use for it. CERN isn't funded that heavily, it costs the individual tax payer in the member countries less than a small cup of coffee per year!
    1
  50. It's foundational research, it doesn't necessarily lead directly to a practical application. Nevertheless CERN's scientific efforts already lead to improvements in medical imaging and radiation therapy. Also I don't see what you think is dangerous about a particle collider.
    1