Comments by "B Dale" (@bdale5231) on "Sydney Watson"
channel.
-
2
-
@PaladinVII Succinctly put! Unfortunately, those who wish to manipulate society, and lead it by the nose, have collected all embers and piled and fanned them (before it would be too late) All the potentially divisive groupings that can be made, are being agitated, stoked, exaggerated to the point of extremism.. poor, poor, people! See them join in; 'It's women's fault.. It's men's fault.. Race.. Religion.. Both 'wings'.. Sexuality.. etc., etc., etc.' Counting the groups is now a full time game! Poor, poor, people :(
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Sidney You should have prefaced your piece with the question you posed near the end, almost as a throwaway. That being, what is the aim of the justice system - to punish.. deter.. rehabilitate.. to right other social injustices..? This is in fact a very important question. It is crucial that we first establish this. Much of the contradictory judgement and treatment in dealing with offenders stems from this confusion. Once we have 'its' aims in order, we can then move to establishing systems for dealing appropriately with all and any aspects related to each individual case.
One way perhaps, would be to turn it on its' head. Use the courts and basic law as the first step? - whereby, having established guilt/innocence, the sentence for that particular offence is stated, for any person - instead of the mish-mash of reports from social workers, probationary services, criminal history, et al, being presented in the courts at that point, as happens presently. In other words, separating the 'social' aspect from the 'criminal' aspect, while addressing both. Just a thought.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1