Comments by "Christian Pulido" (@christianpulido8360) on "Johnny Harris" channel.

  1.  @yazzamx6380  GPS alone proves that Curvature doesn't exist in reality. GPS shows the roads that we drive on. From San Jose CA to LA there is no curvature observed while using GPS for navigation. From San Jose CA to Texas there is no curvature observed. If we lived on an oblate spheroid then we would have been able to observe curvature while using GPS for navigation.
    1
  2.  @yazzamx6380  There is no working globe map that matches an existing oblate spheroid in reality.
    1
  3.  @yazzamx6380  It's scientifically impossible to live on a planet which means wandering star. GPS alone proves that Curvature doesn't exist in reality.
    1
  4.  @yazzamx6380  Peer-review in science the pains and problems
    1
  5.  @yazzamx6380  Read the paper 📜 that I just sent you. The one that mentions Peer-review etc.
    1
  6.  @yazzamx6380  I have already explained that patent so I'm not going to repeat myself over and over again. Also you cannot make a flat circle map from a sphere. You cannot make flat maps from that distorted desk globe map that doesn't work at all. What part of this do you not understand?
    1
  7.  @yazzamx6380  When Gleason was alive he argued the fact that we did not live on a so-called globe. Do you even know who your government is?
    1
  8.  @yazzamx6380  We observe a flat plane earth with mountains and valleys. All flat maps match an observable flat Earth in reality. Nobody uses desk globes for navigation because they do not work.
    1
  9.  @yazzamx6380  Remember that all science experiments are models based on assumptions. Also you have to take your so-called science with a grain of salt.
    1
  10.  @yazzamx6380  It's also scientifically impossible to live on a planet which means wandering star.
    1
  11.  @yazzamx6380  First of all that patent specifies that Gleason's map is not a map But a time chart little buddy. That patent specifies that Gleason's map is a projection of the globe. Gleason's map specifies that it is a projection of J.S. Christopher and New standard map of the world. Gleason's map also specifies how the seasons work on a flat earth. That patent doesn't match Gleason's map or book.
    1
  12.  @yazzamx6380  Please elaborate how that distorted desk globe model can make a flat circle map? Please elaborate how that desk globe was made without being derived from 2D? You have no argument here. Also you evaded all of my questions.
    1
  13.  @yazzamx6380  That's why you have to take your so-called science with a grain of salt
    1
  14.  @yazzamx6380  Please elaborate how you can live on a wandering star. Also try using that distorted desk globe for navigation and see how that works for you. Ok?
    1
  15.  @yazzamx6380  No, you need to answer my questions First. Also the so-called scientists claim that all maps are distorted because they are projections of the globe. Now try using that desk globe for navigation. You cannot because it doesn't work.
    1
  16.  @yazzamx6380  You are just posting your own opinions with no evidence to support your claims existing in reality. A sphere cannot make a circle. A sphere is made by a circle. It's called geometry.
    1
  17.  @yazzamx6380  You don't have a working globe map that matches an existing oblate spheroid. So I'm not sure what you are talking about?
    1
  18.  @yazzamx6380  All flat maps are scaled and based on an observable flat Earth . What flat Maps match an existing oblate spheroid in reality? Present the evidence? I'll wait.
    1
  19.  @yazzamx6380  Gleason's map is accurate buddy. That's why pilots , Army, and USGS use Azimuth maps in reality.
    1
  20.  @yazzamx6380  Why do you continue to talk about other maps that are not based on the so-called globe. Please by all means try using that desk globe for navigation and see how that works for you.
    1
  21.  @yazzamx6380  Well you can measure any distance between two points from that desk globe right. Now try using it for navigation. You cannot because it doesn't work and it was Derived from 2D.
    1
  22.  @yazzamx6380  There is no existing globe which is a wandering star. . OMG how does it prove that you live on a globe when there is no observable globe existing in reality. Also that desk globe doesn't work for navigation. Please make some sense when you talk to me ok?
    1
  23.  @yazzamx6380  All you have to do is try using that desk globe for navigation so you can see that it doesn't work. Also there is no existing oblate spheroid in reality. It's also scientifically impossible to live on a wandering star.
    1
  24.  @yazzamx6380  That distorted desk globe was already proven wrong. Also GPS shows the roads that we drive on so why is it that we don't observe curvature while using GPS for navigation? You have evaded all of my questions. Good bye little buddy.
    1
  25.  @yazzamx6380  Now try using that desk globe for navigation between any two locations. You cannot because it doesn't work at all. So, I'm not sure what part of this you don't understand?
    1
  26.  @yazzamx6380  Well that's not what Gleason:s book mentions. Gleason's map is accurate. Also you don't know how big Australia is because that desk globe doesn't work or exist in reality. How many troll accounts do you have? You think I don't know who you are? Why are you afraid of using that desk globe for navigation. It's accurate right? Then use it for navigation between those locations. So that's what really matters. Good bye.
    1
  27.  @yazzamx6380  Well they claim that all flat maps are based on the so-called globe. But that's impossible because you cannot make flat maps from a distorted desk globe that was derived from 2D and doesn't work at all. They also claim that we live on a globe which is a wandering star. They also specify that the desk globe was made from a flat circle 2D map. So you have no argument here unless you can use that desk globe for navigation in reality between any two points.
    1
  28.  @yazzamx6380  But they are using flat maps for navigation in Australia and not that desk globe. When you can present evidence of pilots or anybody using desk globes for navigation and also present evidence of an existing oblate spheroid in reality then you can claim that you live on an oblate spheroid which is a wandering star. You know what I'll make it easy for you please try using that desk globe for navigation between any two locations that you measure ok? You know you cannot and that's why you are wrong.
    1
  29.  @yazzamx6380  Azimuth is based on circle and not a sphere little buddy.
    1
  30.  @yazzamx6380  All flat maps are based on an observable flat Earth. It's scientifically impossible to make projection from a distorted desk globe model that doesn't work.
    1
  31.  @yazzamx6380  It's funny how you always talk about maps when you don't even have a working globe map that matches an existing oblate spheroid in reality. Australia is not observed on an oblate spheroid. You also talk about measuring distances from that distorted desk globe model that was Derived from 2D and doesn't work for navigation. This is you I can measure any distance between two points from that desk globe and it matches reality. Then why cant you use it for navigation? So if you cannot use it for navigation then it's impossible to make flat maps from that desk globe.
    1
  32.  @yazzamx6380  All Azimuth maps are based on a circle little buddy. The only distorted map is that desk that doesn't work at all.
    1
  33.  @yazzamx6380  Now try using that desk globe for navigation in all of those locations that you mentioned. You cannot because that desk globe doesn't work. This is pure comedy gold. Thank you for the comedy.
    1
  34.  @yazzamx6380  No, you are a the troll. Also there is no evidence of an existing oblate spheroid in reality. You have never observed an existing oblate spheroid in reality. And it's scientifically impossible to live on a wandering star.
    1
  35.  @yazzamx6380  Australia is observed on a flat earth.
    1
  36.  @yazzamx6380  There are no globe maps. That distorted desk globe cannot make flat maps because it doesn't work.
    1
  37.  @yazzamx6380  Then why cant you use that desk globe for navigation if all flat maps are projections from that desk globe. Answer the question and stop running away from the question. Ok? So you see it's impossible to make flat maps from a distorted desk globe model that doesn't work. What part of this do you not understand?
    1
  38.  @yazzamx6380  An arc of the horizon measured between a fixed point (such as true north) and the vertical circle passing through the center of an object usually in astronomy and navigation clockwise from the north point 360 degrees.
    1
  39.  @yazzamx6380  You are changing the subject. If all flat maps are projections from that desk globe then why cant you use that desk globe for navigation? Also how can you make flat maps from a map that doesn't work? That literally makes no sense.
    1
  40.  @yazzamx6380  How can flat maps be more detailed when they are projections from that desk globe that supposedly is not distorted? They did not change reality because it's too difficult to carry that desk globe model.
    1
  41.  @yazzamx6380  No, that's a lie you cannot use that desk globe for navigation at all.
    1
  42.  @yazzamx6380  Well they claim that we live on an oblate spheroid which is a wandering star. They claim that all flat maps are projections of the so-called globe. But you cannot use that desk globe for navigation in reality. So it's scientifically impossible to make projections from that desk globe that doesn't work.
    1
  43.  @yazzamx6380  That desk globe model is made from a flat circle map. It is then placed in a machine which molds the disk into a hemispherical shape.
    1
  44.  @yazzamx6380  The USGS doesn't use desk globe models that were derived from 2D for navigation. Please stop lying.
    1
  45.  @yazzamx6380  Then why arent pilots using that desk globe for navigation? Please by all means try using that desk globe for navigation and see how that works for you.
    1
  46.  @yazzamx6380  No, you cannot use that desk globe navigation. Also there is no evidence of an existing oblate spheroid in reality.
    1
  47.  @yazzamx6380  The FAA handbooks specify that pilots fly straight and level little buddy.
    1
  48.  @yazzamx6380  All navigation is based on a circle. Compasses, Radar, Gyrocompass, sextants etc.
    1
  49.  @yazzamx6380  Even the Helicentric model that is inaccurate is based on a circle. They always show the observer on the circle of a sphere as well.
    1
  50.  @yazzamx6380  Straight: extending or moving uniformly in one direction only: without a curve or bend. Properly positioned so as to be level, upright, or symmetrical.
    1