Comments by "Itinerant Patriot" (@itinerantpatriot1196) on "Disparu" channel.

  1. Man, this thing is like the crew of the Titanic having radar saying: "The hell with what's on that screen, I feel like hitting the damn thing because it just needs to be hit. Someone should have hit that f***in iceberg years ago and by God we are going to be that someone." I get the ruse, put out the black lady, call any attack racist, and create a built-in reason for the disaster, the bigots and haters. It just seems to me, if the people at Amazon who are in charge of marketing this thing had half an ounce of self-awareness they would have started from the premise that their production is a story of fantasy based on their views and that while the retelling may not appeal to Tolkien's fanbase because of differences between it and the written works they hope people will give it a fair viewing for what is and judge it on that, a stand-alone entity based on the world of Tolkien but not necessarily of the world of Tolkien. At least then you disarm the traditionalists to a degree and at the same time acknowledge the thing was never built for them. It is aimed at Gen-Z and fellow travelers more interested in subtexts and messaging than storytelling which only acts as a backdrop, something to keep the kiddies coming back. It will no doubt flop with die-hard Tolkien fans but it may do quite well with that younger generation who don't hold Tolkien and his stories in the same regard. But they are playing a dangerous game getting nasty with that Tolkien fanbase because now it is not that group who are coming off as the bullies, it's the producers of the series and the half famous actors they plucked off the casting couch to act in the thing, not the traditional Tolkien fanbase who have simply expressed an opinion. At the end of the day, nobody likes a bully. So why set yourself up to be one? Perhaps it was just how they were raised.
    2
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. "Journalistic integrity." There's a contradiction in terms. As for controlled media, they'll do what they feel they have to do. Look at the way they handled our dementia riddled president and then look how fast they all acted in unison to take him down. And the coverage they gave his stoner VP after he was out of the picture? They went from selling that drunk as the 21st Century Winston Churchill to asking her what her favorite color is. Journalistic integrity 🤣🤣🤣🤣 On the question of: "What's in Rachel Zegler's future?" I'll say it again. She has two options. Option A: Marry some rich 50 + guy looking for an ornament to hang around his arm in order to impress his buddies at the country club. Or option B: The gig as the new AT&T girl now that the old girl...is well, old and not young and cute anymore. As for A, that option has an extremely short shelf-life because after said rich guy has had enough sex to prove to himself that he still has it and once his country club buddies are no longer impressed by the guys talking bling she'll get the severance package spelled out in the prenup and be shown the door because, really, how long could any man be expected to listen to the nonsense she calls Tuesday? The over/under for that arranged marriage would be one year tops. The AT&T gig won't allow her to live the lifestyle she feels entitled to but it will be steady work for a decade or so. After which point she'll suffer the same: "You're not young and cute anymore" fate her predecessor dealt with and like option A, she will be shown the door. Let's face it, there's only room in the ad world for one Flo. And while the longevity is appealing, the severance package with AT&T will leave much to be desired. Nothing from nothing as the song goes. Sorry Rachel, but the press loves a villain and you stepped up and said: "No worries, I got this.". On the right they have Elon. You served em up one on the left. Now they can badmouth you and use it as proof that they are balanced when it comes to public floggings.
    1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. I had no idea those shows outside of rings of power even existed. People will continue to tell these companies that two men having sex and guys dressed like women is nasty and people don't want it shoved in their faces. It has nothing to do with challenging social norms or whatever that fruitcake was blabbering about. The bottom line is normal people have a natural visceral aversion to abnormal behavior because it's gross and nasty and anyone who is not a pervert simply doesn't want to look at that crap. It doesn't take a poll and a deep analytical dive into the data to figure that one out. So why does it keep happening? Why do companies like Amazon, disney, target, bud light, and others keep putting these unqualified woke 30-something women in charge of their marketing and production teams knowing in advance they will most likely crash and burn and cost the company millions, billions for that matter? Because it is their religion. Wokism is every bit a religion as Catholicism or Protestantism. They have their own temples, cannon, and internal hierarchy. It is a matriarchy with high priestesses like that ditz who destroyed bud light and this woman crashing Amazon's creative department. The whole I am woman hear me bore experiment would have been abandoned a long time ago in a saner world but the world has changed. Wokism is all the rage and it will not go gently into that sweet night. Expect more of this and don't waste any time trying to figure out the why's behind it. That is a fools errand.
    1
  15. 1
  16. 1