Comments by "Andrei Lukyanov" (@andreilukyanov4286) on "Flashback FM" channel.

My grandma actually aimed better than this terminator. She knew how to shoot and had a pretty good score the only time she tried.
1
@cookiecrumb1018 T-800 didn't care about Matt. It cared about "Sarah" (who was Ginger). It merely threw Matt away because it was a nuisance, like a fly and kept going for whom it thought to be Sarah. Till Matt was killed by T-800 attempts to move him away. Mind, whenever T-800 notices his primary target "Sarah" (Ginger), it kills her instantly and fires multiple bullets in her corpse to make sure she is dead.
1
@jhusseyIII A throw by a human being on a concrete with him falling on top of you may knock you out or break your rib. A throw by a metallic robot with a superhuman strenght where you fly 30 feet and hit a metallic wall will first get you unconscious because of a brain concussion. Second, your lungs, kidney and liver will be smashed by the impact, basically equivalent of you falling on your back from a several store building. Or you, hitting a hard obstacle with your car as a driver with no air-bag. Not to mention that the limb this robot was holding you by befor the throw will have all bones shattered.
1
@nathanbell8356 Even being dumb consumers and even knowing that this is a sci-fi movie, it would be neccessary to still have a minimum of realism AKA a decently written plot. Yes, for a $200M movie, which is a part of a major franchise, a decently written plot is a bare minimum. When things in the plot don't make much sense, I automatically conclude that the movie is for early teenagers. Which probably IS whom this movie is made for.
1
@Salem-1610 Or AT LEAST making him fall unconscious out of a brain concussion. With all of his vital organs in a smoothie-state, which he will deal with when he will wake up (if he will).
1
@Maximus20778 T-800 in 1984 movie didn't really care about Ginger's BF. After its attempt to elliminate him immediately failed (a lethal punch), it decided not to lose a time on Matt. It was going for Ginger whom it thought to be Sarah Connor (and killed her instantly). Matt was merely brushed off like an annoying fly, because he wasn't a target. Brushing Matt off a couple of times litterally killed him.
1
@Maximus20778 Just saying, you are trying to logically explain something, which was just a poor writting
1
@Сайтамен Better tell me why John Connor has to be on the frontline, fighting like a regular grunt and yell "Go! Go!" to helicopters flying above both of his shoulders? This whole film is CRINGE. To me the only movie which made sense was Terminator (1984). T-2 was a great sequel, but just because people craved for a sequel. From a story line POV it was needless.
1
@wjzav1971 If I were a screen writter, I would have made a Terminator-3. It would have been about the Future War prequel to T-1. It would have been dark, gloomy and scary to give watchers PTSD. And the bunker Terminator scene would have been included. With this one single T-800 wiping out the entire bunker, full of soldiers, who weren't able to stop it, it shooting surgically precisely, being able to perfectly use obstacles to avoid being destroyed and Reese, managing to crawl away. And also getting into the control center, imitating a bunker leader's voice, making more units to fall into a trap. I would have shown rotten toothed, riddled with diseases humans, dressed in rags, eating rats, living misery (no cool fashionable haircuts, no sexy make up, no piercing, no fancy tattoos, no smartphones, because the War started in 1997) outnumbering machines heavily, but machines being infinitely better fighters. I would have shown how much lives it takes to obtain even one small victory. I would have shown human slaves, loading piles of bodies of killed resistance soldiers and putting them into Skynet incinerators to extract energy. There will be no waves of "skeleton-type" T-800 on the battlefield. Only inhuman looking, perfectly adapted for fighting, hunter-killers : different robo-tanks (with sensors-« eyes » not only in front but also on their backs), HK-drones, suicide-drones. The only purpose of designing and production of T-600,700,800 will be to be combat infiltrators. And nothing more. There will be no TX, no Rev-9, and other BS terminators. T-800 will be the newest. T-1000 will be the only one, very recently finalized, inactive prototype, activated only in the brink of a defeat of the Skynet as a last ditch effort to change the past. And all this Time-Machine being finished hastily, litterally hours before the defeat, having barely enough time to send two terminators before humans would have retaken it, sending Reese and previously captured one single unique T-800, kept for a very special occasion. Sending them almost in the midst of a fight, with the Time Machine being irrepairably damaged in the fight. I would have gone to the basics of Terminator (1984) I would have made Skynet appear an absolutely cold, emotionless, soulless, rationally thinking net of military computers, which somehow just bugged and it made them defend themselves instead of defending their creators, using their tech capabilities to learn and become even more efficient and smart. No Helena Bonham Carter evilishly screaming antopomorphical BS "Skynet". To boil it down, Skynet IS NOT a life-form. It is just an AI and nothing more.
1
@wjzav1971 "This is how a teenager would imagine the battle." Completely. Like take a 10 years old schoolboy and ask him how he sees the final battle of humans vs Skynet. That's what he would make.
1
They aren’t actually the backbone. The backbone is non-humanoid operators, tank-drones and flying hunters-seekers. Humanoid T were used for infiltration. This is probably the last days of Skynet where it had thrown all but kitchen sink into the battle.
1
Michael Edwards was the best John Connor. Composed and enigmatic. You see this scene and you understand: this guy looks like a commander. You see others and understand: this is a movie.
1
What a friggin garbage.
1
They honestly should have just not make any sequels after T-2. Live it alone. Even T-2 was needless from a storyline perspective. But granted, it was so gorgeously made, actors played so great, there was depth, we can accept it as a sequel. If they REALLY wanted to explore, they could have made a prequel about the future war. The Terminator-3. But it should have been FAR BETTER made than what we had in Salvation.
1
А по-моему просто крутые спецэффекты, а сама сцена написана отвратительно. Впечатление: последний бой, как он видится двенадцатилетнему мальчику. Джон Коннор, который главный лидер Человечества, воюет на фронте, как обыкновенный солдафон, вместо того, чтобы управлять из штаба, как это видно в Терминаторе-2. Наверное, чтобы его быстрее убили. Джон Коннор орет вертолетам: "Вперед! Вперед!" Джон Коннор, произносящий излишне приторную, театральную речь. Бррррр. По-моему в Терминаторе-2 был отличный пролог про будущую войну.
1
Dark Fate? Man, you set the bar VERY low.
1