Comments by "LRRPFco52" (@LRRPFco52) on "Forgotten Weapons"
channel.
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@FeatheredDino Real AR-10s from back then are more reliable than most of the modern after-market parts guns. I've been working with AR-10s, SR-25s, aftermarket imitations, and Hk417s in high volume since 2002, have owned at least 6 .308 Win or .260 Rem versions of them over that time, repaired, accurized, and trouble-shot quite a few of them.
Big challenges from an engineering standpoint are:
* Bore volume vs projectile mass and propellant mass
* Bolt and carrier mass ratio (AR-10 was designed on 1:3 ratio.)
* Cartridge stack mass resistance to spring lift, especially under the torque moment from the rifle counter to the rifling direction
AR-15 in 5.56 doesn't have those problems.
I can't recall any notable malfunctions with post-1996 ArmaLite Inc. AR-10s, SR-25s, or my GAP built .308 and .260 Rem. DPMS LR-308s and LR-260 had problems. The old school Dutch ArmaLite AR-10s are very pleasant to shoot, unbelievably accurate, and balance well in the hands.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@PBVader I can see .076" ports at MLGS 16-18", not 20" RLGS, unless I'm missing something. For reference, I've been really big into AR-10s since the late 1980s, have owned, shot, and worked on many of them, to include Dutch ArmaLites, Eagle Arms ArmaLites, SR-25s, DPMS, Iron Ridge Arms, GAP, ASA, JP, Bushmaster BAR-10, RRA LAR-8, DPMS GII, Savage MSR-10.
I've had the gas port diameter conversation with multiple upper tier manufacturers, and have measured port diameters on a lot of barrels.
Maybe my memory has just gone totally TU, but those numbers sound way off to me.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1