Comments by "LRRPFco52" (@LRRPFco52) on "Zeihan on Geopolitics"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Obama was basically an absentee President who really did believe he's smarter than everyone else, condescending with his smirks, habitually late, didn't like to have many meetings, and let the political activists run much of the show. Valerie Jarrett had a lot of power in that WH, as did Hillary as SECSTATE, and Joe Biden as VP serving his masters.
They all were working for Putin, Hu, Muslim Brotherhood, and the Mullahs of Iran on many fronts:
1. Uranium One to help Putin revitalize Russia's nuclear weapons
2. Burisma with Hunter Biden acting as an insurance policy from investigations into how Putin was using Burisma to pilfer Ukrainian revenue
3. Keeping Ukraine vulnerable to Russian invasion by denying them arms, and not lifting a finger when Putin invaded in 2014
4. Coercing Poroshenko to fire Viktor Shokin who was investigating Burisma. Obama then flew to England in Sep 2014 and told David Cameron to shut down their investigation into Zlochevsky, CEO of Burisma living in Monaco.
5. Syria-let Putin strengthen Russia's footprint there with Assad
6. Billions in cash sent to Iran with nothing in return
7. MB in the WH
8. Blatantly soured the relationship with Israel
9. Open affronts to the UK
10. Energy policy that benefitted Russia
11. Killed the F-22 before we could go into Full Rate Production, which created a fighter gap
12. Hillary destabilizing Libya, with Benghazi blowing up into the spotlight and the death of Ambassador Stevens
13. Hillary selling US secrets via her basement server, which processed tens of thousands of sensitive documents to hostile foreign governments not authorized to have them
These were just some of the high crimes and treason going on during the Obama Presidency. The domestic side was also a nightmare with a weaponized IRS, Fast & Furious, illegal spying, racial agitation, ACA, bail outs, divisiveness, and erosion of the military culture.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@JimVanderveen We're in an economic situation with no precedent and no models:
1. Baby boomers retiring or dead, not buying big ticket items anymore.
2. China manufacturing de-coupling from US, high unemployment in China, demographic collapse has begun there.
3. Europe has entered demographic collapse.
4. Russia has entered demographic collapse.
5. US has steady growth, manufacturing re-shoring, consumption driven by a small cohort of Gen X and large cohort of Millennials.
6. Housing availability for Single Family Residences is way behind on supply.
7. Foreign investors who have lost billions in Wall Street have moved into residential real estate, inflating the median unit prices with corporate money, and then rent out those homes.
8. Interest rates are still relatively low, but median home prices are dramatically higher than ever.
9. Auto loans have crept up into intrusive and prohibitive % of median household income.
10. Student loans have inflated preposterously, while education quality has dropped inversely to the amount of money spent.
11. Natural gas is almost free for the US to extract and distribute, and we're effectively energy independent.
12. The US military has been in strategic withdrawal from Europe since 1992, as well as the Pacific.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@davidthompson4383 Royal Marine Commandos are essentially a maritime special operations force with a dramatically-longer initial training pipeline and higher OPTEMPO. They are more like US Army Ranger Regiment and UK Para Regiment in culture, training, and capabilities. I’ve worked with all 3, so this isn’t an academic perspective foe me.
USMC is small by US standards, but huge by international standards, so a Commando Regiment isn’t a good comparison with 3 Marine Divisions, which have their own organic aviation artillery, heavy lift, armor, drone, cyber, and combined arms forces capabilities. USMC brings M777 and F-35Bs to the fight, whereas Royal Marines rely on other organizations for those capabilities.
I agree on training standards in the UK vs the US, but this is mainly because the US military is so huge, whereas the UK forces are so tiny. I embraced the UK approach to many things with what I did and still do, since many aspects of it are more professional. US wings on logistics and weapons quality, but UK definitely has a more combat-focused training culture.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@robdyck1187 Yes, we lived through the development and implementation of GPS within DoD, having come from a ton of work on INS prior to that. This was all on cutting-edge, multibillion dollar programs with top priority in USAF primarily. I've spent decades dealing with RF propagation, antennae design, xmit/receiver architecture, waveforms, and a list of other challenges. Towers would only be useful for coastal navigation in the Arctic, provided you could maintain them. Mx is a b*tch in arctic conditions, which I've also spent a bit of time in, both in summer and winter.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The US has a lot of deep sea ports along 3 huge coastlines, not including Alaska. The maintenance and overhaul schedules have been ongoing for over a century in the US, supporting the most powerful and modernized Navy in history. We have dry docks in Hawaii, Seattle, Portland, San Diego x2, Bayonne, Brooklyn, Sturgeon Bay x3, Newport News x 8, Pascagoula x 2, Philadelphia x3, and Boston.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1