Comments by "LRRPFco52" (@LRRPFco52) on "Zeihan on Geopolitics"
channel.
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
Sweden, like many other remnants of the bygone empires, had some small firms that adapted to new developments pioneered in England, Germany, and the US, but its modernized infrastructure came much later, namely after WWII.
Sweden was a major naval power in Europe up until the early 1800s, having spent centuries dominating the Nordics and Northwestern Russia, with bouts of competition with Polish-Lithuanian Empire as well.
There is a delusional sense of romanticism among Swedes that they are still some type of super power, without even being a middle power anymore.
They definitely contributed to the development of some new artillery technology and high quality steel barrel manufacturing even in the late 1800s, after the Prussians really took high-strength steel artillery to the forefront in the Franco-Prussian War of 1870-71, but the 1800s-forward Swedish population has never been large enough to support modern industrial sectors. Take gas turbines, for example.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
There were waves of successive industrial revolutions that happened outside of the USSR during the Cold War, that left Russia and its satellite states behind, because of the centrally-planned economy that served as a vassal network to reinforce the Russian security apparatus, not enrich the infrastructure of the satellite states.
This is what he’s referring to, especially in context of the revolution in electronics, automated manufacturing, advanced tooling, programming, semiconductors, telecommunications, aerospace, etc.
Russia handicapped Czechoslovakia in many ways, even down to small arms. Czechoslovakia had superior weapons designs and cartridges that weren’t standard with Warsaw Pact, but Russia forced them to adopt their standards anyway. Czechs made some of the finest small arms prior to WWII, and still do, but weren’t allowed to really blossom with creativity and problem-solving to their potential.
Russians didn’t like being out-shined, which all you need to do is show up, so they were very condescending and oppositional to Czech ingenuity. By the time the Russians political-economic abortion had collapsed, Czechs were ready once again to kick things into gear.
Supporting evidence: Czech Republic went from $40.7 Billion GDP in 1990, to $282.3 Billion in 2021. Same thing happened in Poland, only they went from $254 billion to $1.6 Trillion (larger population, resources, etc.)
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
@Foogle6594 Peter started out with STRATFOR in the 2000s, where they continually did white papers for US and global clients, to include DoD, defense ministries, foreign governments, huge industrial sectors all over the world, finance, transportation, intelligence agencies, etc.
He's not a YouTube guy who relies on YouTube for income. I suspect he recognized YouTube as the new marketing medium standard, where if you don't have a channel, you won't be taken seriously.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@basestone Marshall Plan immigration brought in unskilled workers from Turkey, Italy, Spain, Yugoslavia, and North Africa.
They loved socialism with all its hand-outs, which left the burden even greater on actual Germans. The posterity of the immigrants are a mix of a few technically-inclined, failures to integrate, and straight up welfare-class people. The unity of Germanic peoples from the Prussian Reforms, Kaiser Republic, and reactionary Nazi era are long-gone.
The Brits and French finally got their wish by destroying Germany, but they suffer from the same problems too. They all are headed into demographic winter, flooded with incompatible ethnic immigrants who have no historical or ideological connection to the land, hate its native inhabitants, and expect hand-outs and "free" services.
Continental Europe is ripe for internal conflict, let alone Russian invasion. Have you been to France lately?
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@SianaGearz I've lived all over the US, Europe, and Russia, have been to Canada (among 30 nations in total). I'm also a continual student of the geography and population statistics for G20 and other nations.
The biggest difference you see between Europe and the US are suburbs. Suburbs are where the bulk of the US population lives.
We never saw sprawling suburbs in Europe after WWII because Europe was already population-dense, suffered massive destruction to cities and infrastructure, and was very poor due to substantial losses of prime age males. Open land in Europe is used for farming.
Europe remains a very apartment and government project-focused housing market with extremely limited ownership opportunities, high taxation/theft of labor, with centrally-planned urbanization.
Russia is like stepping into a time machine back into a frozen world only our great-great grandparents might recognize.
The US has vast open spaces, especially West of the Mississippi. East of the Mississippi, the population is more dense, but you can still own large lots of land for individual family residences not only on the South, but in New England.
In the Midwest, there are very large parcels for single family residences as well.
In the West, it's much more dry, but still has large parcels and homes in the suburbs. What we consider tiny and claustrophobic would be spacious and opulent in Europe.
Geography and climate form culture. The US is warm, wide, open, and free. Europe is tighter, colder, crowded, and very diverse.
5
-
5
-
@paskowitz 100%. I lived all over Russia, which is a very poor country compared to the 30 other countries I’ve been to or lived in. Poland’s economy grew 6-fold since 1991, which is what Ukraine saw happening and wondered why they couldn’t have the same thing, especially since they have more people and more resources.
It’s why Ukrainians wanted out from under the boot of Russian puppets, so I’ve been paying close attention to the events in Ukraine, especially since the early 2000s.
I like Tucker Carlson a lot, but he’s simply out of his league when it comes to foreign policy. Sure, you can go to Globus (German mega store) in Russia if you have money and buy plenty of quality food, but most people don’t have that kind of money in Russia.
What I noticed in Russia is that adults had no sense of hope, no happiness. Just struggle day-to-day between packs of cigarettes and alcohol, whatever comes is their fate.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@nunyabidness3075 Most nations. Being an officer means you came from a certain family with connections and privilege, but not good enough to be higher up in government.
As such, officers distance themselves from conscripts and only associate with each other, using their power to enrich themselves and pretend to be part of the class structure they're not.
They don't like anything resembling discomfort, uncleanliness, hardship, or inconvenience.
The US, Canada, UK, Danes, Norwegians, Germans, legacy NATO nations, and Australians are the exceptions to this where a meritorious framework is more in-place. Combat arms officers pride themselves on embracing and enforcing hardship, or at least the impression of it for the garritroopers.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5