Comments by "George Albany" (@Spartan322) on "Asmongold TV "
channel.
-
60
-
58
-
36
-
23
-
22
-
17
-
14
-
The Abortion opinion he touted is how you can tell asmon doesn't know anything about the facts regarding politics. Yes there are people who do get late term elective abortions asmon, also Planed Parenthood encourages late term abortions, some going as far as 8 months. Not that it resolves the issue at all, its an excuse to take no moral responsibility, but can't even be rationally consistent on the issue.
Also asmon doesn't understand how legal argumentation works, the expectation is that a moral a righteous doctor will desire the best of his patient in disregard to law, that's the Hippocratic Oath, any who won't fulfill that shouldn't be doctors and should be legally charged over it instead. Else if the law impacts the decision, then there is no law you can impart on a doctor that can either prevent or encourage positive outcomes, permissive and prohibitive laws will both create negative outcomes, in which case there is no reason to have a government, if you're reasoning is to claim reason, you are lacking any reason to have government period. Doesn't understand the rational conclusion of his position, its a nonsense and stupid one, we don't take that dumb outlook in any other case, but when its abortion all of sudden its "we can decide" as if we don't do so in every other case. All law is imposed morality, its just a matter of what god you serve.
13
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@C.S.Martin
"The monetary value of is currently defined by supply and demand,"
First off no, fiat currencies are not really defined by supply and demand at all.
And this is a fallacious claim by someone that doesn't know the reason behind economics, if that were true then you could buy bread anywhere you go by simple trade, that would mean all things stay the same value in relation to each other and there be no inflation in anything but money. (which is false, gold and precious metals inflate all the time, look up the platinum dumps of South America during the Spanish colonization, or the overmining of gold that happened constantly even when it wasn't a currency, non-currencies inflate too) That doesn't happen, in the desert a bottle of water is not the same value as a bottle of water in a temperate forest. This is what we refer to as subjective value, you could trade me anything you want in a desert, I would not accept anything that wasn't water, but you do the same in a temperate forest and you'll find I don't so much care about a bottle of water. If value is defined intrinsically, tell me the objective value of gold in comparison to bread, how is that enforced? If intrinsic value exists, you can always define bread by gold and gold by bread, and thus all gold weight would have a ratio to that bread in every case. Can you show me anywhere in history where this has happened? I can give you plenty where that hasn't, including very recent history, or even ancient history, but I have not once seen a case in history where anything even has stable relative values to each other. Nor have I seen a case where demand is capable to be treated as objective. You want what you want, if you wanted a painting, that's your defined subjective desire, you have a demand to acquire it, but not everyone shares the valuation of that subjective desire, that's subjective demand. You'd be willing to pay a certain amount for a painting that others would not, if intrinsic value was found, you would find that both the uninterested and interested party would be willing to buy the painting at the same price, but we know that isn't the case, its one of the many reasons auctions exist.
"but that's only because it has intrinsic value."
It doesn't thought, let me ask you, what defines value? As in how do you define intrinsic value that can evaluated in disregard to wealth and currency? And how do you apply that in such a way that every single person to every exist in reality would perfectly agree with that value definition that they'd all be willing to partake of the thing being valuated? And that goes for everything in the market that has ever or will ever exist. How do you perfectly decide every single bit of this?
"Not sure I understand the second part of your demonstration ("intrinsic value would mean everything would be priced the same in accordance to wealth"); why you talkin' bout wealth?"
Because its correcting for wealth, its easier to treat value as a stable concept in your worldview if we control for wealth. But that case demonstrates the fallacy in that worldview hence why doing such throws you off, for we know that no matter the control had value is not static for anything, if we control for wealth of a market and individual, the individual still decides what is and is not valuable and thus devises demand which deviates from another's individual demand which means its subjective. It is required to demonstrate that value is objective in order to demonstrate it is intrinsic which you can not do is demand is relative to those participating in the market, such that demand is subjective, making the value subjective which in turn makes the price also subjective, but the price isn't subjective because of the currency, the currency needs to objective in order for it to be used, the logical argument (and as required by occam's razor) has to say that price is an approximation of the subjective value for the objective currency.
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@shinHis3 Its not that its not a big deal, what he did is a big deal, the problem is he's done very little since and nothing relating to the field they pulled him in on, and he's not the only 14 year old to contribute to the field at that era. The problem in that era of computing, if you understood anything about a computer, you had to be a wizard, everyone with any experience with computers had to be that good or else they wouldn't be capable to work with the computers, (it was a period where if you didn't know how your computer kernel worked you literally weren't touching the computer, it would do nothing for you quite literally, or worse you'd break a million dollar machine, and yeah that's a bit of an hyperbole, it was usually less then that, but it was still expensive if you screwed up a rig in the 70s or early 80s, which was when personal computing was only starting to pick up, you caused a lot of problems and costed a company a lot of money, and those early PCs were still easily screwed up by the user if they didn't know what they were doing, before PCs you had to manage or write every single program manually) in that time what he did was a litmus test for computing.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
@TreasureJanasia That's not how it works, they can let him being totally unqualified, the reason they do that is because its up to the jury at that point, they tried to set him as qualified there but he's, what qualifications did he have for statistical analysis or social media analysis? And the judge has been super bad at ruling out crap, she's hyper-conservative on anything that would give Amber possibility of an appeal, (and similar for Johnny, but at this point he's unlikely to appeal) throwing him out wouldn't have but she doesn't feel confident saying that. (said by the lawyers that were on RekietaLaw, most especially by Nick Rekieta) So no, he's not qualified, the court will rarely ever throw out unqualified expert witnesses unless they clearly demonstrate they aren't smart enough to argue that they can do anything.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Emil still seems a like a pathetic loser, and he may not be the entire problem, but he definitely is a source of many problems at Bethesda, all writing decisions literally had to go through Emil. Also it doesn't matter what he claims, they clearly lacked a company dedicated design document for Starfield, that's why as a game design piece its complete nonsense, its all over the place, every game that Emil had a major hand in controlling has the exact same problem with no central vision, which is the whole purpose of a design document, and the story constantly contradicts itself, something that a design document explicitly solves, if one of the common factors of a story being bad is that the lead writer who controls the story, the lead writer is most certainly a problem. And when you act so petty and pathetic, and now the company is acting petty and pathetic in the steam reviews, that just demonstrates that there is clearly a massive problem and Emil is a major part of it.
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2