Comments by "George Albany" (@Spartan322) on "Asmongold TV " channel.

  1. Just to point, if your state doesn't recognize common-law marriage (most states do not), you can religiously marry a woman without legally marrying her and she basically can't file for no-fault divorce and alimony because there is no legal marriage to divorce.
    2
  2.  @TheRealRealMClovin  Sarcasm and rhetorical statements are inherently context sensitive. Context absolutely changes this. "If Hasan said ”I support and love the houthis terror group” do i need more context than that?" If he were sarcastic or speaking rhetorically, yes. And there's any number of other reasons, which can include being a joke or a troll. Like merely stating is not enough context to make a fair judgement.
    2
  3. Just gonna point out, most of the things he claimed were neither devised nor standardized by government, power regulation was not devised by government, monitors and keyboards have never been regulated by government, networking wasn't either, the internet itself is based on the DARPA program, but they haven't been in control of it since the 80s.
    2
  4. By the way buying and burning a Tesla without proper precautions in a safe place would still be a crime because its endangerment, so you wouldn't be allowed to buy a Tesla and burn it unless you burn it in a remote location, as the battery fires are nearly impossible to put out and the potential damage to the property of others unless in a remote location is functionally guaranteed.
    2
  5.  @matt60497  The modern Jew also can't actually prove that they are the sons of Abraham either, (thus the Levite priesthood is confirmed to be dead and there is no way to prove the Messiah according to them) they literally can't receive any authority from the Tanakh to rebuild the Temple (they also weren't given any signs to return to Jerusalem by God) cause the genealogies were destroyed in 70AD in the Abomination of Desolation with the destruction of the Temple.
    2
  6.  @pokey013  Yeah, its not that I hate him personally or what he's done or that I'm jealous that he is way superior to me in a specific field (or perhaps in other computing fields which he might be, but I don't know cause I've not seen much of his work outside the one he claims expertise in) he's definitely very knowledgeable on, (I don't exactly care to be experienced in kernel development and I recognize its importance even when it doesn't much interest me) nor that I think he's done nothing of note, its that he acted and referred to himself as an expert in a field, which is fair because he has a lot of knowledge and experience on it, in a fairly arrogant manner as though he's some prolific member of the community. (which I get as a Linux nut myself, but even so there is a modesty you should have for that) And that's not to say he wasn't at some point (though he is definitely not one involved in devising say the Unix model of software, which is one of the most important things Unix gave the world) but he hasn't been for a long time. This is what kinda pisses me off about him, the arrogance of expertise. And thing is I can sweep that under the rug under conventional circumstance, but his knowledge and experience is completely irrelevant to the case and he doesn't know anything about statistical analysis most especially. I wouldn't really say anything about him, most especially not disparage his accomplishments (which I don't doubt are many legitimate ones) if he didn't make claims he couldn't possibly make in regards to a field he seems to know nothing about. (and I mean accomplishment in the past 3 decades, not the ones going back to say Unix, AIX, and Solaris)
    2
  7. He accepted and deserved to be punished for it, he can refuse, and he should've said "I'm not a statistical nor social media expert" because he's freaking not, he's low level kernel development expert, there is no reason to expect any of his skills translate to this, especially when he has no history of experience in analysis.
    2
  8. Nuclear powers are extremely reluctant to go to war with each other, I'm pretty certain the only reason Israel didn't want them to have nukes is because if they did then they'd be under MAD doctrine which means any conflict between them would almost have to be small and low-risk, likely proxy, something they hate cause they want to wipe out Iran, sure Iran may want to wipe out Israel too, but Israel has nukes, so without justification they can't simply sling nukes at Iran, it would look like them punching down.
    2
  9. Keep in mind, public trade is hyper-regulated regulated by the government and ESG is owned and operated by economic NGOs with WEF and US subsidiary backing, Bungie made every Halo up to Halo Reach with passion and drive, Nintendo and many Japanese and Korea companies do not have this problem and are none of them are publicly traded in the US (most studios in Japan and Korea aren't publicly traded at all) and do not fall under US public trade regulations nor are even eligible for ESG even if they did follow through. And keep in mind, when Japanese businessmen noticeably fail a business, they don't go into government, NGOs, the WEF, or often even another big name business, they are shamed out of the industry almost entirely, so if they fail they are punished for it. Japan and Korea (ignoring half of Sony as they are publicly traded in the US) don't make good products off the backs of being better people, their incentives inherently align with the consumer base so egregious investments are discouraged else they will not only lose money but their job that makes them that money. This is not a capitalism problem remotely, like aside from historically good and bad games always existing then and now, the Far East does not suffer at all from the Western gamedev problem despite being just as if not more capitalist, notice in fact how much regulation and government intervention public trade (specifically American public trade) has and how the companies that have since started to succeed the most and are the most consumer considerate have absolutely no public trade fueling them, a lot of the issue is not just a government issue but it is a massive part, look at manga/manhwa and anime, or even the new indie comic scene, compare it to the comic and media scene in propagated exclusively in Hollywood? The only somewhat big name alternative of late has been the Daily Wire, which in the least you can say has put out a lot better stuff regardless of whether you agree with them or not. All the big name companies in Hollywood are publicly traded in the US from Disney to Universal to Warner Brothers, that's not a capitalism problem, in fact if anything I'd argue its an anti-capitalism problem driven by incentives that require satisfying the board over the customer which only happens specifically because the business is required by law to do so else the government will come after them, even if stockholders got mad nothing happens unless those with all the money were to sue over fiduciary responsibility. You can even see this with Disney right now, did you not see the latest shareholder meeting from Disney? It was literally nothing but politics, people asking when they'll get out of it and complaining about taking positions in politics they shouldn't, or say not paying for de-transition surgery when one regrets it despite paying for transition surgery, and then Bob Iger just accused everyone are not knowing what "Woke" even is, that it doesn't exist, and that Disney is not woke. This all costed him massive in stock, but who is gonna sue over fiduciary responsibility? The board voted him for another year with 94% approval despite shareholder disapproval. I say it should be fairly obvious the problem is especially evident that its American intervention and regulation that most caused this issue and public trade is the biggest problem of it.
    2
  10. I remember the "very fine people" hoax where NPC morons like that claim Trump called the neo-nazis of Charlottesville "very fine people" except he literally said that he denounced the neo-nazi torchholders and was explicitly only speaking about the people on the two sides of the whether to take down the statues or not. I am sick of these idiots. Every time some moron says "the right doesn't denounce their side's extremists" that person needs to be locked up an insane asylum, and I don't mean that as a joke, they are shadowboxing schizos that are a literal danger to themselves and others
    2
  11. W chat
    2
  12. A really good woman will likely also have some intuition of the bad ones.
    1
  13. Zechariah 11-12 says that Israel is condemned for selling God for 30 pieces of silver, the Covenant was broken and so God broke the staff of Union and Favor with them.
    1
  14.  @whippinsaw  All law is enforced religion, its just a matter of what god you worship.
    1
  15. The E in ESG meaning environmental has very little to do with regulation, its subsidies and tax credits, the purpose of the E is the same as the S, look like you care about an issue when in reality you don't, its not future proofing because majority of the environmental takes won't be regulated in a way you can avoid. ESG isn't a grassroots concept and its not natural in the financial sphere, its the result of government intervention and companies like Blackrock and Vanguard, ESG pushes to support the environmental death cults.
    1
  16. Just keeps proving that minimum wage is a retarded concept made by economic illiterates who don't understand anything about basic economics, as does anyone who supports it.
    1
  17. Zechariah 11-12 also demonstrates they are a heathen state at war and enemies of God.
    1
  18. Asmon doesn't understand anything about economics, his single payer argument is one of the worst economic arguments I've ever seen.
    1
  19.  @iezdubz  Well the argument that there's a middle man that takes money and thus jacks prices is a Marxist argument, not a free market argument, (in fact it spits in the face of the American Founders who agreed with John Locke, which requires a rejection of free market opposition) its anti-market and demonstrates that he doesn't understand anything about basic economics. First off insurance companies aren't allowed to compete, foremost they sparsely are allowed to compete across state lines (only under permission of the state) but also because the Federal government regulates and controls the very existent capability for an insurance company to exist, they can decide on a whim to reject the development of a new insurance company, which drives down competition and supply, which both drive up prices thanks to the basics of supply and demand. The monopolies exist off the back of the government restricting and regulating the companies, and the more regulations you put, the more red tape you introduce, which drives up the price of developing a company thus raising the barrier to more competition, as red tape costs a lot more money (bureaucratically and legally) to get around. Now this aside the New Deal also outright banned mutual aid organizations, especially at the community, neighborhood, and regional level, as well as between friends and family. It used to be that mutual aids would help each other voluntarily, you pay in to a community thing with no real middle man and it was the mutual aid members that decided your coverage, some mutual aids, like fraternity societies, would also require you to assist them in certain task, volunteering, or fundraising in order to keep coverage. And everyone voluntarily joined these, it was especially common among churches. Insurance should be allowed to freely compete under free association, which is implicit in the 1st Amendment, but because people are simpletons they reject the basic responsibilities of free association while wanting all the privileges. Free association means the government is not involved in the deals you decide to make, and when you do charity and community becomes the biggest factor. A moral society relies on charity, an immoral society relies on legal oversight.
    1
  20.  @iezdubz  Well the argument that there's a middle man that takes money and thus jacks prices is a Marxist argument, not a free market argument, (in fact it spits in the face of the American Founders who agreed with John Locke, which requires a rejection of free market opposition) its anti-market and demonstrates that he doesn't understand anything about basic economics.
    1
  21.  @iezdubz  First off insurance companies aren't allowed to compete, foremost they sparsely are allowed to compete across state lines (only under permission of the state) but also because the Federal government regulates and controls the very existent capability for an insurance company to exist, they can decide on a whim to reject the development of a new insurance company, which drives down competition and supply, which both drive up prices thanks to the basics of supply and demand.
    1
  22.  @iezdubz  The monopolies exist off the back of the government restricting and regulating the companies, and the more regulations you put, the more red tape you introduce, which drives up the price of developing a company thus raising the barrier to more competition, as red tape costs a lot more money (bureaucratically and legally) to get around.
    1
  23.  @iezdubz  Now this aside the New Deal also outright banned mutual aid organizations, especially at the community, neighborhood, and regional level, as well as between friends and family. It used to be that mutual aids would help each other voluntarily, you pay in to a community thing with no real middle man and it was the mutual aid members that decided your coverage, some mutual aids, like fraternity societies, would also require you to assist them in certain task, volunteering, or fundraising in order to keep coverage. And everyone voluntarily joined these, it was especially common among churches. Insurance should be allowed to freely compete under free association, which is implicit in the 1st Amendment, but because people are simpletons they reject the basic responsibilities of free association while wanting all the privileges.
    1
  24.  @iezdubz  Free association means the government is not involved in the deals you decide to make, and when you do charity and community becomes the biggest factor. A moral society relies on charity, an immoral society relies on legal oversight.
    1
  25.  @iezdubz  Well the argument that there's a middle man that takes money and thus jacks prices is a M@rxist argument, not a free market argument, (in fact it dishonors the American Founders who agreed with John Locke, which requires a rejection of free market opposition) its anti-market and demonstrates that he doesn't understand anything about basic economics.
    1
  26.  @iezdubz  First off insurance companies aren't allowed to compete, foremost they sparsely are allowed to compete across state lines (only under permission of the state) but also because the Fed regulates and controls the very capability for an insurance company to exist and can decide on a whim to reject the development of a new insurance company, which drives down competition and supply, which both drive up prices.
    1
  27.  @iezdubz  The monopolies exist off the back of the government restricting and regulating the companies, and the more regulations you put, the more red tape you introduce, which drives up the price of developing a company thus raising the barrier to more competition, red tape costs a lot more money to get around.
    1
  28.  @iezdubz  The New Deal aside also outright prohibited mutual aid organizations, at the community, neighborhood, and regional level, as well as between friends and family.
    1
  29.  @iezdubz  And everyone voluntarily joined these, it was especially common among churches.
    1
  30.  @iezdubz  Insurance should be allowed to freely compete under free association, which is implicit in the 1st Amendment, but because people are simpletons they reject the basic responsibilities of free association while wanting all the privileges.
    1
  31.  @iezdubz  Free association means the government is not involved in the deals you decide to make, and when you do charity and community becomes the biggest factor. A moral society relies on charity, an immoral society relies on legal oversight.
    1
  32.  @iezdubz  Its not a matter of opinion, its a matter of basic economic and historical understanding, the government (state and fed) is at fault for destroying competition and creating the atmosphere of abuse that insurance companies are legally required to use, (yes they are legally required to act as they have) and you're not allowed to make mutual aid "insurance", or any small business insurance because its nationally illegal because of the New Deal.
    1
  33. Saint Floyd of the Fentanyl was already screaming "I can't breath" well before the cops even did anything to him, anyone who actually knows what an OD is like, witness or otherwise, would not look at the full clip and say any of the cops got Floyd killed, downing speedballs, fent, and crack all at once would kill anyone given enough time.
    1
  34.  @WolfamongSheep626  Says the anti-american traitor, we don't want your applause cause we've seen what makes you cheer.
    1
  35.  @MarieV2withChrist  Zechariah 11-12. Clearly God does not support Israel, the Covenant was broken and they sold our Messiah for 30 pieces of silver, they have no inheritance in Heaven, they are the Synagogue of Satan. (Revelation 2:9, 3:9)
    1
  36.  @Bmmills816  They don't have the Covenant, we of Christ have the New Covenant, they sold the Covenant for 30 pieces of silver and so God broke it with them, read Zechariah 11-12. As John the Baptist said, He made children of Abraham out of the stones, for the inheritance from Israel was broken with the staff of Union and Favor. We of Christ are the priests of Melchizedek, the greater and older priesthood, descended from Christ, no Synagogue of Satan can inherit this life, we are the true Jews.
    1
  37. "Trump is responsibility for Jan 6th" Dude he called for the National Guard and was ignored, he posted a tweet to not go into the building and was shadow-banned, what the goddamn else do you want him to do? He did literally everything he could to prevent the people from entering the building. Asmon and his damn takes sometimes.
    1
  38. I will point out we have done literally everything possible to prove that the lack of acceptance of transgenderism has nothing to do with the suicide rates, the rate of suicide in a social environment with and without acceptance does not change in any statistical way and we have repeated proof of this. And compare this against other Identitarian groups like homosexuality or race when they weren't and were accepted and you'll notice the suicide rates don't go down as a result of acceptance, in fact following social acceptance the suicide rate tends to increase if it changes at all. This inherently demonstrates that transgenderism is a mental disorder, healthy people do not have any of these statistical trends. The propaganda that claims transgender suicides decrease through social acceptance is literally the statistical inverse, literally every study and metastudy on the subject we've had on the subject has demonstrated this fact, there are so few of either specifically because of how known this phenomenon is and how little money there was in the demonstrating the factual case of social acceptance lacking correlation with the suicide rates.
    1
  39. Asmon's support of UBI routinely proves that he doesn't know anything about economics, then again he says the democrats have good economic policy, so that's kinda inherent. Only an economic troglodyte supports their policies economically, and its trivial to argue that fact when you've learned even just basic eocnomics, socialist policies are what caused all the issues we're suffering today, (FDR was economically the worst president in American history without contest) within 10 years Social Security will be defunct and will bankrupt the US. (and that's presuming Trump removes the scammers from it)
    1
  40. The problem is that cities don't allow private house expansion, they constrict the market preventing competition which causes this problem.
    1
  41. Even if many of his views can't, their parents can, and its quite likely that families of people who watch Adin will think twice about Kamala.
    1
  42. Looks nothing like Borderlands.
    1
  43. "Something needs to be done" LA: "Yeah, lets burn down our own property, that'll show the feds we're a serious threat, capping ourselves in the foot. Its not like our worthless economy isn't already in the gutter or anything."
    1
  44. Its pretty simple, men and women choose women and men, when the relationship breakdowns or is violated, it is the fault of each party that also did not investigate and audit the other, you should start with your demands in the relationship, the boundaries in the relationship, and the objectives of the relationship, and for a girlfriend or boyfriend that cannot uphold this contract and is unwilling to repent (as in apologize and turn away from this behavior, like seeking help) you immediately drop them and move on. If you don't share values, don't even bother unless you expect to bring them into your value system.
    1
  45.  @MunyuShizumi  The problem with his alleged statistics work is its never been presented in court that he's done anything and even worse he make statistic falsehoods, assumptions on stats that nobody with stats experience would ever support and any statistician would've told you NEVER SAY SOMETHING LIKE THAT, (even first year stat students would've told him shutup, even stat kids in high school would've been able to say "he can't say that") and he got away with saying crap and people like Asmon, who don't know anything about stats, believe him cause he's got skills in a completely unrelated field. If Asmon was the average juror, which glad he's not, they'd have made a crap assumption that's wrong regarding the lawyer and the "Wizard" over a misunderstanding of what statistics is. He doesn't get to call it scientific at all and if he is a stats expert he quite literally lied to the court.
    1
  46. The spicy cat showed up on her oshi's stream again lol.
    1
  47. "What is it called the dark ages, its because of religion" Uh no, literally every historian I can recall would call this take stupid, I can name at least 5 off the top of my head right now from all political sides that have called that take stupid outright. The dark ages is a false moniker, in fact in many cases the people of the "dark ages" were more ingenious and innovative then those found during the renaissance where the term "dark ages" spawned from, during the "dark ages" more people bathed then for centuries following it. During the "dark ages" lots of old Roman infrastructure was routinely maintained where after them much of the infrastructure collapsed. All modern philosophy and law spawns from the "dark ages", absolutely dumb propaganda at work, Asmon view of history has, as once again proven by his trash NA education, to be dumb and wrong. Also if Asmon really knew anything about the Crusades, it would be pretty hard to claim what he has.
    1
  48. Literally none of OG Bungie is at Bungie, they all left by the time Destiny 1 reached EOL, I have no reason to be interested, especially when it lacks the things that made the OG Marathon interesting.
    1
  49.  @Naxiwuno  Pretty sure Jason Jones helped kick out the entire rest of the team to prevent paying the contracted benefit shares that were promised when they joined the company. Marty talked rather extensively about the business crap that happened during the Destiny purge. I wouldn't really consider him alone OG Bungie at this point, honestly he wasn't even involved in the best games nor had the best ideas.
    1
  50. 19:00 Asmon should've specifically asked "Can any of you recall a case of little league sports where boys and girls were co-ed" cause I can tell you there isn't a single one, I played little league baseball, they never had any girls.
    1