Comments by "bruno bond" (@mrunning10) on "EXPLORE WITH US" channel.

  1. WTFAYTA?
    2
  2. So much incorrect in this, so much out of context. Mixing of timelines, mixing of what was said to whom where and when. Added up, this vid is HORSESHIT. ONE example out of dozens: the pages were not "mysteriously torn out." Scholars know who did it and why, and by the way they were cut, razored-out, not "torn" HORSESHIT video.
    2
  3. So much incorrect in this, so much out of context. Mixing of timelines, mixing of what was said to whom where and when. Added up, this vid is HORSESHIT. ONE example out of dozens: the pages were not "mysteriously torn out." Scholars know who did it and why, and by the way they were cut, razored-out, not "torn" HORSESHIT video.
    2
  4. So much incorrect in this, so much out of context. Mixing of timelines, mixing of what was said to whom where and when. Added up, this vid is HORSESHIT. ONE example out of dozens: the pages were not "mysteriously torn out." Scholars know who did it and why, and by the way they were cut, razored-out, not "torn" HORSESHIT video.
    2
  5. YOU believe?? How about all of the historical scholars studying the man? NO, not "about" Alice. But written because of Alice and for Alice.
    2
  6. And if he had flying rainbow unicorns pooping out his arse that would also explain his favor of the other kids as it would entertain them right?
    2
  7.  @xFlowerChild420x  Sure thing, anyone can speculate anything against the dead, they can't sue in a court of law.
    2
  8. What the fuck are YOU talking about? Dodgson never hurt, abused, molested, groomed anyone ever his entire life. THAT is what we KNOW.
    2
  9. YASFOS. Amazing mind trip here. Feel good to PUKE, does it? My God, there is more fiction in your post then Alice's Adventures in Wonderland. EVERY sentence is delusional, Amazing, couldn't do that even if I tried! Try the TMAP program and up the dosage of Clozapine right away!
    2
  10. the devils! not like we do that now!
    1
  11. HORSESHIT theory. No parallels at all to MJ. Intercourse MJ.
    1
  12. HORSESHIT.
    1
  13. EXACTLY. So much incorrect in this, so much out of context. Mixing of timelines, mixing of what was said to whom where and when. Added up, this vid is HORSESHIT. ONE example out of dozens: the pages were not "mysteriously torn out." Scholars know who did it and why, and by the way they were cut, razored-out, not "torn" HORSESHIT video.
    1
  14. There are no parallels at all between Dodgson and MJ. Intercourse MJ.
    1
  15. Yet another another HORSESHIT theory.
    1
  16. Wow, where the fuck did you dream up THAT fantasy horsecrap?
    1
  17. WTFAYTA??
    1
  18. OMG, what HORSESHIT thinking, can't even attaching "thinking" to this theory. What utter CRAP.
    1
  19. I'm sure you have a few bats in the belfry too. Like viewing this vid and thinking its "true" without doing some research on your own, read up, get educated before commenting Horseshit. Dodgson never harmed or abused or molested or groomed or endangered anyone his entire life.
    1
  20.  @whatanitemare  Nailed It. Except, "...a lot more about you than the Rev. Charles Dodgson"
    1
  21. Who cares? What does THIS have to do with Dodgson?? Not into the fantasy genre too much make believe, try AAIW instead.
    1
  22. What do you think of the books?
    1
  23. That's because this vid has so much incorrect, so much out of context. Mixing of timelines, mixing of what was said to whom where and when. Added up, this vid is HORSESHIT. ONE example out of dozens: the pages were not "mysteriously torn out." Scholars know who did it and why, and by the way they were cut, razored-out, not "torn" HORSESHIT video.
    1
  24. No he did NOT. Wake up from your internet dream reality. That picture was NOT Lorina Charlotte Liddell but some "medical condition" photograph that might have been in his collection (over 1/2 of his 3,000 photographs in his collection were BOUGHT) (and the ink on the back of that photograph by the way is MODERN, not from the 1880s) Wake UP stop propagating HORSESHIT because it reinforces imagined neurosis in YOUR head.
    1
  25. Because it didn't happen. Simple eh? Dodgson was in love with Alice, the falling out was not big deal, just Victorian Era put one in one's proper place. What these internet scandal vids don't do is proper research. Dodgson even in the early days with the three sisters was NEVER alone with the girls. He stayed within "friendly" terms with the family and with Alice for the remainder of his life.
    1
  26. WTF? Ramble a stream-of-consciousness somewhere else in the mirror perhaps?
    1
  27. Exactly! Although HORSESHIT works too.
    1
  28. That's because Dodgson WAS a child, he never lost it in growing up and we in modern times socially correct drugged out world just don't know how to deal with this. So all we say is "he was sick."
    1
  29. HORSESHIT.
    1
  30. What tone? Stupid and mindless?
    1
  31. HORSESHIT.
    1
  32.  @i10i60  Nope. Historical scholars studying the man all their lives. NOT this HORSESHIT vid.
    1
  33. And HOW, just ONCE, were ANY of Dodgson's "child friends" taken advantage of? Point to something please NOT just internet scandal innuendo crap for clicks. Not once, no evidence that Dodgson ever, his entire life, or the entire life of the children even into adulthood, that he ever abused, molested, groomed, hurt anyone ever.
    1
  34. Yah, ain't imagination just wonderful? This vid and that theory is CRAP. So much incorrect in this vid, so much out of context. Mixing of timelines, mixing of what was said to whom where and when. Added up, this vid is HORSESHIT. ONE example out of dozens: the pages were not "mysteriously torn out." Scholars know who did it and why, and by the way they were cut, razored-out, not "torn" HORSESHIT video.
    1
  35. Criminal Law Amendment Act (CLAA) 1885, the Act that raised the age of consent from thirteen to sixteen. They were not "alarmed." Simply did not think that a working man, an employee, should marry a daughter, simple as that.
    1
  36. WTFAYTA? "held at Columbia" did you even listen or do ANY research as to WHY she (and her surviving son as well) were INVITED to New York?? Any CLUE? What HORSESHIT thinking.
    1
  37. So what? What do YOU think in reading the works??
    1
  38. YASFOS. Replay, get the timeline right this time around. He wasn't allowed to "see the kids" 2 years before the book was presented. And by the way, any man who hand-inks a book like that is a man in love. Duh. This vid is HORSESHIT.
    1
  39. How about the book?
    1
  40. EXACTLY! but ain't internet scandal and innuendo just marvelous?
    1
  41. Your taste, a shame, try reading it again, rediscover childhood lost. Let go, find the inner child if there ever was one.
    1
  42.  @quinnhen2325  cluck cluck cluck
    1
  43. YASFOS. Horseshit theory. Do YOUR homework.
    1
  44. So what? Grace Slick and her stupid song can go intercourse themselves. NOTHING to do with Dodgson, Alice, or the stories.
    1
  45. EXACTLY! Another HORSESHIT theory This vid is CRAP.
    1
  46. Another HORSESHIT theory.
    1
  47. OK; like what?
    1
  48.  @i10i60  And what we can't reconcile is the grooming of the parents, ALL of the parents of EVERY child he photographed. Not sneaky, not clandestine, open.
    1
  49.  @i10i60  Sure we can; what happened? Nothing. Throughout his life and the lives of the children and all the families. NOTHING. Don't you see the internet scandal Rabbit Hole of the thinking exhibited by this vid and many others?
    1
  50. FCS. "Liddell" not Little. And who are "they?" and please provide the reference to this "rumor." First ANYONE has ever heard of it. HORSESHIT.
    1