Comments by "irresistablejewel" (@irresistablejewel) on "Sky News" channel.

  1.  @lewisgreenway5065  He's not getting the job (get used to it). The UK isn't as much use to the globalists since it left the EU (even after all we've done for them); they'll be wanting someone in the EU. Looks like they forgot to tell Ben.
    1
  2.  @sh.4409  It's New Labour and they introduced tuition fees; don't represent the unions (who founded the party); pro war (when America whistles); more anti social, than socialist. Not saying socialism is in any way perfect, but Tory v Tory light isn't much of a choice; there's not much left to sell off and importing unskilled workers (we have enough I think). The turnout suggests voters don't like these politicians... Corbyn was left wing, but the bankers got rid of him quick... but if the UK economy was a horse, be kinder to shoot it.
    1
  3.  @GoreTexTillEndEx  America providing billions with homelessness and addiction rife; says a lot really. Not much reason for Russia to breach dam, they could just open the sluice gates; or blowing up their own pipelines (50/50 with Germany) or the iodine pipeline... instead of just turning them off. Evidence? According to Ukraine they're winning; but they still need more money; better send lots, this is going to get v expensive. Flooding their own defenses; the Russians must be stupid; or they didn't do it. It's one of the two and I know the Russians aren't stupid.
    1
  4.  @Deputydog-r7d  What has Ukraine got against starving Africans? (just using SKY's argument against them).
    1
  5.  @RaRa-eu9mw  If only 3% of Ukrainian grain was going to Africa, then SKY news is not telling us the truth; but either way Ukraine won't have grain shortages. China has placed restrictions on food exports. It looks like yet another case where American interest inconveniences the EU; as they can't buy grain from the World largest grain exporter (Russia) without attracting sanctions. It seems Africa will receive the same quantity, while Western sanctions have distorted various markets (grain just being one); this useful method of supply/demand hasn't worked properly for some time. I would imagine with Russia recently crossing off around $23 Billion in African debt and covering the 3% they know that it would infuriate the globalists if they kept the same price. With 48 African countries sending representatives to St Petersburg, it seems they view something as important. I doubt the globalists are interested in any peace plan (from China or Africa) they're in too deep; I believe there is sufficient grain, but with EU sanctions; a Russian naval blockade and mismatched rail gauges, the EU has the supply problems. It won't inconvenience America and that's the main thing; so they can keep fiddling about with: the $; other markets and "double down" on their "investment", but it seems a lot of countries aren't interested in that. So many deals being made that exclude "the West", it's easy to see why and that's in long term. It's not going to help us if the corporate media are telling us lies (and I think they are). Seem to believe their own publicity, it's surprising what superpowers can do; economic sanctions were never going to work. Now where's my lethal aid? ;-)
    1
  6. A lot of countries aren't interested in the conflict (nothing in it for them) they've got their own problems.
    1
  7.  @aormonde  A million drones? Well here's the bill... Sean Bell still droning on... SKY "news" are a bunch of wasters!
    1
  8. "How will the West try to prove if Prigozhin is dead?" Maybe wait to see if he shows up after his holidays? Meanwhile let's gossip amongst ourselves...
    1
  9. "Why has Russia increased attacks in the east?" That will be because the West has been fiddling about (blowing up Nordstream2 etc) or sending more weapons; or just running their mouths off (something like that); while SKY plans the Russian battle strategy; Russia is not following the advice of those who cheered on the wars in Iraq; Afghanistan or Libya (that bunch of losers).
    1
  10. The joke's on us; it's our money they're using... where's our "lethal aid"?
    1
  11. When they want to start a nuclear war; NATO isn't calling the shots here; they're just money laundering. Send more...
    1
  12. The goofy looking dog? No the insurance companies might lose money so count them out.
    1
  13. No They just contaminate land (like mines) and it strongly suggests the American "chickenhawks" (want war; won't go) are getting desperate.
    1
  14.  @1969utube  Oh c'mon... by 2020 American corporations: owned Ukraine; had their foot on the EU gas pipe and it's just the loans and rebuilding contract left to fight for now.
    1
  15.  @tommieberggren3324  According to Russia: it was agreed that payment for their grain shipments could be made through the SWIFT payment system and in return Russia would not interfere with Ukrainian grain exports by sea; there were also allegations the Ukraine used the grain corridor to launch an attack on the Kerch bridge. As mentioned the Prof is wrong; Russia didn't pull out of the grain deal, it expired; so either the Prof is being willfully misleading or doesn't know what he's talking about. (More from Sly news later).
    1
  16.  @tommieberggren3324  Yes and obviously they will continue to do so until there is nuclear war; but the globalists either don't know that or don't care. Got your nuclear bunker?
    1
  17. I do and SKY looks like "the enemy within"... they talk about money all the time (our money in their pocket).
    1
  18. Well it's your money...
    1
  19. Tell that to Monsanto, but it didn't work for them.
    1
  20.  @keith8609  It's not doing that tho'. The Russian speaking regions are occupied; Crimea is too important to Russia (to allow it to "sail" West) and Hitler had the same ideas as Bush and Cheney (and look what happened). The Ukrainian government have been at war with these regions (banning Russian another provocation) and Western expansionism had to stop. The American (msm) media trying to play the dumb bunnies; shedding crocodile tears, their sponsors have lost a fortune ("doubling down" with taxpayers money); if it persists Russia has told them it will end in nuclear war. NATO should be extremely worried about the rogue terrorist group blowing up pipelines, that works both ways; maybe quickly before satellites start falling from the sky? Those neo-Con warmongers might realize words have consequences; I hear America is so weak it allows Russia to elect their President (because H Clinton told me so....). After lying to Russia and China: she came; she saw; she blew her election chances in one sentence (still makes me laugh!). Another NATO "intervention to save civilian life" (that never does); they'll get their heads handed to them; so don't expect that.
    1
  21. "Labour will abolish House of Lords if in government" No they won't; that's just another lie from the Murdoch media and part-time MP's with their second jobs that's just corruption. The main parties already voted heavily against abolishing the House of Lords; so it's not going to happen and these foreign news agencies need to be penalized when they spread lies... enough "fake news"!
    1
  22. I suspect they heard a loud bang; but yes it is rather convenient that the Western media got that footage and the passenger manifesto within a day. It's food for trolls. The rush to accuse suggests to me the accusers know more than they are telling us, or guessing. I'd point out that even in the mafia there are penalties for killing innocent people. Just based on their track record whatever SKY say about this it's probably fantasy. Btw That chap in the mugshot, does not look pleased; but we can probably rule him out.
    1
  23. Germany have said they will supply tanks after America supplies tanks, which seems reasonable, America has "invested" heavily, while Germany has to find a new energy supply; deal with refugees and after the Western powers build a physical wall through Berlin, there is certainly a lot of history to be considered; so Germany have basically said no. American tanks in Europe, is that not WW3?
    1
  24.  @pavlosegeda8294  It looks like every time the American led coalition talks about escalation Russia attacks cities in West Ukraine; it seems one target was an underground ammo store near Kyiv airfield (massive explosion), but as Ukraine claims to have shot everything down it could be human error!?
    1
  25.  @S-sp2fe  The term "aid" is to try and make America sound charitable, when it's not... they don't even aid their own homeless. It's a sick joke from a Bell-end.
    1
  26. Cleverly probably just sore he has to pay to heat his stables, by himself... Yes, hypocrisy is running rampant! So is misuse of public money...
    1
  27. Enjoying a holiday illegally? Those dastardly Russians, eh?
    1
  28.  @Gerrard_Pike2008  Yes, in the post truth West Whataboutism = hypocrisy; lethal aid = guns and nuclear fallout will be called "magic Moonbeams". 🤫
    1
  29. Watch with Mother?
    1
  30. It's only Bell...end and pie in the SKY; it's not the only thing they got wrong.
    1
  31.  @biddyboy1570  Ben d'Over is more than happy to help.
    1
  32.  @springbloom5940  Russia did put the first space station in orbit; have their own gps and social media (so luckily don't have to listen to this corporate media twaddle).
    1
  33. Russia crossed off over $20 Billion in African debt, there were 48 African countries represented and Russia will cover the 3% of Ukrainian grain; while America continues to play Europe.
    1
  34.  @Wutumaster  If the Western interests cause a nuclear incident? The nationalist would likely get their way; they'd target weapons suppliers; might even light up the Western seaboard of some country or other. Russia contaminating land they intend to call Russia doesn't seem likely in the least; I believe Ukraine already shelled this facility (although I wasn't there and have little trust in our media already). It's getting close to world war already; but I wouldn't buy a used car off Bell. He knows nothing.
    1
  35. America and the UK don't want peace to break out; while the majority of the world aren't much interested in America's: fears; interests or words. All the Ukrainian government had to say was Ukraine is not going to join NATO or the EU (otherwise it was war). Shelling the Russian speaking regions (that voted for independence in 2014) for eight years, banning Russian; all this charity from the Western interests (not known to be charitable), it's all very provocative. I do agree tho' that only Russia and Ukraine can resolve this; but arm manufacturers might have to lay off people and they do contribute so much in tax, it's a matter of priorities. For Russia the priority is to take a wrecking ball to the Western interests investments, unfortunately made with our money (while our citizens face rising inflation; homelessness and poverty). Y'know if the UK government doesn't wise up soon there just could be a war (here).
    1
  36. The US are always sniffing about, see what they can get; did it detect oil?
    1
  37. I don't think the BRICS accept members with sanctions against their members; but I do agree, UK getting involved in more of these American proxy wars is just asking for trouble.
    1
  38.  @JohnFlynn-p3i  Spin me another... it's the SKY version of events that is a pile of rubble; nobody wins (we all lose); now a word from our sponsor, buy guns!
    1
  39. Did the Tories just join Wagner group?
    1
  40. At least they can add two numbers together, the Western bots obviously can't.
    1
  41. The UK doesn't have F-16s to give.
    1
  42. The man from the country that put the first space station in orbit is that saying that the Western interests can't even play by their own rules and so they blew it. Seems a fair appraisal.
    1
  43.  @enigma1000  Surely not just Russians; fans of gallows humor must get a real belt out of Sean.
    1
  44. End of May postponed to June
    1
  45. Well then, I bet Russia could take down all your satellites... your move.
    1
  46. @Guajiro-b2k Fined $173 million for 900,000 violations of the Unfair Insurance Practices Act... and that's just the tip of the iceberg (by the looks of it).
    1
  47.  @themanwiththegoldengun1998  The BBC World Service is fairly reliable, but they often miss stuff out (strikes; civil unrest in Europe; anything that might get the license fee cut); whereas SKY are pro-war propagandists (always have been). I'm increasingly concerned that the UK will be left "holding the baby" as the American far-right continue to "play" the E.U. While Russia did make it clear if Ukraine gave up neutrality there would be trouble and are supposed to believe the West sent billions because they're charitable?! They're not!
    1
  48. Yes, just can't help overthrowing governments it's like cheese biscuits, kinda moreish. Gets any bigger might attack Tokyo all by herself... doesn't like pipelines tho' (trip hazard, I guess)
    1
  49. SKY the enemy within.
    1
  50. Russia is clearly aware of that, after the destruction of Libya and the attempted corporate takeover of Ukraine (try to buy the sickle, they'll use the hammer). The West was warned!
    1